‘They Made an Excellent Start…but After a While, It Started to Die Out’, Tensions in Combining Personalisation and Integration in English Adult Social Care
Kerry Allen, Emily Burn, Kelly Hall, Catherine Mangan, Catherine Needham
{"title":"‘They Made an Excellent Start…but After a While, It Started to Die Out’, Tensions in Combining Personalisation and Integration in English Adult Social Care","authors":"Kerry Allen, Emily Burn, Kelly Hall, Catherine Mangan, Catherine Needham","doi":"10.1017/S1474746422000392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to understand the challenges of combining the distinct aims of personalisation and integration in adult social care. Addressing the local context of service delivery in England through interviews with key stakeholders, we identify how personalisation and integration activities require different, and potentially conflicting, approaches. We observe direct tensions when structural integration with health systems distracts focus from achieving personalised delivery of care or where a focus on clinical outcomes takes precedence over broader wellbeing aspirations. Integration can entail the prioritisation of health over social care and a population rather than personal orientation. We suggest that personalisation and integration are in ‘policy conflict’ (Weible and Heikkila, 2017) and that policy-makers need to acknowledge and address this rather than promise the ‘best of both worlds’.","PeriodicalId":47397,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy and Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"172 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article seeks to understand the challenges of combining the distinct aims of personalisation and integration in adult social care. Addressing the local context of service delivery in England through interviews with key stakeholders, we identify how personalisation and integration activities require different, and potentially conflicting, approaches. We observe direct tensions when structural integration with health systems distracts focus from achieving personalised delivery of care or where a focus on clinical outcomes takes precedence over broader wellbeing aspirations. Integration can entail the prioritisation of health over social care and a population rather than personal orientation. We suggest that personalisation and integration are in ‘policy conflict’ (Weible and Heikkila, 2017) and that policy-makers need to acknowledge and address this rather than promise the ‘best of both worlds’.
本文旨在了解在成人社会护理中结合个性化和整合的不同目标所面临的挑战。通过与主要利益相关者的访谈,我们解决了英格兰服务提供的当地情况,确定了个性化和整合活动如何需要不同的、可能相互冲突的方法。当与卫生系统的结构性整合分散了对实现个性化护理交付的关注,或者对临床结果的关注优先于更广泛的福祉愿望时,我们观察到直接的紧张关系。一体化可以使保健优先于社会保健和以人口为导向而不是以个人为导向。我们认为个性化和一体化存在“政策冲突”(Weible and Heikkila, 2017),政策制定者需要承认并解决这一问题,而不是承诺“两全其美”。