Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in the Context of Electronic Learning in Educational Institutions

Q2 Social Sciences Global Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-03-23 DOI:10.1163/2211906x-11010003
Mohamed Sami AbdulSadek, Anas Faisal Al-Tourah
{"title":"Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in the Context of Electronic Learning in Educational Institutions","authors":"Mohamed Sami AbdulSadek, Anas Faisal Al-Tourah","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-11010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In providing Electronic learning (hereinafter “E-learning”), educational institutions often deal with Intellectual Property Rights (hereinafter “ipr”) regulations, particularly copyright. The interaction between the E-learning and the ipr occurs in one of three possible scenarios: \n \n 1.\n The case where the educational institution owns an E-learning system. This takes place either when the institution develops the system internally, or by purchasing or licensing the ipr of an already developed system.\n \n \n 2.\n Educational institutions legitimately use protected works for educational purposes, such as illustration, criticism or analysis and are thus not required to obtain permission from the developers for such purposes, as per the laws and regulations of ipr.\n \n \n 3.\n Educational institutions infringe ipr by copying or using protected systems and making them available to students despite the first and second options.\n \n \n This paper attempts to clarify the differences between these three methods and enlighten those involved in the management of educational institutions about what is lawful and what is not, when developing or using E-learning systems.","PeriodicalId":38000,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906x-11010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In providing Electronic learning (hereinafter “E-learning”), educational institutions often deal with Intellectual Property Rights (hereinafter “ipr”) regulations, particularly copyright. The interaction between the E-learning and the ipr occurs in one of three possible scenarios: 1. The case where the educational institution owns an E-learning system. This takes place either when the institution develops the system internally, or by purchasing or licensing the ipr of an already developed system. 2. Educational institutions legitimately use protected works for educational purposes, such as illustration, criticism or analysis and are thus not required to obtain permission from the developers for such purposes, as per the laws and regulations of ipr. 3. Educational institutions infringe ipr by copying or using protected systems and making them available to students despite the first and second options. This paper attempts to clarify the differences between these three methods and enlighten those involved in the management of educational institutions about what is lawful and what is not, when developing or using E-learning systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育机构电子学习背景下的知识产权保护
在提供电子学习(以下简称“电子学习”)时,教育机构经常涉及知识产权法规,尤其是版权法规。电子学习和知识产权之间的互动发生在三种可能的场景之一:1。教育机构拥有电子学习系统的情况。这发生在机构内部开发系统时,或者通过购买或许可已经开发的系统的知识产权。2.根据知识产权法律法规,教育机构合法地将受保护的作品用于教育目的,如插图、批评或分析,因此无需获得开发商的许可。3.教育机构通过复制或使用受保护的系统侵犯知识产权,并不顾第一和第二种选择向学生提供这些系统。本文试图澄清这三种方法之间的差异,并启发教育机构管理人员在开发或使用电子学习系统时,什么是合法的,什么是不合法的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Journal of Comparative Law
Global Journal of Comparative Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Global Journal of Comparative Law is a peer reviewed periodical that provides a dynamic platform for the dissemination of ideas on comparative law and reports on developments in the field of comparative law from all parts of the world. In our contemporary globalized world, it is almost impossible to isolate developments in the law in one jurisdiction or society from another. At the same time, what is traditionally called comparative law is increasingly subsumed under aspects of International Law. The Global Journal of Comparative Law therefore aims to maintain the discipline of comparative legal studies as vigorous and dynamic by deepening the space for comparative work in its transnational context.
期刊最新文献
Access to Public Documents and Its Restrictions: a Reflection from the Perspectives of Brazil and Sweden Comparative Study of Selected Nigerian and Indian Labour Practices and the Law The Irony in the Lineage of Modern Chinese Constitutions and Constitutionalism Regulating Surrogacy as a Reproductive Practice in India and Sri Lanka Use of Specialized Tribunals for the Settlement of Construction Projects in Times of a Financial Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1