Disability and the problem of lazy intersectionality

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability & Society Pub Date : 2022-10-12 DOI:10.1080/09687599.2022.2130177
B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz
{"title":"Disability and the problem of lazy intersectionality","authors":"B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2022.2130177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Crenshaw’s concept of intersectionality has been used to include different dimensions of difference and exclusion. We suggest here, however, that intersectional analyses may paradoxically further exclude discussions of the impact of disability in interaction with other factors. We outline three ways in which intersectionality may be incorrectly used. First, there is selective intersectionality where only certain forms of exclusion are considered. Second is subtractive intersectionality in which the experience of privilege may be seen as removing the lived reality of disability exclusion. Finally, we discuss last instance intersectionality in which one particular historical experience of oppression may be seen to cancel out other ongoing forms of exclusion. All these types of misuse of intersectionality may contribute to disability exclusion. Disability theorists should use concepts of intersectionality carefully and with caution.","PeriodicalId":48208,"journal":{"name":"Disability & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":"362 - 366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2130177","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Crenshaw’s concept of intersectionality has been used to include different dimensions of difference and exclusion. We suggest here, however, that intersectional analyses may paradoxically further exclude discussions of the impact of disability in interaction with other factors. We outline three ways in which intersectionality may be incorrectly used. First, there is selective intersectionality where only certain forms of exclusion are considered. Second is subtractive intersectionality in which the experience of privilege may be seen as removing the lived reality of disability exclusion. Finally, we discuss last instance intersectionality in which one particular historical experience of oppression may be seen to cancel out other ongoing forms of exclusion. All these types of misuse of intersectionality may contribute to disability exclusion. Disability theorists should use concepts of intersectionality carefully and with caution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾和懒惰交集的问题
克伦肖的交叉性概念被用来包括不同维度的差异和排斥。然而,我们在这里建议,矛盾的是,交叉分析可能会进一步排除残疾与其他因素相互作用的影响的讨论。我们概述了交叉性可能被错误使用的三种方式。首先,有选择性的交叉性,只考虑某些形式的排斥。其次是减法交叉性,在这种交叉性中,特权的体验可以被视为消除了残疾被排斥的现实。最后,我们讨论了最后一个例子的交叉性,在这种交叉性中,一种特定的压迫历史经历可以被视为抵消了其他正在进行的排斥形式。所有这些类型的交叉性滥用都可能导致残疾排斥。残疾理论家应该谨慎使用交叉性的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
Announcement of doctoral theses ‘Sick with stress’: perspectives on airport travel from persons living with dementia and their travel companions Announcement of doctoral theses Activating disability care: the formation of collective disability care networks in China’s COVID-19 outbreak Manifestations of spatial exclusion and inclusion of people with disabilities in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1