Knowledge hiding in organization: A comprehensive literature review and future research agenda

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Knowledge and Process Management Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1002/kpm.1695
Neha Garg, Chitresh Kumar, Anirban Ganguly
{"title":"Knowledge hiding in organization: A comprehensive literature review and future research agenda","authors":"Neha Garg,&nbsp;Chitresh Kumar,&nbsp;Anirban Ganguly","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on knowledge hiding has rapidly increased over the past decade, but findings have thus far not been systematically synthesized. This, therefore, has not only hampered the clarity surrounding the construct but also restricted growth in this line of research. The current study thus attempts to integrate the scattered KH literature through a systematic literature review to understand the growth of the KH construct, thereby synthesizing the extant research findings, as well as uncovering areas that require future research. Accordingly, 92 research papers were systematically searched, critically evaluated, and synthesized to make the available knowledge and evidence more accessible to scholars and practitioners. The synthesis not only answers some fundamental, yet blurred questions around the construct, but also provides a composite sense of diverse findings recorded in the extant literature that would assist in drawing conclusions and future decision-making around knowledge hiding behaviors. It also maps out the relatively neglected areas that require more attention going forward and consequently proposes that the next decade should look forward to more compare and contrast studies from a socio-economic, cultural, product-specific, and industrial sector perspective. The study is expected to motivate academicians and researchers to advance the field theoretically by providing a constructive platform for future studies, in the process, advance the literature in this field. Further, it builds a worthwhile case for organizations to recognize the existence of knowledge hiding and judge the associated risks, benefits, and harms to make informed decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"31-52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Research on knowledge hiding has rapidly increased over the past decade, but findings have thus far not been systematically synthesized. This, therefore, has not only hampered the clarity surrounding the construct but also restricted growth in this line of research. The current study thus attempts to integrate the scattered KH literature through a systematic literature review to understand the growth of the KH construct, thereby synthesizing the extant research findings, as well as uncovering areas that require future research. Accordingly, 92 research papers were systematically searched, critically evaluated, and synthesized to make the available knowledge and evidence more accessible to scholars and practitioners. The synthesis not only answers some fundamental, yet blurred questions around the construct, but also provides a composite sense of diverse findings recorded in the extant literature that would assist in drawing conclusions and future decision-making around knowledge hiding behaviors. It also maps out the relatively neglected areas that require more attention going forward and consequently proposes that the next decade should look forward to more compare and contrast studies from a socio-economic, cultural, product-specific, and industrial sector perspective. The study is expected to motivate academicians and researchers to advance the field theoretically by providing a constructive platform for future studies, in the process, advance the literature in this field. Further, it builds a worthwhile case for organizations to recognize the existence of knowledge hiding and judge the associated risks, benefits, and harms to make informed decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织中的知识隐藏:综合文献综述及未来研究议程
近十年来,关于知识隐藏的研究迅速发展,但研究成果尚未得到系统的综合。因此,这不仅阻碍了围绕该结构的清晰度,而且限制了这一研究领域的发展。因此,本研究试图通过系统的文献综述来整合分散的KH文献,了解KH结构的发展,从而综合现有的研究成果,并发现未来需要研究的领域。因此,92篇研究论文被系统地检索、批判性地评估和综合,以使学者和从业者更容易获得可用的知识和证据。这种综合不仅回答了围绕该结构的一些基本但模糊的问题,而且还提供了现有文献中记录的各种发现的综合感觉,这些发现有助于得出结论和未来围绕知识隐藏行为的决策。它还指出了今后需要更多注意的相对被忽视的领域,因此建议下一个十年应该期待从社会经济、文化、特定产品和工业部门的角度进行更多的比较和对比研究。期望本研究能够激励学者和研究者在理论上推进该领域,为未来的研究提供建设性的平台,在此过程中推进该领域的文献。此外,它为组织认识到知识隐藏的存在并判断相关的风险、利益和危害以做出明智的决策建立了一个有价值的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Unethical favouritism and KH: The mediating role of organisational injustice The next event will be held with more quality: Identifying and prioritizing barriers to knowledge management in sports events Context-driven implementation strategies: Exploring three approaches to implement a lean capability framework within a global production company Toward effective KMS measurement: Usage statistics vs. perceived value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1