Leaching of base and metal cations from litter and soils vary in two forest stands with different tree species

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE Canadian Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1139/cjss-2023-0046
Xinyao Sun, Xinying Zhang, Fuzhong Wu, Qiuxia Wu, Jingjing Zhu, X. Ni
{"title":"Leaching of base and metal cations from litter and soils vary in two forest stands with different tree species","authors":"Xinyao Sun, Xinying Zhang, Fuzhong Wu, Qiuxia Wu, Jingjing Zhu, X. Ni","doi":"10.1139/cjss-2023-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the distribution of cations in forest soils is important for forest management. Here we evaluated the leaching of cations, potassium (K+), sodium (Na+), calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), iron (Fe3+), aluminium (Al3+), and manganese (Mn2+) from litter through soils in two forest stands with different tree species. We incubated Castanopsis carlesii leaf litter in a Castanopsis carlesii stand and Cunninghamia lanceolata needle litter in a Cunninghamia lanceolata stand using a microcosm method with monthly collections of litter and soil leachates, and the concentrations of cations and fluxes of these cations were assessed separately. We found that more Ca2+ but less Na+, Mg2+ and Fe3+ fluxes in litter leaching solutions in Cunninghamia lanceolata than in Castanopsis carlesii stand because of their different initial concentrations in fresh litter. Although cations leached from leaf litter were differed among tree species, the leaching fluxes did not vary between stands. Moreover, annual fluxes of cations leached from soils were significantly higher than those from leaf litter, leading to a net loss of soil nutrients to downstream environment. Therefore, the results suggest that reforestation with mixed stands by introducing broadleaved trees in Chinese fir monoculture plantations might reduce soil nutrient loss through the leaching pathway.","PeriodicalId":9384,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2023-0046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the distribution of cations in forest soils is important for forest management. Here we evaluated the leaching of cations, potassium (K+), sodium (Na+), calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), iron (Fe3+), aluminium (Al3+), and manganese (Mn2+) from litter through soils in two forest stands with different tree species. We incubated Castanopsis carlesii leaf litter in a Castanopsis carlesii stand and Cunninghamia lanceolata needle litter in a Cunninghamia lanceolata stand using a microcosm method with monthly collections of litter and soil leachates, and the concentrations of cations and fluxes of these cations were assessed separately. We found that more Ca2+ but less Na+, Mg2+ and Fe3+ fluxes in litter leaching solutions in Cunninghamia lanceolata than in Castanopsis carlesii stand because of their different initial concentrations in fresh litter. Although cations leached from leaf litter were differed among tree species, the leaching fluxes did not vary between stands. Moreover, annual fluxes of cations leached from soils were significantly higher than those from leaf litter, leading to a net loss of soil nutrients to downstream environment. Therefore, the results suggest that reforestation with mixed stands by introducing broadleaved trees in Chinese fir monoculture plantations might reduce soil nutrient loss through the leaching pathway.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不同树种的两种林分中,凋落物和土壤中碱和金属阳离子的淋失情况不同
了解森林土壤中阳离子的分布对森林管理很重要。在这里,我们评估了不同树种的两个林分中,垃圾中阳离子、钾(K+)、钠(Na+)、钙(Ca2+)、镁(Mg2+)、铁(Fe3+)、铝(Al3+)和锰(Mn2+)在土壤中的浸出情况。我们采用微观方法,每月收集落叶和土壤渗滤液,分别在红锥林分中培育红锥落叶和在杉木林分中培育杉木针叶,并分别评估这些阳离子的浓度和通量。我们发现,由于新鲜枯枝落叶中Ca2+、Mg2+和Fe3+的初始浓度不同,杉木枯枝落叶浸提液中的Ca2+通量比红锥高,而Na+、Mg3+和Fe3+通量却比红锥低。尽管不同树种从落叶中浸出的阳离子不同,但不同林分的浸出通量没有变化。此外,从土壤中浸出的阳离子的年通量显著高于从落叶中浸出的离子,导致土壤养分向下游环境的净损失。因此,研究结果表明,在杉木单作林中引入阔叶树进行混交林造林,可以通过淋溶途径减少土壤养分损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Soil Science
Canadian Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Soil Science is an international peer-reviewed journal published in cooperation with the Canadian Society of Soil Science. The journal publishes original research on the use, management, structure and development of soils and draws from the disciplines of soil science, agrometeorology, ecology, agricultural engineering, environmental science, hydrology, forestry, geology, geography and climatology. Research is published in a number of topic sections including: agrometeorology; ecology, biological processes and plant interactions; composition and chemical processes; physical processes and interfaces; genesis, landscape processes and relationships; contamination and environmental stewardship; and management for agricultural, forestry and urban uses.
期刊最新文献
How Does No-till Affect Soil-Profile Distribution of Roots? miyo wîcêhtowin “good relations”: reckoning with the relationship between Indigenous Peoples and soil science in Canada Analytical and Experimental Evaluation of Two-Layered Unsaturated Sand Bearing Capacity Impacts of conservation agriculture on soil C and N stocks and organic matter fractions: comparing commercial producer fields with a long-term small-plot experiment in Brown Chernozems of Saskatchewan Soil surface greenhouse gas emissions and hydro-physical properties as impacted by prairie cordgrass intercropped with kura clover
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1