A Statistical Approach to Classification: A guide to hierarchical cluster analysis in agricultural communications research

Ch'Ree Essary, L. Fischer, E. Irlbeck
{"title":"A Statistical Approach to Classification: A guide to hierarchical cluster analysis in agricultural communications research","authors":"Ch'Ree Essary, L. Fischer, E. Irlbeck","doi":"10.4148/1051-0834.2431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Classification, the sorting of similar objects or organisms into groups based on shared qualities and characteristics, is how we make sense of the world. As the field of agricultural communication and our understanding of media effects becomes more complex, it is important to have approaches that allow for a valid and reliable method of classifying units of analysis — whether they are texts, people, or other artifacts — into groups based on theoretically sound variables. This paper discusses one method of classification, the hierarchical cluster analysis, and how this method may be applied by 1) Developing Variables for Study, 2) Choosing a Sample, 3) Removing Unnecessary Variables, 4) Running the analysis, and 5) Interpreting Clusters. This professional development paper suggests this method could have positive implications for agricultural and science communication research including increased validity and reliability, rigorous development, and deeper understanding of mass communication theory. In addition, we provide recommendations for future research such as audience segmentation in agricultural and science communication research.","PeriodicalId":33763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Classification, the sorting of similar objects or organisms into groups based on shared qualities and characteristics, is how we make sense of the world. As the field of agricultural communication and our understanding of media effects becomes more complex, it is important to have approaches that allow for a valid and reliable method of classifying units of analysis — whether they are texts, people, or other artifacts — into groups based on theoretically sound variables. This paper discusses one method of classification, the hierarchical cluster analysis, and how this method may be applied by 1) Developing Variables for Study, 2) Choosing a Sample, 3) Removing Unnecessary Variables, 4) Running the analysis, and 5) Interpreting Clusters. This professional development paper suggests this method could have positive implications for agricultural and science communication research including increased validity and reliability, rigorous development, and deeper understanding of mass communication theory. In addition, we provide recommendations for future research such as audience segmentation in agricultural and science communication research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分类的统计方法:农业传播研究中的层次聚类分析指南
摘要分类,即根据共同的品质和特征将相似的物体或生物体分类,是我们理解世界的方式。随着农业传播领域和我们对媒体效应的理解变得更加复杂,重要的是要有一种有效可靠的方法,根据理论上合理的变量,将分析单元(无论是文本、人物还是其他人工制品)分类为组。本文讨论了一种分类方法,即层次聚类分析,以及如何通过1)开发研究变量,2)选择样本,3)删除不必要的变量,4)运行分析,以及5)解释聚类来应用这种方法。这篇专业发展论文表明,这种方法可以对农业和科学传播研究产生积极影响,包括提高有效性和可靠性、严格的发展以及对大众传播理论的更深理解。此外,我们还为未来的研究提供了建议,如农业和科学传播研究中的受众细分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Print Grades Prime: A quantitative analysis of producer communication preferences of U.S. beef breed association magazines through the lenses of uses, gratifications, and gatekeeping Perceptions of Science Communication’s Domain, Practices, and Identity: What Concerns Members on the Peripheral Edge of a Community of Practice Exploring Identities of Extension Faculty and Educators as Science Communicators If Nobody Hears Us, Do We Really Make a Sound? Investigating Agriculture Faculty Members’ Engagement in Science Communication The Meat of the Matter: The Effect of Science-based Information on Consumer Perception of Grass-fed Beef
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1