Air pollution and health impacts of oil & gas production in the United States

J. Buonocore, S. Reka, Do-Jin Yang, Charles Chang, Ananya Roy, T. Thompson, D. Lyon, Renee McVay, D. Michanowicz, S. Arunachalam
{"title":"Air pollution and health impacts of oil & gas production in the United States","authors":"J. Buonocore, S. Reka, Do-Jin Yang, Charles Chang, Ananya Roy, T. Thompson, D. Lyon, Renee McVay, D. Michanowicz, S. Arunachalam","doi":"10.1088/2752-5309/acc886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oil and gas production is one of the largest emitters of methane, a potent greenhouse gas and a significant contributor of air pollution emissions. While research on methane emissions from oil and gas production has grown rapidly, there is comparatively limited information on the distribution of impacts of this sector on air quality and associated health impacts. Understanding the contribution of air quality and health impacts of oil and gas can be useful for designing mitigation strategies. Here we assess air quality and human health impacts associated with ozone, fine particulate matter, and nitrogen dioxide from the oil and gas sector in the US in 2016, and compare this impact with that of the associated methane emissions. We find that air pollution in 2016 from the oil and gas sector in the US resulted in 410 000 asthma exacerbations, 2200 new cases of childhood asthma and 7500 excess deaths, with $77 billion in total health impacts. NO2 was the highest contributor to health impacts (37%) followed by ozone (35%), and then PM2.5 (28%). When monetized, these air quality health impacts of oil and gas production exceeded estimated climate impact costs from methane leakage by a factor of 3. These impacts add to the total life cycle impacts of oil and gas, and represent potential additional health benefits of strategies that reduce consumption of oil and gas. Policies to reduce oil and gas production emissions will lead to additional and significant health benefits from co-pollutant reductions that are not currently quantified or monetized.","PeriodicalId":72938,"journal":{"name":"Environmental research, health : ERH","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental research, health : ERH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/acc886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oil and gas production is one of the largest emitters of methane, a potent greenhouse gas and a significant contributor of air pollution emissions. While research on methane emissions from oil and gas production has grown rapidly, there is comparatively limited information on the distribution of impacts of this sector on air quality and associated health impacts. Understanding the contribution of air quality and health impacts of oil and gas can be useful for designing mitigation strategies. Here we assess air quality and human health impacts associated with ozone, fine particulate matter, and nitrogen dioxide from the oil and gas sector in the US in 2016, and compare this impact with that of the associated methane emissions. We find that air pollution in 2016 from the oil and gas sector in the US resulted in 410 000 asthma exacerbations, 2200 new cases of childhood asthma and 7500 excess deaths, with $77 billion in total health impacts. NO2 was the highest contributor to health impacts (37%) followed by ozone (35%), and then PM2.5 (28%). When monetized, these air quality health impacts of oil and gas production exceeded estimated climate impact costs from methane leakage by a factor of 3. These impacts add to the total life cycle impacts of oil and gas, and represent potential additional health benefits of strategies that reduce consumption of oil and gas. Policies to reduce oil and gas production emissions will lead to additional and significant health benefits from co-pollutant reductions that are not currently quantified or monetized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国石油和天然气生产对空气污染和健康的影响
石油和天然气生产是甲烷的最大排放国之一,甲烷是一种强效温室气体,也是空气污染排放的重要来源。尽管对石油和天然气生产甲烷排放的研究迅速增长,但关于该部门对空气质量影响的分布和相关健康影响的信息相对有限。了解空气质量的贡献以及石油和天然气对健康的影响有助于制定缓解策略。在这里,我们评估了2016年美国石油和天然气行业的臭氧、细颗粒物和二氧化氮对空气质量和人类健康的影响,并将其与相关甲烷排放的影响进行了比较。我们发现,2016年美国石油和天然气行业的空气污染导致410 000例哮喘恶化,2200例儿童哮喘新增病例和7500例超额死亡,对健康的总影响为770亿美元。NO2对健康影响的贡献最大(37%),其次是臭氧(35%),然后是PM2.5(28%)。如果货币化,石油和天然气生产对空气质量和健康的影响超过了甲烷泄漏对气候影响的估计成本3倍。这些影响增加了石油和天然气的整个生命周期影响,并代表了减少石油和天然气管耗战略的潜在额外健康益处。减少石油和天然气生产排放的政策将从目前尚未量化或货币化的共污染物减少中带来额外的重大健康益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emergency department visits in California associated with wildfire PM2.5: differing risk across individuals and communities. Gestational and postnatal exposure to wildfire smoke and prolonged use of respiratory medications in early life. Association of ambient air pollution and pesticide mixtures on respiratory inflammatory markers in agricultural communities. Critical windows of greenness exposure during preconception and gestational periods in association with birthweight outcomes The synergistic health impacts of exposure to multiple stressors in Tulare County, California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1