Providing Platforms

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Elementary School Journal Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1086/708665
Elizabeth L. Hale, James S. Kim
{"title":"Providing Platforms","authors":"Elizabeth L. Hale, James S. Kim","doi":"10.1086/708665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined teachers’ spontaneous low-level comprehension questions in script-supported informational read alouds, with a secondary analysis on the relationship between low- and high-level comprehension questions. Participants came from a predetermined subsample of 34 teachers and 824 third-grade students. Results revealed notable variation in the type and function of low-level questions, with some offering support for high-level questions or content learning. Although the predominance of low-level questioning patterns continues to be a challenge in many elementary classrooms, this study’s findings suggest some low-level questions play important, complementary functions in text discussions, particularly with informational text.","PeriodicalId":48010,"journal":{"name":"Elementary School Journal","volume":"120 1","pages":"555 - 579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708665","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementary School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study examined teachers’ spontaneous low-level comprehension questions in script-supported informational read alouds, with a secondary analysis on the relationship between low- and high-level comprehension questions. Participants came from a predetermined subsample of 34 teachers and 824 third-grade students. Results revealed notable variation in the type and function of low-level questions, with some offering support for high-level questions or content learning. Although the predominance of low-level questioning patterns continues to be a challenge in many elementary classrooms, this study’s findings suggest some low-level questions play important, complementary functions in text discussions, particularly with informational text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提供平台
本研究考察了教师在脚本支持的信息阅读中自发提出的低级理解问题,并对低级和高级理解问题之间的关系进行了二次分析。参与者来自预先确定的34名教师和824名三年级学生的子样本。结果显示,低级问题的类型和功能存在显著差异,一些问题为高级问题或内容学习提供了支持。尽管在许多小学课堂上,低级提问模式的主导地位仍然是一个挑战,但本研究的发现表明,一些低级提问在文本讨论中发挥着重要的互补功能,尤其是在信息文本中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Elementary School Journal
Elementary School Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching. ESJ prefers to publish original studies that contain data about school and classroom processes in elementary or middle schools while occasionally publishing integrative research reviews and in-depth conceptual analyses of schooling.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and optimization of sequence-based gene regulatory deep learning models. “It’s Just Something That You Have to Do as a Teacher” Front Matter 41 Teachers, 41 Different Ways Predictable Variation in the Implementation of a Curricular Intervention—and Why it Matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1