Proxy longitudinal indicators of household food insecurity in the UK

Neil Boyle, M. Power
{"title":"Proxy longitudinal indicators of household food insecurity in the UK","authors":"Neil Boyle, M. Power","doi":"10.35241/emeraldopenres.14311.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rising food bank usage in the UK suggests a growing prevalence of food insecurity. However, a formalised, representative measure of food insecurity was not collected in the UK until 2019, over a decade after the initial proliferation of food bank demand. In the absence of a direct measure of food insecurity, this article identifies and summarises longitudinal proxy indicators of UK food insecurity to gain insight into the growth of insecure access to food in the 21st century. Methods: A rapid evidence synthesis of academic and grey literature (2005–present) identified candidate proxy longitudinal markers of food insecurity. These were assessed to gain insight into the prevalence of, or conditions associated with, food insecurity. Results: Food bank data clearly demonstrates increased food insecurity. However, this data reflects an unrepresentative, fractional proportion of the food insecure population without accounting for mild/moderate insecurity, or those in need not accessing provision. Economic indicators demonstrate that a period of poor overall UK growth since 2005 has disproportionately impacted the poorest households, likely increasing vulnerability and incidence of food insecurity. This vulnerability has been exacerbated by welfare reform for some households. The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically intensified vulnerabilities and food insecurity. Diet-related health outcomes suggest a reduction in diet quantity/quality. The causes of diet-related disease are complex and diverse; however, evidence of socio-economic inequalities in their incidence suggests poverty, and by extension, food insecurity, as key determinants. Conclusion: Proxy measures of food insecurity suggest a significant increase since 2005, particularly for severe food insecurity. Proxy measures are inadequate to robustly assess the prevalence of food insecurity in the UK. Failure to collect standardised, representative data at the point at which food bank usage increased significantly impairs attempts to determine the full prevalence of food insecurity, understand the causes, and identify those most at risk.","PeriodicalId":91015,"journal":{"name":"Emerald open research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14311.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Rising food bank usage in the UK suggests a growing prevalence of food insecurity. However, a formalised, representative measure of food insecurity was not collected in the UK until 2019, over a decade after the initial proliferation of food bank demand. In the absence of a direct measure of food insecurity, this article identifies and summarises longitudinal proxy indicators of UK food insecurity to gain insight into the growth of insecure access to food in the 21st century. Methods: A rapid evidence synthesis of academic and grey literature (2005–present) identified candidate proxy longitudinal markers of food insecurity. These were assessed to gain insight into the prevalence of, or conditions associated with, food insecurity. Results: Food bank data clearly demonstrates increased food insecurity. However, this data reflects an unrepresentative, fractional proportion of the food insecure population without accounting for mild/moderate insecurity, or those in need not accessing provision. Economic indicators demonstrate that a period of poor overall UK growth since 2005 has disproportionately impacted the poorest households, likely increasing vulnerability and incidence of food insecurity. This vulnerability has been exacerbated by welfare reform for some households. The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically intensified vulnerabilities and food insecurity. Diet-related health outcomes suggest a reduction in diet quantity/quality. The causes of diet-related disease are complex and diverse; however, evidence of socio-economic inequalities in their incidence suggests poverty, and by extension, food insecurity, as key determinants. Conclusion: Proxy measures of food insecurity suggest a significant increase since 2005, particularly for severe food insecurity. Proxy measures are inadequate to robustly assess the prevalence of food insecurity in the UK. Failure to collect standardised, representative data at the point at which food bank usage increased significantly impairs attempts to determine the full prevalence of food insecurity, understand the causes, and identify those most at risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国家庭粮食不安全的纵向指标
背景:在英国,越来越多的食品银行的使用表明食品不安全的日益普遍。然而,直到2019年,在食品银行需求最初激增的十多年后,英国才收集到一份正式的、有代表性的食品不安全衡量标准。在缺乏粮食不安全的直接措施的情况下,本文确定并总结了英国粮食不安全的纵向代理指标,以深入了解21世纪粮食不安全获取的增长。方法:对学术文献和灰色文献(2005年至今)进行快速证据综合,确定了粮食不安全的候选代理纵向标记。对这些情况进行了评估,以深入了解粮食不安全的普遍程度或与粮食不安全有关的情况。结果:粮食银行的数据清楚地表明,粮食不安全状况正在加剧。然而,这一数据反映了粮食不安全人口中不具代表性的一小部分,没有考虑到轻度/中度不安全,或需要获得供应的人。经济指标表明,自2005年以来,英国整体经济增长不佳的时期对最贫困家庭的影响尤为严重,可能会增加粮食不安全的脆弱性和发生率。针对一些家庭的福利改革加剧了这种脆弱性。2019冠状病毒病大流行严重加剧了脆弱性和粮食不安全。与饮食有关的健康结果表明,饮食数量/质量有所下降。饮食相关疾病的病因复杂多样;然而,社会经济不平等发生率的证据表明,贫困以及粮食不安全是关键决定因素。结论:粮食不安全的替代措施表明,自2005年以来,特别是严重粮食不安全的情况显著增加。代理措施不足以有力地评估英国粮食不安全的普遍程度。如果不能在粮食银行使用率显著增加的时候收集标准化的、有代表性的数据,就会影响确定粮食不安全的普遍程度、了解原因和确定风险最大的人的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paradoxes and dilemmas of responsible leadership in the mining industries of emerging economies – it is complex Secondary school teachers' perception of quality management practices in Ethiopia: Implications for quality education for all On the global emergence of responsible leadership: purpose and social identity Estimating annual average daily traffic (AADT) data on low-volume roads with the cokriging technique and census/population data Family violence screening and disclosure response: A public mental health service consumer survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1