Creating a space for reflection on professional priorities

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Research & Method in Education Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.1080/1743727X.2022.2151999
Deniese Cox, Sarah Prestridge, S. Hodge
{"title":"Creating a space for reflection on professional priorities","authors":"Deniese Cox, Sarah Prestridge, S. Hodge","doi":"10.1080/1743727X.2022.2151999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Researchers who investigate value-laden professional practices face the challenge of creating a space in which to explore workplace priorities. Education professionals, for example, are keyed to the development and wellbeing of their students, yet frequently work in environments in which there are constraints on their practice. These professionals often have to find a balance among priorities, a process accompanied by reflection and professional conversations. For researchers seeking insight into the work of these professionals, accessing these reflections is not necessarily straightforward. This paper presents a method whereby sorting and think-aloud techniques were combined to create a space in which professionals could share reflections on professional priorities. Employing a magnetic board representing normative dimensions of high importance/low importance, and should/should not, participants were able to decide where to place magnetic labels capturing different aspects of their work. While interacting with the sorting task, participants verbalized their deliberations which were recorded, along with their label placements. Meaningful qualitative data were elicited through this process. We experienced that this combination of techniques offered an effective way of eliciting reflections and deliberations that throw light on aspects of professional work which may be less readily accessed through a traditional interview technique.","PeriodicalId":51655,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","volume":"46 1","pages":"479 - 496"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2151999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Researchers who investigate value-laden professional practices face the challenge of creating a space in which to explore workplace priorities. Education professionals, for example, are keyed to the development and wellbeing of their students, yet frequently work in environments in which there are constraints on their practice. These professionals often have to find a balance among priorities, a process accompanied by reflection and professional conversations. For researchers seeking insight into the work of these professionals, accessing these reflections is not necessarily straightforward. This paper presents a method whereby sorting and think-aloud techniques were combined to create a space in which professionals could share reflections on professional priorities. Employing a magnetic board representing normative dimensions of high importance/low importance, and should/should not, participants were able to decide where to place magnetic labels capturing different aspects of their work. While interacting with the sorting task, participants verbalized their deliberations which were recorded, along with their label placements. Meaningful qualitative data were elicited through this process. We experienced that this combination of techniques offered an effective way of eliciting reflections and deliberations that throw light on aspects of professional work which may be less readily accessed through a traditional interview technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创造一个反思职业优先事项的空间
摘要研究充满价值的职业实践的研究人员面临着创造一个探索工作场所优先事项的空间的挑战。例如,教育专业人员关注学生的发展和福祉,但他们经常在实践受到限制的环境中工作。这些专业人士往往必须在优先事项之间找到平衡,这一过程伴随着反思和专业对话。对于寻求深入了解这些专业人士工作的研究人员来说,获取这些思考并不一定很简单。本文提出了一种方法,将排序和大声思考技术结合起来,创造一个空间,让专业人士可以分享对专业优先事项的思考。使用代表高重要性/低重要性规范维度的磁板,参与者能够决定在哪里放置磁性标签,捕捉他们工作的不同方面。在与分拣任务互动时,参与者用语言表达了他们的审议情况,并记录了他们的标签位置。通过这一过程得出了有意义的定性数据。我们体验到,这种技术的结合提供了一种有效的方式来引发思考和思考,从而揭示专业工作的各个方面,而这些方面可能不太容易通过传统的面试技术获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research & Method in Education is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that draws contributions from a wide community of international researchers. Contributions are expected to develop and further international discourse in educational research with a particular focus on method and methodological issues. The journal welcomes papers engaging with methods from within a qualitative or quantitative framework, or from frameworks which cut across and or challenge this duality. Papers should not solely focus on the practice of education; there must be a contribution to methodology. International Journal of Research & Method in Education is committed to publishing scholarly research that discusses conceptual, theoretical and methodological issues, provides evidence, support for or informed critique of unusual or new methodologies within educational research and provides innovative, new perspectives and examinations of key research findings. The journal’s enthusiasm to foster debate is also recognised in a keenness to include engaged, thought-provoking response papers to previously published articles. The journal is also interested in papers that discuss issues in the teaching of research methods for educational researchers. Contributors to International Journal of Research & Method in Education should take care to communicate their findings or arguments in a succinct, accessible manner to an international readership of researchers, policy-makers and practitioners from a range of disciplines including but not limited to philosophy, sociology, economics, psychology, and history of education. The Co-Editors welcome suggested topics for future Special Issues. Initial ideas should be discussed by email with the Co-Editors before a formal proposal is submitted for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Creating effective research partnerships with rural communities: a community culture framework Socially desirable resources and activities – evaluation of a new scale for the separate measurement of economic and cultural capital in educational research Catalyzing teacher moves in small-group problem solving: a quantitative discourse analysis Qualitative research during the COVID19 pandemic: the impact of remote research on the collaborative production of methodological knowledge Teacher reflection as a research method: using phenomenology to reflect on classroom events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1