Khipu Transcription Typologies: A Corpus-Based Study of theTextos Andinos

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY Ethnohistory Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1215/00141801-8801912
Manuel F. Medrano
{"title":"Khipu Transcription Typologies: A Corpus-Based Study of theTextos Andinos","authors":"Manuel F. Medrano","doi":"10.1215/00141801-8801912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite ongoing efforts to compile both Andean khipus and their written colonial references, initiatives in this domain have emphasized the benefits of aggregation vis-à-vis preservation and diffusion, largely forgoing opportunities to analyze khipu data in aggregate. This article introduces multivariate statistical analysis to colonial khipu texts, enlisting the aid of a heretofore little-studied source: the Textos Andinos, a compilation of sixteenth-century Spanish transcriptions of Indigenous khipu “readings.” The largest syntactically annotated corpus of khipu transcriptions to date is compiled. Textual interpretation informs an exegetical typology of “paper khipus”—a division of the texts into distinguishable categories. The initial typology is expanded using the outcome of its statistical evaluation. Pre- versus postconquest content and the incorporation of currency emerge as the primary distinguishing attributes of khipu transcriptions. The expanded typology in turn enables the assessment of previous hypotheses in the study of paper khipus, responding to criticisms of their generalizability; suggestions of a diminishment in khipu complexity following the Spanish conquest are revisited and corroborated to this effect. A corpus-based study of khipu transcriptions offers a promising inroad to negotiating the highly mediated conditions of their original creation while expanding the study of khipus in the early colonial Andes. The aggregative methodology is proposed to ethnohistorians as an additional strategy for complementing and enriching historical interpretation.","PeriodicalId":51776,"journal":{"name":"Ethnohistory","volume":"68 1","pages":"311-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnohistory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-8801912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite ongoing efforts to compile both Andean khipus and their written colonial references, initiatives in this domain have emphasized the benefits of aggregation vis-à-vis preservation and diffusion, largely forgoing opportunities to analyze khipu data in aggregate. This article introduces multivariate statistical analysis to colonial khipu texts, enlisting the aid of a heretofore little-studied source: the Textos Andinos, a compilation of sixteenth-century Spanish transcriptions of Indigenous khipu “readings.” The largest syntactically annotated corpus of khipu transcriptions to date is compiled. Textual interpretation informs an exegetical typology of “paper khipus”—a division of the texts into distinguishable categories. The initial typology is expanded using the outcome of its statistical evaluation. Pre- versus postconquest content and the incorporation of currency emerge as the primary distinguishing attributes of khipu transcriptions. The expanded typology in turn enables the assessment of previous hypotheses in the study of paper khipus, responding to criticisms of their generalizability; suggestions of a diminishment in khipu complexity following the Spanish conquest are revisited and corroborated to this effect. A corpus-based study of khipu transcriptions offers a promising inroad to negotiating the highly mediated conditions of their original creation while expanding the study of khipus in the early colonial Andes. The aggregative methodology is proposed to ethnohistorians as an additional strategy for complementing and enriching historical interpretation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Khipu转录类型学:基于语料库的文本和文本研究
尽管目前正在努力编纂安第斯克普语及其书面殖民地参考文献,但这一领域的倡议强调了集合相对于-à-vis保存和传播的好处,在很大程度上放弃了对克普语数据进行综合分析的机会。本文介绍了对殖民地希普文本的多元统计分析,并利用了迄今为止很少研究的来源:Textos Andinos,这是一份16世纪西班牙语土著希普“读物”抄本的汇编。汇编了迄今为止最大的克普语抄本语法注释语料库。文本解释告知训诂类型学的“纸khipus”-划分文本到可区分的类别。最初的类型学使用其统计评估的结果进行扩展。征服前与征服后的内容和货币的结合成为希普语抄本的主要区别属性。扩展的类型学反过来又使以前的假设在论文克普斯研究的评估,回应批评他们的普遍性;关于西班牙征服后希普复杂性减少的建议被重新审视并证实了这一点。一项基于语料库的克普语转录研究,在扩大对早期殖民安第斯山脉克普语研究的同时,为谈判其原始创作的高度中介条件提供了一条有希望的途径。综合方法论作为补充和丰富历史解释的一种额外策略,被提出给民族历史学家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnohistory
Ethnohistory Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Ethnohistory reflects the wide range of current scholarship inspired by anthropological and historical approaches to the human condition. Of particular interest are those analyses and interpretations that seek to make evident the experience, organization, and identities of indigenous, diasporic, and minority peoples that otherwise elude the histories and anthropologies of nations, states, and colonial empires. The journal publishes work from the disciplines of geography, literature, sociology, and archaeology, as well as anthropology and history. It welcomes theoretical and cross-cultural discussion of ethnohistorical materials and recognizes the wide range of academic disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Dutch and Indigenous Communities in Seventeenth-Century Northeastern North America: What Archaeology, History, and Indigenous Oral Traditions Teach Us about Their Intercultural Relationships The Feast of the Nazarene of Caguach: Religious Identity, Geography, and Community in the Archipelago of Chiloé The Place-Name Analysis of the Kwupahag and Muanbissek Terms Unworthy Republic: The Dispossession of Native Americans and the Road to Indian Territory “They Will Know in the End That We Are Men”: Gunpowder and Gendered Discourse in Creek-British Diplomacy, 1763–1776
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1