Between 'creative' boost and political dysfunction: An exploration of class, culture and economic dislocation in East Berlin

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Urban Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1386/jucs_00012_1
T. Blokland, Sebastian Juhnke
{"title":"Between 'creative' boost and political dysfunction: An exploration of class, culture and economic dislocation in East Berlin","authors":"T. Blokland, Sebastian Juhnke","doi":"10.1386/jucs_00012_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In cities where tourism, creative industries and new service economies are boosting, the continuing impact of de-industrialization is less prominent than in discussions of, for example, former Rustbelt cities. Yet, these cities display new forms of intra-urban inequalities\n that are, beyond the discussion of gentrification, not strongly visible in urban sociology discourses. While scholarly work on Berlin focuses on its gentrification and touristification, urban social movements and forms of migration, less attention is paid to the city as a site of de-industrialization,\n economic dislocation, class-based defamations and the resulting labelling of political dysfunctionality of certain parts of the population. Exploring the less visible yet ongoing effects of de-industrialization in the post-socialist context of a formerly divided city, this article contributes\n to a better conceptual understanding of the economic dislocation of the (previous) working classes of East Berlin. It is argued that effects of deindustrialization are related to the cultural and relational production of class through the organization of socialist industrial work and that\n these effects are ongoing, yet silenced. Lastly, the article outlines a set of hypotheses regarding the friction of a decreasing public, yet continued personal relevance of industrial and working-class heritage, socially and materially, in the city.","PeriodicalId":36149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Cultural Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jucs_00012_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In cities where tourism, creative industries and new service economies are boosting, the continuing impact of de-industrialization is less prominent than in discussions of, for example, former Rustbelt cities. Yet, these cities display new forms of intra-urban inequalities that are, beyond the discussion of gentrification, not strongly visible in urban sociology discourses. While scholarly work on Berlin focuses on its gentrification and touristification, urban social movements and forms of migration, less attention is paid to the city as a site of de-industrialization, economic dislocation, class-based defamations and the resulting labelling of political dysfunctionality of certain parts of the population. Exploring the less visible yet ongoing effects of de-industrialization in the post-socialist context of a formerly divided city, this article contributes to a better conceptual understanding of the economic dislocation of the (previous) working classes of East Berlin. It is argued that effects of deindustrialization are related to the cultural and relational production of class through the organization of socialist industrial work and that these effects are ongoing, yet silenced. Lastly, the article outlines a set of hypotheses regarding the friction of a decreasing public, yet continued personal relevance of industrial and working-class heritage, socially and materially, in the city.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在“创造性”提升和政治功能失调之间——对东柏林阶级、文化和经济错位的探索
摘要在旅游业、创意产业和新服务经济蓬勃发展的城市,去工业化的持续影响不如前乡村地带城市的讨论那么突出。然而,这些城市显示出新形式的城市内部不平等,这些不平等在城市社会学话语中并不明显,超出了士绅化的讨论范围。虽然关于柏林的学术工作侧重于其绅士化和旅游化、城市社会运动和移民形式,但很少关注这座城市作为去工业化、经济错位、基于阶级的诽谤以及由此产生的对某些人口政治功能失调的标签。在一个以前分裂的城市的后社会主义背景下,探索去工业化的不太明显但持续的影响,这篇文章有助于更好地从概念上理解东柏林(以前)工人阶级的经济错位。有人认为,去工业化的影响与阶级通过组织社会主义工业工作的文化和关系生产有关,这些影响是持续的,但被压制了。最后,文章概述了一组关于城市中工业和工人阶级遗产在社会和物质上不断减少的公众但持续的个人相关性的摩擦的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Cultural Studies
Journal of Urban Cultural Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
‘To live in a city is to consume its offerings’: Speculative fiction and gentrification in Ling Ma’s Severance (2018) ‘My father’s village, my city’: Place-making in the cinema of NCR Expanded narratives of gentrification: Mobility, infrastructure and urban change in 1970s London literature Chris Ware’s Building Stories jigsaw puzzle (2021) Representing a long emergency: New approaches to urban change in literary and cultural studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1