Unambivalent about Ambivalence in the Politics of Mourning

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.3167/dt.2018.050210
G. Snyder
{"title":"Unambivalent about Ambivalence in the Politics of Mourning","authors":"G. Snyder","doi":"10.3167/dt.2018.050210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What does a democratically-productive form of mourning\nlook like in America? David McIvor’s Mourning in America and Simon Stow’s\nAmerican Mourning argue that it entails the embrace of ambivalence about\nself and other. Democratically-productive mourning pushes against the tendencies\ntoward idealization and demonization. Embracing ambivalence enables\nus to move to more effective political engagement in the context of\nboth collaboration and conflict. It allows us to understand that the process\nof mourning must be ongoing both to protect us from political excesses to\nwhich we are prone and to push society toward justice.","PeriodicalId":42255,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/dt.2018.050210","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democratic Theory-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What does a democratically-productive form of mourning look like in America? David McIvor’s Mourning in America and Simon Stow’s American Mourning argue that it entails the embrace of ambivalence about self and other. Democratically-productive mourning pushes against the tendencies toward idealization and demonization. Embracing ambivalence enables us to move to more effective political engagement in the context of both collaboration and conflict. It allows us to understand that the process of mourning must be ongoing both to protect us from political excesses to which we are prone and to push society toward justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哀悼政治中的歧义
在美国,一种民主生产的哀悼形式是什么样子的?大卫·麦克伊沃的《美国的哀悼》和西蒙·斯托的《美国哀悼》认为,它包含了对自我和他人的矛盾心理。民主的富有成效的哀悼反对倾向性的理想化和妖魔化。接受矛盾心理使我们能够在合作和冲突的背景下进行更有效的政治参与。它让我们明白,哀悼的过程必须持续下去,既要保护我们免受我们所倾向的政治过度,又要推动社会走向正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Democratic Theory is a peer-reviewed journal published and distributed by Berghahn. It encourages philosophical and interdisciplinary contributions that critically explore democratic theory—in all its forms. Spanning a range of views, the journal offers a cross-disciplinary forum for diverse theoretical questions to be put forward and systematically examined. It advances non-Western as well as Western ideas and is actively based on the premise that there are many forms of democracies and many types of democrats. As a forum for debate, the journal challenges theorists to ask and answer the perennial questions that plague the field of democratization studies: Why is democracy so prominent in the world today? What is the meaning of democracy? Will democracy continue to expand? Are current forms of democracy sufficient to give voice to “the people” in an increasingly fragmented and divided world? Who leads in democracy? What types of non-Western democratic theories are there? Should democrats always defend democracy? Should democrats be fearful of de-democratization, post-democracies, and the rise of hybridized regimes?
期刊最新文献
Chinese Contemplations on Utopian and Dystopian Democratic Governance Socialist Democracy Conceptualizing Difference West By Not West Democracies Across Cultures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1