Legal and Practical Aspects of Child Custody, Visitation and Maintenance: A Case Study in SNNP Regional State

Q4 Social Sciences Mizan Law Review Pub Date : 2018-03-23 DOI:10.4314/MLR.V11I2.2
Nigussie Afesha
{"title":"Legal and Practical Aspects of Child Custody, Visitation and Maintenance: A Case Study in SNNP Regional State","authors":"Nigussie Afesha","doi":"10.4314/MLR.V11I2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although divorce disrupts the marital bond thereby terminating marital rights and obligations, each parent’s obligations to the wellbeing and upbringing of children (custody, visitation rights, and maintenance) persists. This article examines the practice of courts with regard to child custody, visitation rights and obligation to supply maintenance in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) Regional State. The experience of various court decisions in SNNP Regional State with respect to these matters is explored. Since the laws do not have detailed provisions that regulate the various issues of child custody, visitation and child support, there is inconsistency in judicial decisions. Many decisions do not distinguish between physical and legal custody. As a result, the legal and physical custody of the child usually rest on the same person. With regard to visitation, there is variation in court decisions although the conventional arrangement seems standard visitation. In some cases, courts specify the duration and form of visitation. However, in many cases, courts do not indicate how and when visitation shall be allowed. There are cases where courts overlook the issue of visitation. There is also inconsistency in court decisions with regard to child support. These problems call for detail provisions to ensure consistency and predictability in child custody, visitation and child support decisions. Key terms Family · Divorce · Child custody · Visitation · Maintenance","PeriodicalId":30178,"journal":{"name":"Mizan Law Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"275-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/MLR.V11I2.2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizan Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/MLR.V11I2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although divorce disrupts the marital bond thereby terminating marital rights and obligations, each parent’s obligations to the wellbeing and upbringing of children (custody, visitation rights, and maintenance) persists. This article examines the practice of courts with regard to child custody, visitation rights and obligation to supply maintenance in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) Regional State. The experience of various court decisions in SNNP Regional State with respect to these matters is explored. Since the laws do not have detailed provisions that regulate the various issues of child custody, visitation and child support, there is inconsistency in judicial decisions. Many decisions do not distinguish between physical and legal custody. As a result, the legal and physical custody of the child usually rest on the same person. With regard to visitation, there is variation in court decisions although the conventional arrangement seems standard visitation. In some cases, courts specify the duration and form of visitation. However, in many cases, courts do not indicate how and when visitation shall be allowed. There are cases where courts overlook the issue of visitation. There is also inconsistency in court decisions with regard to child support. These problems call for detail provisions to ensure consistency and predictability in child custody, visitation and child support decisions. Key terms Family · Divorce · Child custody · Visitation · Maintenance
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童监护、探视和抚养的法律和实践问题——以SNNP地区州为例
尽管离婚破坏了婚姻纽带,从而终止了婚姻权利和义务,但父母双方对孩子的健康和养育(监护权、探视权和赡养)的义务仍然存在。本文审查了南方民族和人民地区州法院在儿童监护权、探视权和提供抚养费义务方面的做法。探讨了SNNP地区州在这些问题上的各种法院判决的经验。由于法律没有对儿童监护、探视和儿童抚养等各种问题作出详细规定,司法裁决存在不一致之处。许多判决没有区分实际监护和法律监护。因此,孩子的法律和实际监护权通常由同一个人承担。关于探视,尽管传统的探视安排似乎是标准探视,但法院的裁决也有所不同。在某些情况下,法院规定了探视的期限和形式。然而,在许多情况下,法院没有说明如何以及何时允许探视。有些情况下,法院忽视了探视问题。法院在儿童抚养方面的裁决也不一致。这些问题需要详细的规定,以确保儿童监护、探视和儿童抚养决定的一致性和可预测性。关键词家庭·离婚·子女监护权·探视·赡养
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Formalization of Rural Women’s Land Rights in a Plural Justice System: The Case of the Sidama Regional State Concurrence of Crimes under Ethiopian Law: General Principles vis-à-vis Tax Law Regulation of Group of Companies in Ethiopia: A Comparative Overview Private Security Companies in Ethiopia: An Insight from a Rights Perspective Business and Human Rights in Ethiopia: The Status of the Law and the Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1