We Who Were Slaves

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES Souls Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10999949.2019.1608108
Anthony Bogues
{"title":"We Who Were Slaves","authors":"Anthony Bogues","doi":"10.1080/10999949.2019.1608108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Working from the injunction of C. L. R. James about the requirement to understand the “new forms created in the context of slavery,” this essay argues that there is a political requirement for the study of the intellectual history and political thought of the African enslaved. The essay also notes that the Black enslaved body represented a distinct form of labor in which it produced commodities while itself being a “property in person.” Such a historical process produced “thingfication,” and unique forms of domination and alternative frameworks of freedom.","PeriodicalId":44850,"journal":{"name":"Souls","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10999949.2019.1608108","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Souls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2019.1608108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Working from the injunction of C. L. R. James about the requirement to understand the “new forms created in the context of slavery,” this essay argues that there is a political requirement for the study of the intellectual history and political thought of the African enslaved. The essay also notes that the Black enslaved body represented a distinct form of labor in which it produced commodities while itself being a “property in person.” Such a historical process produced “thingfication,” and unique forms of domination and alternative frameworks of freedom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们是奴隶
从c.l.r.詹姆斯关于理解“在奴隶制背景下创造的新形式”的要求出发,本文认为对非洲奴隶的思想史和政治思想的研究有一个政治要求。这篇文章还指出,黑人被奴役的身体代表了一种独特的劳动形式,在这种劳动形式中,它生产商品,同时本身也是一种“人身财产”。这样一个历史过程产生了“事物化”,以及独特的统治形式和自由的替代框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Souls
Souls ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Black Construction of Colonialism: The Black Marxist Response to Fascism in the 1930s “Shame Upon the Guilty City”: Riots and White Rage in the American Past and Present The Burning House: Revolution and Black Art The Struggle for International Political Recognition for New Afrikan/Black Freedom Fighters To My Son Tupac
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1