Information asymmetry and REITs’ excess dividends: US and European market comparison

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Property Investment & Finance Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.1108/jpif-07-2020-0080
G. Morri, Federico Palmieri, E. Sironi
{"title":"Information asymmetry and REITs’ excess dividends: US and European market comparison","authors":"G. Morri, Federico Palmieri, E. Sironi","doi":"10.1108/jpif-07-2020-0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants that lead REITs to pay out more dividends than the required level to retain their tax-favored status. In particular, the focus is on the effect that information asymmetry has on REITs’ excess dividends distribution.Design/methodology/approachA sample of 341 REITs from the USA, France, the UK, Spain, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and Italy has been analyzed for the period 2000–2016. Employing multiple linear regression models, the effects of information asymmetry, cash flow, size, ROA, leverage and treasury shares on excess dividends have been explored.FindingsResults indicate that REITs with greater information asymmetry distribute significantly more excess dividends, with superior evidence in Europe than in the USA. Regarding other determinants, cash flow influences excess dividends the most, whereas ROA and common shares repurchase have an inverse relationship with excess dividends.Practical implicationsThe paper explores the effects of excess dividends distribution on the most relevant REITs features. The joint analysis of the European and the US samples allows this study to make a comparison between the two markets and to identify affinities and differences.Originality/valueThe paper tests whether a proxy of asymmetry information plays a role in affecting the excess dividends distribution. In contrast to previous researches, it expands the analysis by comparing the US and European markets to underline any difference in the effect of asymmetry information on excess dividends. The topic has never been investigated before in relation to the European market.","PeriodicalId":46429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Investment & Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Investment & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpif-07-2020-0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to analyze the determinants that lead REITs to pay out more dividends than the required level to retain their tax-favored status. In particular, the focus is on the effect that information asymmetry has on REITs’ excess dividends distribution.Design/methodology/approachA sample of 341 REITs from the USA, France, the UK, Spain, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and Italy has been analyzed for the period 2000–2016. Employing multiple linear regression models, the effects of information asymmetry, cash flow, size, ROA, leverage and treasury shares on excess dividends have been explored.FindingsResults indicate that REITs with greater information asymmetry distribute significantly more excess dividends, with superior evidence in Europe than in the USA. Regarding other determinants, cash flow influences excess dividends the most, whereas ROA and common shares repurchase have an inverse relationship with excess dividends.Practical implicationsThe paper explores the effects of excess dividends distribution on the most relevant REITs features. The joint analysis of the European and the US samples allows this study to make a comparison between the two markets and to identify affinities and differences.Originality/valueThe paper tests whether a proxy of asymmetry information plays a role in affecting the excess dividends distribution. In contrast to previous researches, it expands the analysis by comparing the US and European markets to underline any difference in the effect of asymmetry information on excess dividends. The topic has never been investigated before in relation to the European market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息不对称与REITs超额分红:美国和欧洲市场比较
目的本研究的目的是分析导致房地产投资信托基金支付超过所需水平的股息以保持其税收优惠地位的决定因素。重点研究了信息不对称对REITs超额股利分配的影响。设计/方法/方法对2000-2016年期间来自美国、法国、英国、西班牙、比利时、德国、荷兰和意大利的341个reit样本进行了分析。运用多元线性回归模型,探讨了信息不对称、现金流、规模、资产收益率、杠杆率和库存量股对超额股利的影响。研究结果表明,信息不对称程度越高的REITs所分配的超额股息显著多于信息不对称程度越高的REITs。在其他决定因素中,现金流量对超额股息的影响最大,而ROA和普通股回购与超额股息呈反比关系。本文探讨了超额股利分配对房地产投资信托基金最相关特征的影响。对欧洲和美国样本的联合分析使本研究能够对两个市场进行比较,并确定相似性和差异。原创性/价值本文检验了信息不对称的代理是否影响超额股利分配。与之前的研究相反,本文通过比较美国和欧洲市场来扩展分析,以强调信息不对称对超额股息影响的任何差异。这个话题以前从未被调查过,与欧洲市场有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Fully refereed papers on practice and methodology in the UK, continental Western Europe, emerging markets of Eastern Europe, China, Australasia, Africa and the USA, in the following areas: ■Academic papers on the latest research, thinking and developments ■Law reports assessing new legislation ■Market data for a comprehensive review of current research ■Practice papers - a forum for the exchange of ideas and experiences
期刊最新文献
Client influence or the valuer's behavior? An empirical study of listed companies' valuation in Taiwan The influence mechanism of real estate enterprises' status on debt default risk Exploring the predictive power of ANN and traditional regression models in real estate pricing: evidence from Prishtina Real Estate Insights Back to the basics of sustainability The role of multi-family properties in hedging pension liability risk: long-run evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1