Zoe Staines, Kiah Smith, Stefanie Plage, Lutfun Nahar Lata, Suzanna Fay, Zhaoxi Zheng, Laura Simpson Reeves, Helen Beazley, Ella Kuskoff, Andrew Clarke, Glenys McGowan, Lynda Shevellar, Jonathan Prangnell
{"title":"Social science as social action to address inequalities","authors":"Zoe Staines, Kiah Smith, Stefanie Plage, Lutfun Nahar Lata, Suzanna Fay, Zhaoxi Zheng, Laura Simpson Reeves, Helen Beazley, Ella Kuskoff, Andrew Clarke, Glenys McGowan, Lynda Shevellar, Jonathan Prangnell","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In its most recent report, the Academy of the Social Sciences Australia (ASSA, 2021: 10) identified social inequality as a “grand challenge” for the social sciences, arguing that social scientists have a pivotal role to play in “understanding, addressing and guiding us towards a narrowing of a two-tier society.” Nevertheless, the social sciences continue to be regularly positioned as “soft” and esoteric in relation to the natural sciences, while also sustaining disproportionate funding cuts. In this article, we—a multidisciplinary group of social science researchers forming part of the Inequalities and Social Action Research Cluster based at The University of Queensland (Australia)—draw on the existing literature and our diverse experiences to reflexively consider how academic social scientists might play the active role that ASSA foresees to address social inequalities into the future. This includes by countering the inherent imperialism of the Western academy itself. We explore the roles, barriers and tensions that social scientists face and conclude by offering a framework of key strategies to improve the translational impacts of social science research for addressing social inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"59 1","pages":"108-127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.272","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In its most recent report, the Academy of the Social Sciences Australia (ASSA, 2021: 10) identified social inequality as a “grand challenge” for the social sciences, arguing that social scientists have a pivotal role to play in “understanding, addressing and guiding us towards a narrowing of a two-tier society.” Nevertheless, the social sciences continue to be regularly positioned as “soft” and esoteric in relation to the natural sciences, while also sustaining disproportionate funding cuts. In this article, we—a multidisciplinary group of social science researchers forming part of the Inequalities and Social Action Research Cluster based at The University of Queensland (Australia)—draw on the existing literature and our diverse experiences to reflexively consider how academic social scientists might play the active role that ASSA foresees to address social inequalities into the future. This includes by countering the inherent imperialism of the Western academy itself. We explore the roles, barriers and tensions that social scientists face and conclude by offering a framework of key strategies to improve the translational impacts of social science research for addressing social inequalities.
澳大利亚社会科学院(ASSA, 2021: 10)在其最新的报告中将社会不平等现象视为社会科学的 "重大挑战",认为社会科学家在 "理解、解决和引导我们缩小两级社会 "方面可以发挥关键作用。然而,与自然科学相比,社会科学仍然经常被定位为 "软 "学科和深奥学科,同时还承受着不成比例的资金削减。在本文中,我们--澳大利亚昆士兰大学 "不平等与社会行动研究集群"(Inequalities and Social Action Research Cluster)的一个多学科社会科学研究人员小组--以现有文献和我们的不同经验为基础,反思学术界的社会科学家如何才能在解决未来的社会不平等问题上发挥ASSA所预见的积极作用。这包括反对西方学术界本身固有的帝国主义。我们探讨了社会科学家面临的角色、障碍和紧张关系,最后提出了一个关键战略框架,以提高社会科学研究在解决社会不平等问题方面的转化影响。