Perceived Income Inequality, Trust, and Consumers’ Ethical Judgments

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Macromarketing Pub Date : 2023-07-13 DOI:10.1177/02761467231187306
Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury
{"title":"Perceived Income Inequality, Trust, and Consumers’ Ethical Judgments","authors":"Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury","doi":"10.1177/02761467231187306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research related to consumers’ ethical judgments has generally neglected the effects of psycho-social variables (variables with both social and personal psychological components), e.g., perceived income inequality and subjective socio-economic status. In order to address this gap, an online survey of 373 US consumers was conducted to examine relationships between perceived income inequality and judgments regarding unethical and prosocial consumer actions. The mediating role of trust (general distrust of others and distrust of corporations) and moderating role of subjective socio-economic status were examined. Moderated mediation analyses demonstrated that the effects of perceived income inequality on consumers’ ethical judgments were mediated by distrust of corporations (but not by general distrust of others), for consumers who had higher subjective socio-economic status. These novel findings related to the effects of distrust of corporations highlight that, in order to explain consumers’ ethical judgments, it is essential to focus on trust relationships between consumers and other participants in the marketing system. Perceived income inequality erodes trust within marketing systems leading to negative effects on consumers’ ethical judgments. These effects are paradoxically only evident among consumers with higher subjective socio-economic status. Findings contribute to the macromarketing literature on marketing systems, marketing ethics, sustainable consumption, and distributive justice.","PeriodicalId":47896,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Macromarketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Macromarketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467231187306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research related to consumers’ ethical judgments has generally neglected the effects of psycho-social variables (variables with both social and personal psychological components), e.g., perceived income inequality and subjective socio-economic status. In order to address this gap, an online survey of 373 US consumers was conducted to examine relationships between perceived income inequality and judgments regarding unethical and prosocial consumer actions. The mediating role of trust (general distrust of others and distrust of corporations) and moderating role of subjective socio-economic status were examined. Moderated mediation analyses demonstrated that the effects of perceived income inequality on consumers’ ethical judgments were mediated by distrust of corporations (but not by general distrust of others), for consumers who had higher subjective socio-economic status. These novel findings related to the effects of distrust of corporations highlight that, in order to explain consumers’ ethical judgments, it is essential to focus on trust relationships between consumers and other participants in the marketing system. Perceived income inequality erodes trust within marketing systems leading to negative effects on consumers’ ethical judgments. These effects are paradoxically only evident among consumers with higher subjective socio-economic status. Findings contribute to the macromarketing literature on marketing systems, marketing ethics, sustainable consumption, and distributive justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收入不平等、信任与消费者的道德判断
与消费者道德判断相关的研究通常忽略了心理-社会变量(具有社会和个人心理成分的变量)的影响,例如感知的收入不平等和主观社会经济地位。为了解决这一差距,对373名美国消费者进行了一项在线调查,以考察感知到的收入不平等与对不道德和亲社会消费者行为的判断之间的关系。考察了信任的中介作用(对他人的普遍不信任和对公司的不信任)和主观社会经济地位的调节作用。适度中介分析表明,对于主观社会经济地位较高的消费者来说,感知到的收入不平等对消费者道德判断的影响是通过对公司的不信任(而不是通过对他人的普遍不信任)来中介的。这些与对企业的不信任影响有关的新发现强调,为了解释消费者的道德判断,必须关注消费者与营销系统中其他参与者之间的信任关系。感知到的收入不平等会侵蚀营销系统内的信任,从而对消费者的道德判断产生负面影响。矛盾的是,这些影响只有在主观社会经济地位较高的消费者中才明显。研究结果有助于宏观营销文献中关于营销系统、营销伦理、可持续消费和分配正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
25.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Macromarketing is primarily a marketing journal (although it includes a wide range of social science disciplines) that focuses on important societal issues as they are affected by marketing and on how society affects the conduct of marketing. The journal covers macromarketing areas such as marketing and public policy, marketing and development, marketing and the quality of life, and the history of marketing.
期刊最新文献
Refocusing and Futuring Perspectives on AI in Marketing Partnerships as Strategy in Macro-Social Marketing A Transformative Orientation Model for Encouraging Responsible Marketing Actions Visualizing Macomarketing: StoryMaps for the Technology-Infused Classroom Book Review: Community, Economy and COVID-19: Lessons from Multi-Country Analyses of a Global Pandemic by Clifford J. Shultz, II, Don R. Rahtz, M. Joseph Sirgy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1