Following the chain of command? How managers balance benefits and risks in granting autonomy to employees

IF 7.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2022.08.007
Sander van Triest , Christopher Williams
{"title":"Following the chain of command? How managers balance benefits and risks in granting autonomy to employees","authors":"Sander van Triest ,&nbsp;Christopher Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2022.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate how managers trade off the benefits of delegating authority to their employees with the risk of loss of control. Organizational economics theory identifies specific knowledge of subordinates and monitoring possibilities for the manager as determinants of delegation. Social learning theory predicts that when unit managers are themselves granted more authority, they will pass this on to their employees. This cascading of authority reduces the fear of loss of control associated with delegation. Using a survey among 215 unit managers in professional services firms, we find that managers delegate more authority to employees in their unit when those employees have more specific knowledge, when there are more exceptions in employee tasks, and when monitoring costs are lower. We also find support for the cascading effect: decentralization to the manager is positively related to autonomy granted to employees, while it moderates the effects of specific knowledge and monitoring costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"Pages 89-97"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322001141/pdfft?md5=5fb1724ccfd872359c2637409523de44&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237322001141-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322001141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate how managers trade off the benefits of delegating authority to their employees with the risk of loss of control. Organizational economics theory identifies specific knowledge of subordinates and monitoring possibilities for the manager as determinants of delegation. Social learning theory predicts that when unit managers are themselves granted more authority, they will pass this on to their employees. This cascading of authority reduces the fear of loss of control associated with delegation. Using a survey among 215 unit managers in professional services firms, we find that managers delegate more authority to employees in their unit when those employees have more specific knowledge, when there are more exceptions in employee tasks, and when monitoring costs are lower. We also find support for the cascading effect: decentralization to the manager is positively related to autonomy granted to employees, while it moderates the effects of specific knowledge and monitoring costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服从指挥链?在授予员工自主权时,管理者如何平衡利益与风险
我们研究了管理者如何权衡将权力下放给员工所带来的好处和失去控制的风险。组织经济学理论认为,下属的具体知识和管理者的监督可能性是授权的决定因素。社会学习理论预测,当单位管理者自己被授予更多权力时,他们会将这些权力传递给员工。这种逐级授权的做法减少了因授权而失去控制权的担忧。通过对专业服务公司 215 名部门经理的调查,我们发现,当员工拥有更多具体知识、员工任务中存在更多例外情况以及监督成本较低时,经理会将更多权力下放给本部门的员工。我们还发现了连带效应:向经理下放权力与授予员工自主权呈正相关,而经理下放权力会缓和特定知识和监控成本的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The need to belong: Relational coping strategies in the face of coworker envy Decomposing profile-to-role configurations in R&D-focused entrepreneurial teams Leadership identity construction in a hybrid medical context: ‘Claimed’ but not ‘granted’ Leader's relational power and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of perceived organizational support for creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1