Impossible History? Holocaust Commissions as Narrators of Trauma

Yod Pub Date : 2018-02-14 DOI:10.4000/yod.2595
Alexander Karn
{"title":"Impossible History? Holocaust Commissions as Narrators of Trauma","authors":"Alexander Karn","doi":"10.4000/yod.2595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historical commissions have played an important role in the most recent efforts to garner restitution and reparations for Holocaust victims and their families. Several dozen Holocaust commissions were convened in the late‑1990s and early‑2000s in European countries where histories of collaboration and complicity with the Nazi regime were either under‑documented or suppressed in the official discourse. This essay examines the Holocaust commissions from a historiographical perspective with special attention given to the methodological and rhetorical strategies they employed when confronted by the traumatic experiences and memories of victims and survivors. While the work of these commissions was shaped and influenced, to varying degrees, by external political forces and interest groups, this essay explores the ways in which “the politics of history” entered into their written reports and, consequently, obscured and silenced fundamental aspects of Holocaust history. Three commissions, in particular, are held up for scrutiny (i.e., Austria’s Jabloner Commission, the International Commission for Holocaust‑Era Insurance Claims, and France’s Matteoli Commission), and an assessment of their work is given against the backdrop of ongoing debates within the field of trauma studies and in response to questions concerning the Holocaust and the “limits of representation.”","PeriodicalId":53276,"journal":{"name":"Yod","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yod","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/yod.2595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Historical commissions have played an important role in the most recent efforts to garner restitution and reparations for Holocaust victims and their families. Several dozen Holocaust commissions were convened in the late‑1990s and early‑2000s in European countries where histories of collaboration and complicity with the Nazi regime were either under‑documented or suppressed in the official discourse. This essay examines the Holocaust commissions from a historiographical perspective with special attention given to the methodological and rhetorical strategies they employed when confronted by the traumatic experiences and memories of victims and survivors. While the work of these commissions was shaped and influenced, to varying degrees, by external political forces and interest groups, this essay explores the ways in which “the politics of history” entered into their written reports and, consequently, obscured and silenced fundamental aspects of Holocaust history. Three commissions, in particular, are held up for scrutiny (i.e., Austria’s Jabloner Commission, the International Commission for Holocaust‑Era Insurance Claims, and France’s Matteoli Commission), and an assessment of their work is given against the backdrop of ongoing debates within the field of trauma studies and in response to questions concerning the Holocaust and the “limits of representation.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不可能的历史?大屠杀委员会作为创伤的讲述者
历史委员会在最近为大屠杀受害者及其家属争取恢复和赔偿的努力中发挥了重要作用。20世纪90年代末和21世纪初,欧洲国家成立了几十个大屠杀委员会,这些国家与纳粹政权合作和共谋的历史要么没有记录在案,要么在官方话语中遭到压制。本文从史学角度考察了大屠杀委员会,特别关注他们在面对受害者和幸存者的创伤经历和记忆时所采用的方法和修辞策略。虽然这些委员会的工作在不同程度上受到外部政治力量和利益集团的塑造和影响,但本文探讨了“历史政治”进入其书面报告的方式,从而模糊和沉默了大屠杀历史的基本方面。其中有三个委员会(即奥地利的雅布勒纳委员会、国际大屠杀时期保险索赔委员会和法国的马特奥利委员会)特别受到审查,并在创伤研究领域内正在进行的辩论的背景下,针对有关大屠杀和“代表性限制”的问题,对它们的工作进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Yod
Yod
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
“ze davar shehu ktsat muzar [That’s a thing which is a bit strange]”:The |ze (copula) NP she‑Relative Clause|—Construction in Spoken Hebrew DiscourseDiscussion The Uncanny Meeting Point of Languages: Hebrew in G. Shofman and David Vogel’s Vienna Fautes de grammaire ou grammaire des fautes ? Or: Should Hebrew Speakers Be Afraid of Linguists? Bridge over Troubled Water: Spelling Accuracy of Novel Phonemes in Arabic among Native Hebrew‑Speaking Pupils in a Bilingual—Arabic‑Hebrew—Elementary School Léger comme le faon, fort comme un lion. Nouvelles considérations sur « La compétition des poètes » : la mise en abyme du poète dans le troisième conte (maḥberet) du Sefer ha‑meshalim de Yaakov?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1