The effects of collective bargaining systems on the productivity function of firms: An analysis of bargaining structures and processes and the implications for policy making

IF 1.6 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL Pub Date : 2021-04-04 DOI:10.1111/irj.12325
Bernd Brandl, Nils Braakmann
{"title":"The effects of collective bargaining systems on the productivity function of firms: An analysis of bargaining structures and processes and the implications for policy making","authors":"Bernd Brandl,&nbsp;Nils Braakmann","doi":"10.1111/irj.12325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, individual and company bargaining have increasingly supplanted sector and country collective bargaining leading to increasingly heterogeneous and perforated, that is, hybrid, national collective bargaining systems. Little is known about the relative effects of these different systems. In this paper, the authors derive and test a comprehensive categorization of collective bargaining systems and argue that different systems are associated with different production functions and therefore have different effects on labour productivity. The hypotheses are tested using representative workplace-level data for all member states of the European Union. It is found that the performance of coordinated sector collective bargaining systems is higher than for all other forms of collective and individual bargaining. Policy implications of the results are discussed as these results challenge attempts to reform collective bargaining in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"52 3","pages":"218-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/irj.12325","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irj.12325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In recent years, individual and company bargaining have increasingly supplanted sector and country collective bargaining leading to increasingly heterogeneous and perforated, that is, hybrid, national collective bargaining systems. Little is known about the relative effects of these different systems. In this paper, the authors derive and test a comprehensive categorization of collective bargaining systems and argue that different systems are associated with different production functions and therefore have different effects on labour productivity. The hypotheses are tested using representative workplace-level data for all member states of the European Union. It is found that the performance of coordinated sector collective bargaining systems is higher than for all other forms of collective and individual bargaining. Policy implications of the results are discussed as these results challenge attempts to reform collective bargaining in Europe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集体谈判制度对企业生产力功能的影响:对谈判结构和过程的分析及其对政策制定的影响
近年来,个人和公司的集体谈判日益取代部门和国家的集体谈判,导致越来越多样化和穿孔,即混合的国家集体谈判系统。人们对这些不同系统的相对影响知之甚少。在本文中,作者推导并检验了集体谈判制度的全面分类,并认为不同的制度与不同的生产功能有关,因此对劳动生产率有不同的影响。这些假设是使用欧盟所有成员国具有代表性的工作场所级别数据进行测试的。研究发现,协调部门集体谈判系统的绩效高于所有其他形式的集体和个人谈判。讨论了这些结果的政策含义,因为这些结果挑战了欧洲集体谈判改革的尝试。所有谈判系统中表现最差的(Boeri,2014),因为我们的结果表明,多级集体谈判系统的表现取决于各级谈判单位的协调。事实上,我们的研究结果表明,协调是集体谈判制度效力的关键因素,因此也是绩效的关键因素。因此,这与最近基于替代操作和协调概念的其他研究一致,如经合组织(2019)。一方面,本文的结果表明,在没有协调的情况下,多级谈判系统与弱绩效有关,在某些条件下,甚至与负绩效有关。后一种效应可以解释为,如果存在更高级别协议的漏洞,它们结合了可能的部门卡特尔效应和谈判单位搭便车激励的所有不利因素。另一方面,研究结果表明,如果多层次系统相互协调,它们就有可能系统地优于其他谈判系统。这样,他们就需要将结果的成本和收益内化,并使不同级别的谈判单位能够根据单位和领域的具体情况灵活调整谈判结果。无法提供此类单元的完整概述,以及
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Trade-union engendered employee trust in senior management: A case study of digitalisation Introducing sectoral bargaining in the United Kingdom: Why it makes sense and how it might be done Creating a local managerial regime in global context: The case of the Bangladesh ready-made garment sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1