The financial burden of imaging tests conducted in the emergency department of a teaching hospital: a brief report

Sahar Mirbaha, M. Forouzanfar, Amin Saberinia, A. Salimi, Hamid Kariman, Mozhgan Farmahini Farahani
{"title":"The financial burden of imaging tests conducted in the emergency department of a teaching hospital: a brief report","authors":"Sahar Mirbaha, M. Forouzanfar, Amin Saberinia, A. Salimi, Hamid Kariman, Mozhgan Farmahini Farahani","doi":"10.15171/jept.2019.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objective: Each imaging technique has a special application and usage, and should be used in the right situation. Physicians choose the type of imaging technique by considering the type of tissue and the benefits and disadvantages of the imaging method as well as its financial burden on the patient. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost of imaging tests performed in the emergency department (ED) of an educational hospital and determine their financial burden on both the patients and the healthcare system of the country. Methods: This retrospective descriptive cross-sectional single-center study was conducted in Shohadaye Tajrish, an educational hospital, during one year. The study population consisted of all patients who had undergone some type of imaging (CT scan, ultrasound, radiography, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) in the ED. The information was collected using a predesigned checklist. The costs of a variety of imaging methods for patients referred to the ED were calculated using different types of accounting units and PACS system. Results: The number of patients who visited the ED of the studied hospital during a one year period was 63507. The total cost of performing different types of imaging methods in the studied center throughout the one-year target period was 44018695695 Rials (≃$US 423745) (59.27% of which was spent on CT scan, 16.09% on ultrasound, 13.75% on plain radiography and 10.87% on MRI). Conclusion: According to the collected data, the total cost of radiology was 44018695695 Rials. The highest cost was related to CT scan modality, and the lowest belonged to MRI.","PeriodicalId":36499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15171/jept.2019.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Each imaging technique has a special application and usage, and should be used in the right situation. Physicians choose the type of imaging technique by considering the type of tissue and the benefits and disadvantages of the imaging method as well as its financial burden on the patient. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost of imaging tests performed in the emergency department (ED) of an educational hospital and determine their financial burden on both the patients and the healthcare system of the country. Methods: This retrospective descriptive cross-sectional single-center study was conducted in Shohadaye Tajrish, an educational hospital, during one year. The study population consisted of all patients who had undergone some type of imaging (CT scan, ultrasound, radiography, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) in the ED. The information was collected using a predesigned checklist. The costs of a variety of imaging methods for patients referred to the ED were calculated using different types of accounting units and PACS system. Results: The number of patients who visited the ED of the studied hospital during a one year period was 63507. The total cost of performing different types of imaging methods in the studied center throughout the one-year target period was 44018695695 Rials (≃$US 423745) (59.27% of which was spent on CT scan, 16.09% on ultrasound, 13.75% on plain radiography and 10.87% on MRI). Conclusion: According to the collected data, the total cost of radiology was 44018695695 Rials. The highest cost was related to CT scan modality, and the lowest belonged to MRI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学医院急诊科影像检查的经济负担:简要报告
目的:每种成像技术都有其特殊的应用和用途,应该在正确的情况下使用。医生通过考虑组织类型、成像方法的优缺点及其对患者的经济负担来选择成像技术的类型。本研究的目的是估计在教育医院急诊科(ED)进行的影像学检查的成本,并确定其对患者和国家医疗系统的经济负担。方法:这项回顾性描述性横断面单中心研究在教育医院Shohadaye Tajrish进行,为期一年。研究人群包括所有在ED中接受过某种类型成像(CT扫描、超声、射线照相、磁共振成像[MRI])的患者。使用预先设计的检查表收集信息。使用不同类型的会计单位和PACS系统计算转诊至ED的患者的各种成像方法的成本。结果:在一年内,访问研究医院急诊室的患者人数为63507人。在一年的目标期内,在研究中心执行不同类型成像方法的总成本为44018695695里亚尔(423745美元)(其中59.27%用于CT扫描,16.09%用于超声,13.75%用于平片放射照相,10.87%用于MRI)。结论:根据收集的数据,放射科的总费用为44018695695里亚尔。成本最高的是CT扫描方式,最低的是MRI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rhabdomyolysis following electical injury without acute kidney injury Relationship between cardiac ultrasound findings during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the outcome of patients Using Weibull model of survival analysis workflow and its relevant factors: A prospective cohort study Comparing the effectiveness of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in the prophylaxis of wound infection in hand laceration Post-traumatic growth and perceived social support in young adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1