A meta-analysis of the moderating role of prior learning experience and mandatory participation on factors influencing MOOC learners’ continuance intention

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.14742/ajet.7795
Min Zhang, Sihong Li, Yan Zhang
{"title":"A meta-analysis of the moderating role of prior learning experience and mandatory participation on factors influencing MOOC learners’ continuance intention","authors":"Min Zhang, Sihong Li, Yan Zhang","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retaining learners has been an important issue for massive open online course (MOOC) platforms. Given the different, and even contradictory, conclusions in studies on the continuance intention of MOOC learners, this study selected 53 highly correlated empirical studies published from 2008 to 2022 and constructed a research model based on visual knowledge map analysis. Meta-analysis was applied to identify the key factors, and subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the moderating effect of mandatory participation and prior learning experience. The results show that attitude and satisfaction play the most significant role. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, confirmation, social influence, perceived enjoyment, outcome expectation, self-efficacy and task-technology fit all play essential functions, while the direct impact of social presence requires further research. Prior learning experience and mandatory participation have moderating effects on perceived usefulness. MOOC developers should make more efforts and improvements in content quality, social quality and service quality.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nLearners’ continuance intention can be enhanced by improving individual perceived positive feelings related to MOOCs and individual satisfaction with MOOC platforms.\nDirectors of mandatory courses in MOOCs should place greater emphasis on improving learners’ perceived ease of use of MOOC platforms.\nSuperintendents of MOOC platforms need to be aware of the role of perceived usefulness of learners with less prior learning experience in their continuance intention.","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retaining learners has been an important issue for massive open online course (MOOC) platforms. Given the different, and even contradictory, conclusions in studies on the continuance intention of MOOC learners, this study selected 53 highly correlated empirical studies published from 2008 to 2022 and constructed a research model based on visual knowledge map analysis. Meta-analysis was applied to identify the key factors, and subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the moderating effect of mandatory participation and prior learning experience. The results show that attitude and satisfaction play the most significant role. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, confirmation, social influence, perceived enjoyment, outcome expectation, self-efficacy and task-technology fit all play essential functions, while the direct impact of social presence requires further research. Prior learning experience and mandatory participation have moderating effects on perceived usefulness. MOOC developers should make more efforts and improvements in content quality, social quality and service quality. Implications for practice or policy: Learners’ continuance intention can be enhanced by improving individual perceived positive feelings related to MOOCs and individual satisfaction with MOOC platforms. Directors of mandatory courses in MOOCs should place greater emphasis on improving learners’ perceived ease of use of MOOC platforms. Superintendents of MOOC platforms need to be aware of the role of perceived usefulness of learners with less prior learning experience in their continuance intention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先前学习经验和强制参与对MOOC学习者继续学习意愿影响因素的调节作用meta分析
对于大规模在线开放课程(MOOC)平台来说,留住学习者一直是一个重要问题。鉴于MOOC学习者继续意愿研究中存在不同甚至矛盾的结论,本研究选取了2008年至2022年发表的53项高度相关的实证研究,构建了基于视觉知识地图分析的研究模型。采用meta分析确定关键因素,并采用亚组分析探讨强制参与和先前学习经验的调节作用。结果表明,态度和满意度在其中起着最显著的作用。感知有用性、感知易用性、确认性、社会影响力、感知享受、结果期望、自我效能感和任务-技术契合度都发挥着必不可少的作用,而社会存在的直接影响有待进一步研究。先前学习经验和强制性参与对感知有用性有调节作用。MOOC开发者应该在内容质量、社交质量和服务质量上做出更多的努力和提高。对实践或政策的启示:通过提高个人感知到的与MOOC相关的积极感受和个人对MOOC平台的满意度,可以增强学习者的继续学习意愿。MOOC必修课程的负责人应该更加重视提高学习者对MOOC平台使用的易用性。MOOC平台的管理者需要意识到先前学习经验较少的学习者的感知有用性在其继续学习意愿中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
How to sustain a centralised approach to learning design Privacy versus pedagogy – students’ perceptions of using learning analytics in higher education Access and Participation: The use of Technologies as tools for Inclusion by Spanish University Lecturers The effects of visualisation literacy and data storytelling dashboards on teachers’ cognitive load Students got mail: Do students read semi-tailored emails and what is the impact?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1