A MULTI-MODEL APPROACH TO ASSESS THE RELATIVE WEIGHTS AND SENSITIVITIES OF THE FACTORS OF REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS

IF 0.8 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis Pub Date : 2021-02-03 DOI:10.37043/JURA.2021.13.1.3
Shahid Rahmat, Joydeep Sen
{"title":"A MULTI-MODEL APPROACH TO ASSESS THE RELATIVE WEIGHTS AND SENSITIVITIES OF THE FACTORS OF REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS","authors":"Shahid Rahmat, Joydeep Sen","doi":"10.37043/JURA.2021.13.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to prioritize the intervention to augment regional competitiveness, it is essential to assess the relative weights and sensitivities related to the factors of competitiveness. Improper assignment of relative weights is prominent in the case when multi-co-linearity exists among independent variables. The paper tests the suitability of multiple models for their capacity of assessing relative weights, and subsequently for forming a competitiveness index. The relative weights of critical components of economic infrastructure have been assessed with Zero-order correlation, Structure coefficient analysis, Beta coefficient analysis, Product measure analysis, Relative weight analysis, and Commonality analysis. Subsequently, regional competitiveness indices have been formed with relative weights as a linear combination. The most suitable technique to form an index has been identified through the Pearson correlation and Spearman rank correlation analyses. Multiple regression analysis assigns the relative weights and consecutively forms the regional competitiveness index, better than other applied techniques. Zero-order correlation and Structural coefficient analysis performed reasonably well. Commonality analysis is a very appropriate technique for the detailed investigation of unique and shared effects among variables. The result shows that the common effects of the critical components of the economic infrastructure are stronger than their unique effects. The sensitivity of competitiveness related to the variables has been assessed through Artificial Neural Network. Regional competitiveness is most sensitive to the variable of rural roads. The results indicate that better connectivity triggers capital and labor drain from the rural areas of the region.","PeriodicalId":54010,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2021.13.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In order to prioritize the intervention to augment regional competitiveness, it is essential to assess the relative weights and sensitivities related to the factors of competitiveness. Improper assignment of relative weights is prominent in the case when multi-co-linearity exists among independent variables. The paper tests the suitability of multiple models for their capacity of assessing relative weights, and subsequently for forming a competitiveness index. The relative weights of critical components of economic infrastructure have been assessed with Zero-order correlation, Structure coefficient analysis, Beta coefficient analysis, Product measure analysis, Relative weight analysis, and Commonality analysis. Subsequently, regional competitiveness indices have been formed with relative weights as a linear combination. The most suitable technique to form an index has been identified through the Pearson correlation and Spearman rank correlation analyses. Multiple regression analysis assigns the relative weights and consecutively forms the regional competitiveness index, better than other applied techniques. Zero-order correlation and Structural coefficient analysis performed reasonably well. Commonality analysis is a very appropriate technique for the detailed investigation of unique and shared effects among variables. The result shows that the common effects of the critical components of the economic infrastructure are stronger than their unique effects. The sensitivity of competitiveness related to the variables has been assessed through Artificial Neural Network. Regional competitiveness is most sensitive to the variable of rural roads. The results indicate that better connectivity triggers capital and labor drain from the rural areas of the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域竞争力各因素相对权重和敏感性的多模型评估方法
为了确定提高区域竞争力的干预措施的优先顺序,有必要评估与竞争力因素相关的相对权重和敏感性。当自变量之间存在多重共线性时,相对权值分配不当是一个突出问题。本文测试了多个模型的适用性,以评估其相对权重的能力,并随后形成竞争力指数。采用零阶相关分析、结构系数分析、贝塔系数分析、产品测度分析、相对权重分析和通用性分析等方法对经济基础设施关键组成部分的相对权重进行了评价。随后,以相对权重为线性组合形成区域竞争力指数。通过Pearson相关分析和Spearman秩相关分析,确定了形成指数的最合适技术。多元回归分析赋予相对权重,连续形成区域竞争力指数,优于其他应用方法。零级相关分析和结构系数分析效果较好。共性分析是一种非常适合详细研究变量之间的独特和共享效应的技术。结果表明,经济基础设施关键组成部分的共同效应强于其独特效应。通过人工神经网络对各变量对竞争力的敏感性进行了评价。区域竞争力对农村公路变量最为敏感。研究结果表明,互联互通的改善引发了该地区农村地区资本和劳动力的外流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
DEMOGRAPHIC AND PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF GENTRIFICATION IN RELATION TO RESILIENCE OF URBAN LOCALITIES: CASE STUDY OF THE RENOVATED DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF PRAGUE TOWARDS A REGIONAL CROSSOVER MODEL? THE ROLES PLAYED BY SPATIAL VICINITY AND CULTURAL PROXIMITY AMONG ETHNIC MINORITIES IN AN EAST-CENTRAL EUROPEAN BORDERLAND CLUSTERING AND MULTINOMIAL LOGIT ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING HOUSEHOLD RESIDENTIAL LOCATION CHOICE IN THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA MOBILITY AS CENTRAL ELEMENT IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: FROM ACCELERATION TO CONTAINMENT. EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS FROM GALICIA (SPAIN) ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE ON NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILITY IN CYBERJAYA, MALAYSIA: A GLOBAL TECHNOLOGICAL HUB
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1