Usability of a Mobile Application for Patients Rehabilitating in their Community

Jeanette R. Little, Holly H. Pavliscsak, Mabel R Cooper, L. A. Goldstein, J. Tong, Stephanie J. Fonda
{"title":"Usability of a Mobile Application for Patients Rehabilitating in their Community","authors":"Jeanette R. Little, Holly H. Pavliscsak, Mabel R Cooper, L. A. Goldstein, J. Tong, Stephanie J. Fonda","doi":"10.7309/JMTM.6.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methods: Data were from the intervention arm (n=95) of a 36-week, randomized controlled trial. Usability was measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS) (n=41) and semi-structured interviews (n=49). The analysis compared SUS scores by cohort characteristics, with t-tests and ANOVA. Interview responses were coded for valence. Pearson correlations quantified the association between SUS scores and usage.","PeriodicalId":87305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"14-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7309/JMTM.6.3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Methods: Data were from the intervention arm (n=95) of a 36-week, randomized controlled trial. Usability was measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS) (n=41) and semi-structured interviews (n=49). The analysis compared SUS scores by cohort characteristics, with t-tests and ANOVA. Interview responses were coded for valence. Pearson correlations quantified the association between SUS scores and usage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动应用程序在社区康复患者的可用性
方法:数据来自干预组(n=95),为期36周的随机对照试验。可用性采用系统可用性量表(SUS) (n=41)和半结构化访谈(n=49)进行测量。分析通过队列特征比较SUS评分,采用t检验和方差分析。访谈回答是根据效价进行编码的。Pearson相关性量化了SUS评分和使用情况之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serological prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among prison system workers in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, 2020. Evaluating Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine-based Care Models in Dermatology An Affordable Smart Phone Communication System from Highway to Helipad: A Case Series Myanmar is Ready to Engage mHealth Applications for Improved Postoperative Care A Mobile Electronic Record for Lifestyle Coaches in Gestational Diabetes Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1