Application of The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Method in Determining Musrenbang Results in Batu Bara District

Muhammad Yasin Simargolang, Mawar Nur Fazira
{"title":"Application of The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Method in Determining Musrenbang Results in Batu Bara District","authors":"Muhammad Yasin Simargolang, Mawar Nur Fazira","doi":"10.24114/cess.v8i2.48931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penerapan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dapat membantu sistem dalam menentukan hasil Musrenbang berdasarkan urutan prioritas tertinggi. Pada penelitian ini penerapan metode AHP untuk menentukan hasil akhir musrenbang melibatkan tiga parameter sebagai kriteria yaitu Bidang Kegiatan, Biaya, dan Urutan Prioritas. Masing-masing parameter memiliki sub kategori yang mewakili nilai setiap parameter. Parameter Bidang Kegiatan memiliki tiga sub kategori yaitu infrastruktur, bidang ekonomi, dan sosial budaya. Parameter Biaya memiliki tiga sub kategori yaitu biaya rendah, biaya sedang, dan biaya tinggi. Dan parameter Urutan Prioritas memiliki tiga sub kategori yaitu prioritas tinggi, prioritas sedang, dan prioritas rendah. Berdasarkah hasil pengujian, didapatkan bobot untuk parameter bidang kegiatan yaitu 0.22, bobot parameter biaya yaitu 0.13, dan bobot urutan prioritas yaitu 0.65. Pada sub kategori parameter bidang kegiatan, bidang infrastruktur memiliki bobot sebesar 0.71, bidang ekonomi dan sosial budaya memiliki bobot sebesar 0.14. Pada sub kategori biaya, biaya rendah memiliki bobot sebesar 0.68, biaya sedang memiliki bobot sebesar 0.23, dan biaya tinggi memiliki bobot 0.09. Dan pada sub kategori parameter urutan prioritas, prioritas tinggi memiliki bobot sebesar 0.76, prioritas sedang memiliki bobot sebesar 0.15, dan prioritas rendah memiliki bobot sebesar 0.08. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa sistem yang dibangun mampu mengurutkan usulan kegiatan musrenbang berdasarkan prioritas tertinggi).  The application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method can assist the system in determining Musrenbang results based on the highest priority order. In this study the application of the AHP method to determine the final results of the Musrenbang involved three parameters as criteria, namely Activities, Costs, and Order of Priority. Each parameter has a sub category that represents the value of each parameter. Parameter Field of Activity has three sub-categories, namely infrastructure, economics, and socio-culture. The Cost Parameter has three sub-categories namely low cost, medium cost, and high cost. And the Priority Order parameter has three sub-categories, namely high priority, medium priority, and low priority. Based on the test results, the weight for the parameter of the activity field is 0.22, the weight for the cost parameter is 0.13, and the priority order weight is 0.65. In the sub category of activity parameters, the infrastructure sector has a weight of 0.71, the economic and socio-cultural fields have a weight of 0.14. In the cost sub category, low costs have a weight of 0.68, moderate costs have a weight of 0.23, and high costs have a weight of 0.09. And in the priority order parameter sub category, high priority has a weight of 0.76, medium priority has a weight of 0.15, and low priority has a weight of 0.08. The test results show that the system built is able to sort the proposed musrenbang activities based on the highest priority). ","PeriodicalId":53361,"journal":{"name":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v8i2.48931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Penerapan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dapat membantu sistem dalam menentukan hasil Musrenbang berdasarkan urutan prioritas tertinggi. Pada penelitian ini penerapan metode AHP untuk menentukan hasil akhir musrenbang melibatkan tiga parameter sebagai kriteria yaitu Bidang Kegiatan, Biaya, dan Urutan Prioritas. Masing-masing parameter memiliki sub kategori yang mewakili nilai setiap parameter. Parameter Bidang Kegiatan memiliki tiga sub kategori yaitu infrastruktur, bidang ekonomi, dan sosial budaya. Parameter Biaya memiliki tiga sub kategori yaitu biaya rendah, biaya sedang, dan biaya tinggi. Dan parameter Urutan Prioritas memiliki tiga sub kategori yaitu prioritas tinggi, prioritas sedang, dan prioritas rendah. Berdasarkah hasil pengujian, didapatkan bobot untuk parameter bidang kegiatan yaitu 0.22, bobot parameter biaya yaitu 0.13, dan bobot urutan prioritas yaitu 0.65. Pada sub kategori parameter bidang kegiatan, bidang infrastruktur memiliki bobot sebesar 0.71, bidang ekonomi dan sosial budaya memiliki bobot sebesar 0.14. Pada sub kategori biaya, biaya rendah memiliki bobot sebesar 0.68, biaya sedang memiliki bobot sebesar 0.23, dan biaya tinggi memiliki bobot 0.09. Dan pada sub kategori parameter urutan prioritas, prioritas tinggi memiliki bobot sebesar 0.76, prioritas sedang memiliki bobot sebesar 0.15, dan prioritas rendah memiliki bobot sebesar 0.08. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa sistem yang dibangun mampu mengurutkan usulan kegiatan musrenbang berdasarkan prioritas tertinggi).  The application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method can assist the system in determining Musrenbang results based on the highest priority order. In this study the application of the AHP method to determine the final results of the Musrenbang involved three parameters as criteria, namely Activities, Costs, and Order of Priority. Each parameter has a sub category that represents the value of each parameter. Parameter Field of Activity has three sub-categories, namely infrastructure, economics, and socio-culture. The Cost Parameter has three sub-categories namely low cost, medium cost, and high cost. And the Priority Order parameter has three sub-categories, namely high priority, medium priority, and low priority. Based on the test results, the weight for the parameter of the activity field is 0.22, the weight for the cost parameter is 0.13, and the priority order weight is 0.65. In the sub category of activity parameters, the infrastructure sector has a weight of 0.71, the economic and socio-cultural fields have a weight of 0.14. In the cost sub category, low costs have a weight of 0.68, moderate costs have a weight of 0.23, and high costs have a weight of 0.09. And in the priority order parameter sub category, high priority has a weight of 0.76, medium priority has a weight of 0.15, and low priority has a weight of 0.08. The test results show that the system built is able to sort the proposed musrenbang activities based on the highest priority). 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AHP(层次分析法)方法在巴图巴拉地区Musrenbang结果确定中的应用
层次分析法(AHP)可以帮助系统根据最高优先级序列确定Musrenbang结果。在本研究中,应用AHP方法确定坍塌的最终结果涉及三个参数作为标准,即活动范围、成本和优先级。每个参数都有一个子类别,表示每个参数的值。活动范围参数有三个子类别:基础设施、经济和社会。成本参数有三个子类别:低成本、当前成本和高成本。优先级顺序参数有三个子类别:高优先级、当前优先级和低优先级。根据测试结果,活动参数0.22得到一个bob,成本参数0.13得到一个子,优先级序列0.65得到一子。在活动领域参数的子类别中,基础设施的峰值为0.71,经济和社会部门的峰值为0.14。在成本子类别中,低成本的棉花为0.68,当前成本的棉花是0.23,而高成本的棉花则是0.09。在子类别优先级序列参数中,高优先级的bob为0.76,优先级为0.15,低优先级为0.08。测试结果表明,所构建的系统能够根据最高优先级组织所提出的蘑菇活动)。[UNK]层次分析法(AHP)的应用可以帮助系统根据最高优先级确定Musrenbang结果。在本研究中,应用AHP方法确定Musrenbang的最终结果涉及三个参数作为标准,即活动、成本和优先级。参数%1有一个子类别表示每个参数的值。每个参数都有一个子分类表示每个参数值。参数活动领域有三个子类别,即基础设施、经济和社会文化。成本参数有三个子类别,即低成本、中等成本和高成本。优先级顺序参数有三个子类别,即高优先级、中优先级和低优先级。根据测试结果,活动字段的参数权重为0.22,成本参数权重为0.13,优先级顺序权重为0.65。在活动参数的子类别中,基础设施部门的权重为0.71,经济和社会文化领域的权重为0.14。在成本子类别中,低成本具有0.68的权重,中等成本具有0.23的权重,而高成本具有0.09的权重。在优先级顺序参数子类别中,高优先级具有0.76的权重,中等优先级具有0.15的权重,低优先级具有0.08的权重。测试结果表明,所构建的系统能够根据最高优先级对所提出的musrenbang活动进行排序)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of the Multimedia Development Life Cycle in Making Educational Games About Indonesia Data Mining Algorithm Decision Tree Itterative Dechotomiser 3 (ID3) for Classification of Stroke Implementation of Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) on the Selection of Online English Course Platforms Usability of Brain Tumor Detection Using the DNN (Deep Neural Network) Method Based on Medical Image on DICOM Performance Comparison Analysis of Multi Prime RSA and Multi Power RSA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1