Inter- and Intra-physician variation in quantifying actinic keratosis skin photodamage.

Schmeusser, J. Travers, Borchers, J. Trevino, Kellawan, L. Carpenter, S. Bahl, C. Rohan, E. Muennich, S. Guenthner, H. Hahn, Ali M Rkein, Mousdicas, E. Cates, U. Sunar
{"title":"Inter- and Intra-physician variation in quantifying actinic keratosis skin photodamage.","authors":"Schmeusser, J. Travers, Borchers, J. Trevino, Kellawan, L. Carpenter, S. Bahl, C. Rohan, E. Muennich, S. Guenthner, H. Hahn, Ali M Rkein, Mousdicas, E. Cates, U. Sunar","doi":"10.13188/2373-1044.1000065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated the variations in physician evaluation of skin photodamage based on a published photodamage scale. Of interest is the utility of a 10-level scale ranging from none and mild photodamage to actinic keratosis (AK). The dorsal forearms of 55 adult subjects with various amounts of photodamage were considered. Each forearm was independently evaluated by 15 board-certified dermatologists according to the Global Assessment Severity Scale ranging from 0 (less severe) to 9 (the most progressed stage of skin damage). Dermatologists rated the levels of photodamage based upon the photographs in blinded fashion. Results show substantial disagreement amongst the dermatologists on the severity of photodamage. Our results indicate that ratings could be more consistent if using a scale of less levels (5-levels or 3-levels). Ultimately, clinicians can use this knowledge to provide better interpretation of inter-rater evaluations and provide more reliable assessment and frequent monitoring of high-risk populations.","PeriodicalId":73660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and investigative dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and investigative dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13188/2373-1044.1000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the variations in physician evaluation of skin photodamage based on a published photodamage scale. Of interest is the utility of a 10-level scale ranging from none and mild photodamage to actinic keratosis (AK). The dorsal forearms of 55 adult subjects with various amounts of photodamage were considered. Each forearm was independently evaluated by 15 board-certified dermatologists according to the Global Assessment Severity Scale ranging from 0 (less severe) to 9 (the most progressed stage of skin damage). Dermatologists rated the levels of photodamage based upon the photographs in blinded fashion. Results show substantial disagreement amongst the dermatologists on the severity of photodamage. Our results indicate that ratings could be more consistent if using a scale of less levels (5-levels or 3-levels). Ultimately, clinicians can use this knowledge to provide better interpretation of inter-rater evaluations and provide more reliable assessment and frequent monitoring of high-risk populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化光化性角化病皮肤光损伤的医师之间和医师内部差异。
我们根据公布的光损伤量表调查了医生评估皮肤光损伤的差异。我们感兴趣的是从无和轻度光损伤到光化性角化病(AK)的10级量表的效用。研究了55例不同程度光损伤的成人前臂背侧。每个前臂由15名委员会认证的皮肤科医生根据全球评估严重程度量表进行独立评估,范围从0(较轻)到9(最严重的皮肤损伤阶段)。皮肤科医生以盲法根据照片对光损伤程度进行评级。结果显示,皮肤科医生对光损伤的严重程度存在实质性分歧。我们的结果表明,如果使用较少级别的量表(5级或3级),评分可能更加一致。最终,临床医生可以利用这些知识来更好地解释评分者之间的评估,并提供更可靠的评估和对高危人群的频繁监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uncommon Petaloid Form of Seborrheic Dermatitis Seen in Fitzpatrick Skin Types V-VI. Evaluation of A Natural Anti- Dandruff Technology in a Shampoo Formulation via In-vivo and In-vitro Methods Digital Dermoscopy, Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, and Pigmented Lesion Assay Gep for In-Vivo Monitoring of Multiple Halo Nevi on an Adult Patient Role of Malassezia furfur and M. globosa in Dandruff and Seborrheic Dermatitis Mycosis Fungoides Presenting After Dupilumab Therapy: Case Report and Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1