{"title":"The Man Who Loved Children: Lewis Carroll Studies' Evidence Problem","authors":"Katherine Wakely-Mulroney","doi":"10.7560/jhs30301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T h e y e a r 2 0 2 1 m a r k s T h e sesquicentenary of Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There, a work that, like its forerunner, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865), has never gone out of print.1 While it would be difficult to overstate the importance of Carroll’s conceptualization of childhood to modern culture, discussions concerning the nature of his feelings toward Alice Liddell, his muse, and his fascination with female children and adolescents more broadly have lasted almost as long as the books themselves. This subject attracted critical attention as early as 1898, when Stewart Dodgson Collingwood dedicated the final two chapters of his eleven-chapter biography to “that beautiful side of [his uncle’s] character which afterwards was to be, next to his fame as an author, the one for which he was best known—his attitude towards children, and the strong attraction they had for him.” Reflecting on this attraction, Collingwood proposed that the “one comprehensive word wide enough to explain this tendency of his nature” would be “Love” and that it is only in light of this love “that we can properly understand him.”2 Throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, literary critics, biographers, and historians of childhood, sexuality, and art have drawn on the tremendous range of primary source materials that constitute Carroll’s archive (including fiction, correspondence, diaries, photography, and sketches) to approach the vexed question of what it might mean to love a child in a period governed by different social and sexual codes from the present. The author’s enduring popularity means that this topic will continue to be studied against the backdrop of changing cultural discourses. Attitudes toward the sexual preferences of prominent men have shifted dramatically in recent years, with many formerly beloved figures scrutinized","PeriodicalId":45704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","volume":"30 1","pages":"335 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/jhs30301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
T h e y e a r 2 0 2 1 m a r k s T h e sesquicentenary of Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There, a work that, like its forerunner, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1865), has never gone out of print.1 While it would be difficult to overstate the importance of Carroll’s conceptualization of childhood to modern culture, discussions concerning the nature of his feelings toward Alice Liddell, his muse, and his fascination with female children and adolescents more broadly have lasted almost as long as the books themselves. This subject attracted critical attention as early as 1898, when Stewart Dodgson Collingwood dedicated the final two chapters of his eleven-chapter biography to “that beautiful side of [his uncle’s] character which afterwards was to be, next to his fame as an author, the one for which he was best known—his attitude towards children, and the strong attraction they had for him.” Reflecting on this attraction, Collingwood proposed that the “one comprehensive word wide enough to explain this tendency of his nature” would be “Love” and that it is only in light of this love “that we can properly understand him.”2 Throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, literary critics, biographers, and historians of childhood, sexuality, and art have drawn on the tremendous range of primary source materials that constitute Carroll’s archive (including fiction, correspondence, diaries, photography, and sketches) to approach the vexed question of what it might mean to love a child in a period governed by different social and sexual codes from the present. The author’s enduring popularity means that this topic will continue to be studied against the backdrop of changing cultural discourses. Attitudes toward the sexual preferences of prominent men have shifted dramatically in recent years, with many formerly beloved figures scrutinized
刘易斯·卡罗尔(Lewis Carroll)的《透过镜子》(Through the Looking Glass)和《爱丽丝在那里发现了什么》(What Alice Found There)问世一百周年,这部作品与它的前身《爱丽丝梦游仙境》(Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland,1865)一样,从未绝版,关于他对缪斯女神爱丽丝·利德尔感情的本质,以及他对女性儿童和青少年的迷恋的讨论,持续的时间几乎与书籍本身一样长。早在1898年,斯图尔特·道奇森·科林伍德(Stewart Dodgson Collingwood。“反思这种吸引力,科林伍德提出,“一个足够广泛的词来解释他天性中的这种倾向”应该是“爱”,只有在这种爱的背景下,我们才能正确地理解他。”2在整个二十世纪和二十一世纪,文学评论家、传记作家和儿童、性、,和艺术利用卡罗尔档案中的大量原始材料(包括小说、信件、日记、摄影和素描)来解决一个棘手的问题,即在一个与现在不同的社会和性规范所统治的时代,爱一个孩子意味着什么。作者的持续受欢迎意味着这一主题将在不断变化的文化话语背景下继续被研究。近年来,人们对知名男性性偏好的态度发生了巨大变化,许多以前备受喜爱的人物都受到了仔细审视