Word- and Text-Level Reading Difficulties in Students With Dyslexia

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Learning Disability Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-08-11 DOI:10.1177/07319487211037256
Elizabeth B. Meisinger, A. M. Breazeale, Lyle H. Davis
{"title":"Word- and Text-Level Reading Difficulties in Students With Dyslexia","authors":"Elizabeth B. Meisinger, A. M. Breazeale, Lyle H. Davis","doi":"10.1177/07319487211037256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine whether group-based differences exist in word- and text-level reading in a clinical sample of students with dyslexia, and to shed light on the cognitive processes supporting these essential skills. Second- through seventh-grade students were administered a battery of standardized measures of cognitive processing skills (phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming [RAN], and verbal short-term memory), word reading skills (decoding and word identification), oral text reading (fluency and comprehension), and silent text reading (fluency and comprehension). Word- and text-level reading skills were used to place students into the following groups: text fluency deficit, globally impaired, and partially remediated. Results replicated the existence of a text fluency deficit group. Reader group differences in terms of cognitive processing skills were less pronounced than expected, with only phonological awareness differentiating among them. Phonological awareness and RAN emerged as the important contributors to reading skill, though their relative contributions varied across word- and text-level measures. Together, these results point to importance of considering text-level reading processes across modality in both research and clinical contexts.","PeriodicalId":47365,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disability Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disability Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487211037256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether group-based differences exist in word- and text-level reading in a clinical sample of students with dyslexia, and to shed light on the cognitive processes supporting these essential skills. Second- through seventh-grade students were administered a battery of standardized measures of cognitive processing skills (phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming [RAN], and verbal short-term memory), word reading skills (decoding and word identification), oral text reading (fluency and comprehension), and silent text reading (fluency and comprehension). Word- and text-level reading skills were used to place students into the following groups: text fluency deficit, globally impaired, and partially remediated. Results replicated the existence of a text fluency deficit group. Reader group differences in terms of cognitive processing skills were less pronounced than expected, with only phonological awareness differentiating among them. Phonological awareness and RAN emerged as the important contributors to reading skill, though their relative contributions varied across word- and text-level measures. Together, these results point to importance of considering text-level reading processes across modality in both research and clinical contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读障碍学生的语篇阅读困难
本研究的目的是检验在阅读障碍学生的临床样本中,单词和文本水平的阅读是否存在基于群体的差异,并阐明支持这些基本技能的认知过程。二年级至七年级的学生接受了一系列标准化的认知处理技能测量(语音意识、快速自动命名[RAN]和言语短期记忆)、单词阅读技能(解码和单词识别)、口语文本阅读(流利性和理解力)和默语文本阅读(流畅性和理解能力)。使用单词和文本水平的阅读技能将学生分为以下几组:文本流利性缺陷、整体受损和部分补救。结果表明存在一个文本流利性缺陷组。读者群体在认知加工技能方面的差异没有预期的那么明显,只有语音意识在他们之间存在差异。语音意识和RAN是阅读技能的重要贡献者,尽管它们的相对贡献在单词和文本水平上各不相同。总之,这些结果表明,在研究和临床背景下,跨模态考虑文本水平阅读过程的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Learning Disability Quarterly publishes high-quality research and scholarship concerning children, youth, and adults with learning disabilities. Consistent with that purpose, the journal seeks to publish articles with the potential to impact and improve educational outcomes, opportunities, and services.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Phonological Decoding on the Reading Skills of Beginning Readers With Reading Disabilities in a Highly Transparent Orthography The Effects of a Morphological Awareness Intervention on Reading and Spelling Ability of Children With Dyslexia Synthesis of Writing Intervention Studies for English Learners With Learning Disabilities Parental Allyship for Children With Dyslexia: A Conceptual Lens on Disability Experience Current Research Informing the Conceptualization of STEM Interventions for Students With LD: An Introduction to the Special Series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1