Między archiwistyką a architekturą informacji

W. Roman
{"title":"Między archiwistyką a architekturą informacji","authors":"W. Roman","doi":"10.12775/AKZ.2018.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Archival science, information science, records management, and information management are allied sciences. Recently, there are tendencies to merge them into information science, recognising, that despite some differences, every field copes with information. It is a big simplification of the problem, and searching for direct roots of information science in works of archives is another understatement, because this approach does not see archival science as grown from practical works of archives and having explicitly separate research object, which are archives and archival materials. Not contesting fair arguments for seeing archival science as one of information sciences, it must be stressed, that only one of its divisions – archival information resulted from arrangement and description of archival materials – is a research object shared with information science. The situation is similar with records management, that was born on the ground of studying works of offices and records circulation, from creation until their destruction or archiving permanently. Regardless of modern information and communication technologies, that substantially influenced methods of creating and passing on records, and other office works, as well as the way archives perform their functions, the specific nature of archival science and records management, that previously determined their autonomy, still remains. The cooperation with specialists of information science, with information architects is possible in accordance to practice – which is records management and archival information on the Web.","PeriodicalId":53104,"journal":{"name":"Archiwa Kancelarie Zbiory","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiwa Kancelarie Zbiory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/AKZ.2018.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Archival science, information science, records management, and information management are allied sciences. Recently, there are tendencies to merge them into information science, recognising, that despite some differences, every field copes with information. It is a big simplification of the problem, and searching for direct roots of information science in works of archives is another understatement, because this approach does not see archival science as grown from practical works of archives and having explicitly separate research object, which are archives and archival materials. Not contesting fair arguments for seeing archival science as one of information sciences, it must be stressed, that only one of its divisions – archival information resulted from arrangement and description of archival materials – is a research object shared with information science. The situation is similar with records management, that was born on the ground of studying works of offices and records circulation, from creation until their destruction or archiving permanently. Regardless of modern information and communication technologies, that substantially influenced methods of creating and passing on records, and other office works, as well as the way archives perform their functions, the specific nature of archival science and records management, that previously determined their autonomy, still remains. The cooperation with specialists of information science, with information architects is possible in accordance to practice – which is records management and archival information on the Web.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介于体系结构和信息体系结构之间
档案学、情报学、档案管理和信息管理是相关联的科学。最近,人们倾向于将它们合并到信息科学中,认识到尽管存在一些差异,但每个领域都处理信息。这是对问题的极大简化,而在档案作品中寻找情报学的直接根源又是一种轻描淡写,因为这种方法没有把档案学看作是从档案的实际工作中成长起来的,没有明确地把档案和档案资料作为单独的研究对象。我们不反对把档案学看作是情报学的一门学科,但必须强调的是,只有档案学的一个分支——档案资料的整理和描述所产生的档案信息——是与情报学共享的研究对象。这与记录管理类似,记录管理是在研究办公室和记录流通的作品的基础上诞生的,从创作到销毁或永久存档。尽管现代信息和通信技术极大地影响了档案的创建和传递方法以及其他办公室工作,也影响了档案履行职能的方式,但档案学和档案管理的特定性质,即以前决定其自主性的性质,仍然存在。与信息科学专家、信息架构师的合作在实践中是可能的——这是Web上的记录管理和档案信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hic liber in archivio conventus asservandus czyli o archiwum klasztoru św. Marcina karmelitanek bosych w Krakowie (1612-1655) V Krajowe Sympozjum Archiwalne Holenderski Podręcznik do porządkowania i opisu archiwów autorstwa S. Mullera, J. Feitha i R. Fruina z 1898 roku i jego późniejsze wydania Recenzja książki Rosie Bsheer, Archive Wars The Politics of History in Saudi Arabia, Wydawnictwo Stanford University Press, Stanford 2020, ss. 379. Pobyt w Archiwum Polskiego Muzeum w Rapperswilu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1