Effects of a 4-week pecan-enriched diet on cognitive function in healthy older adults

Q3 Medicine Nutrition and Healthy Aging Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.3233/nha-220181
Betsy Cogan, Regis C. Pearson, C. Paton, N. Jenkins, J. Cooper
{"title":"Effects of a 4-week pecan-enriched diet on cognitive function in healthy older adults","authors":"Betsy Cogan, Regis C. Pearson, C. Paton, N. Jenkins, J. Cooper","doi":"10.3233/nha-220181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Pecans are rich in nutrients known to benefit cognition. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of daily pecan consumption on cognitive function in older adults. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 42 adults (50–75y) either consumed 68 g of pecans/day for 4 weeks (pecan; n = 21) or avoided all nuts (control; n = 21). At pre- (V1) and post-intervention (V2) visits, cognitive function was assessed using a fluid composite score and four subtests from the NIH toolbox cognitive battery (NIHTB-CB) (Flanker Test, Digital Change Card Sort Test (DCCS), Picture Sequence Memory Test (PSMT), NIHTB Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)) at fasting, 30- and 210-min after a high saturated fat meal void of pecans. RESULTS: From V1 to V2, fasting and postprandial cognitive performance did not differ between groups. There were improvements in both groups for fasting fluid composite score (p <  0.001) and performance on RAVLT, PSMT, DCCS, and Flanker tests from V1 to V2 (p <  0.001 for all), with no differences between groups. Additionally, postprandial performance on RAVLT, PSMT, and Flanker tests improved at V2 (p <  0.01 for each), with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term pecan-enriched diet did not provide additional cognitive benefits in healthy older adults in the fasted or postprandial state.","PeriodicalId":37419,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Healthy Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Healthy Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/nha-220181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pecans are rich in nutrients known to benefit cognition. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of daily pecan consumption on cognitive function in older adults. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 42 adults (50–75y) either consumed 68 g of pecans/day for 4 weeks (pecan; n = 21) or avoided all nuts (control; n = 21). At pre- (V1) and post-intervention (V2) visits, cognitive function was assessed using a fluid composite score and four subtests from the NIH toolbox cognitive battery (NIHTB-CB) (Flanker Test, Digital Change Card Sort Test (DCCS), Picture Sequence Memory Test (PSMT), NIHTB Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)) at fasting, 30- and 210-min after a high saturated fat meal void of pecans. RESULTS: From V1 to V2, fasting and postprandial cognitive performance did not differ between groups. There were improvements in both groups for fasting fluid composite score (p <  0.001) and performance on RAVLT, PSMT, DCCS, and Flanker tests from V1 to V2 (p <  0.001 for all), with no differences between groups. Additionally, postprandial performance on RAVLT, PSMT, and Flanker tests improved at V2 (p <  0.01 for each), with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term pecan-enriched diet did not provide additional cognitive benefits in healthy older adults in the fasted or postprandial state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4周富含山核桃的饮食对健康老年人认知功能的影响
背景:山核桃富含有益于认知的营养物质。目的:研究每日食用山核桃对老年人认知功能的影响。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,42名成年人(50 - 75岁)连续4周每天食用68克山核桃(山核桃;N = 21)或避免所有坚果(对照组;n = 21)。在干预前(V1)和干预后(V2)访问时,在禁食、高饱和脂肪无核桃餐后30分钟和210分钟,使用液体复合评分和NIH工具箱认知电池(NIHTB- cb)中的四个子测试(Flanker测试、数字变化卡分类测试(DCCS)、图片序列记忆测试(PSMT)、NIHTB听觉语言学习测试(RAVLT))评估认知功能。结果:从V1到V2,两组之间的空腹和餐后认知表现没有差异。两组空腹液体综合评分(p < 0.001)和V1到V2的RAVLT、PSMT、DCCS和Flanker测试的表现均有改善(p < 0.001),组间无差异。此外,餐后在RAVLT、PSMT和Flanker测试中的表现在V2时有所改善(p < 0.01),组间无差异。结论:短期富含山核桃的饮食并没有为处于禁食或餐后状态的健康老年人提供额外的认知益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and Healthy Aging
Nutrition and Healthy Aging Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Nutrition and Healthy Aging is an international forum for research on nutrition as a means of promoting healthy aging. It is particularly concerned with the impact of nutritional interventions on the metabolic and molecular mechanisms which modulate aging and age-associated diseases, including both biological responses on the part of the organism itself and its micro biome. Results emanating from both model organisms and clinical trials will be considered. With regards to the latter, the journal will be rigorous in only accepting for publication well controlled, randomized human intervention trials that conform broadly with the current EFSA and US FDA guidelines for nutritional clinical studies. The journal will publish research articles, short communications, critical reviews and conference summaries, whilst open peer commentaries will be welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Skin anti-aging and wound healing effects of a passion fruit seed extract rich in piceatannol Plant protein substitution for animal protein and its association with cardiovascular risk factors and inflammatory biomarkers in elderly men: A substitution analysis Omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and their bioactive lipids: A strategy to improve resistance to respiratory tract infectious diseases in the elderly? Polymorphism of the Forkhead box-O3 (FOXO3) Longevity Gene rs2802292 and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) in Indonesian Elderly Population The association between motivation and diet quality in older runners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1