Echoic Verbs as Means of Expressing Semelfactive/Multiplicative Meanings in Contemporary English

Q2 Arts and Humanities Studies About Languages Pub Date : 2022-07-13 DOI:10.5755/j01.sal.40.1.30163
A. Tron, O. Derevianko
{"title":"Echoic Verbs as Means of Expressing Semelfactive/Multiplicative Meanings in Contemporary English","authors":"A. Tron, O. Derevianko","doi":"10.5755/j01.sal.40.1.30163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the problem of semelfactive and multiplicative verbs in contemporary English. We state that most of semelfactive/multiplicative verbs are of sound-imitating origin. On the basis of four dictionaries (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (2003), Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (2000), Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language (2008), Webster Universal College Dictionary (1997)), 285 echoic verbs were singled out. Our intention was to study the echoic verbs as the main means of expressing either semelfactive or multiplicative, or both, meanings according to the context within the framework of Smith’s (1997) theory of aspect in which five situation types, namely states, activities, achievements, accomplishments, and semelfactives are distinguished. The results of the research contribute to the study of verbal plurality in English. According to the suggested semantic classification, the analyzed verbs were subdivided into three main groups: echoic verbs denoting a sound, the source of which is a person, a thing or nature. The results of the empirically-based study are reflected in the quantitative analysis of the English echoic verbs, which concludes that verbs denoting sounds caused by a thing are used most frequently, verbs denoting sounds produced by a living being are used more seldom, and verbs denoting sounds of nature are least commonly used. Echoic verbs can also be used as part of light verb constructions, where the singular form of a deverbal noun indicates a semelfactive meaning, while the plural form expresses a multiplicative one.","PeriodicalId":37822,"journal":{"name":"Studies About Languages","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies About Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.40.1.30163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of semelfactive and multiplicative verbs in contemporary English. We state that most of semelfactive/multiplicative verbs are of sound-imitating origin. On the basis of four dictionaries (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (2003), Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (2000), Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language (2008), Webster Universal College Dictionary (1997)), 285 echoic verbs were singled out. Our intention was to study the echoic verbs as the main means of expressing either semelfactive or multiplicative, or both, meanings according to the context within the framework of Smith’s (1997) theory of aspect in which five situation types, namely states, activities, achievements, accomplishments, and semelfactives are distinguished. The results of the research contribute to the study of verbal plurality in English. According to the suggested semantic classification, the analyzed verbs were subdivided into three main groups: echoic verbs denoting a sound, the source of which is a person, a thing or nature. The results of the empirically-based study are reflected in the quantitative analysis of the English echoic verbs, which concludes that verbs denoting sounds caused by a thing are used most frequently, verbs denoting sounds produced by a living being are used more seldom, and verbs denoting sounds of nature are least commonly used. Echoic verbs can also be used as part of light verb constructions, where the singular form of a deverbal noun indicates a semelfactive meaning, while the plural form expresses a multiplicative one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代英语中回声动词作为表达半法/乘法意义的手段
本文讨论了当代英语中半析式和倍增式动词的问题。我们指出,大多数半析式/乘式动词都是模仿声音的起源。在《朗曼现代英语词典》(2003年)、《牛津现代英语高级学习词典》(2000年)、《韦伯斯特新世界美国语言词典》(2008年)、《韦伯斯特通用大学词典》(1997年)四本词典的基础上,选出了285个回声动词。我们的目的是在Smith(1997)方面理论的框架下,根据上下文研究回声动词作为表达半性或多重意义的主要手段,或者两者兼而有之。Smith(1997)方面理论区分了五种情景类型,即状态、活动、成就、成就和半性。本文的研究结果对英语语言多样性的研究具有重要意义。根据建议的语义分类,所分析的动词被细分为三大类:回声动词表示一种声音,其来源是人、物或自然。实证研究的结果体现在对英语回声动词的定量分析上,结果表明,表示事物引起的声音的动词使用频率最高,表示生物发出的声音的动词使用频率较低,表示自然声音的动词使用频率最低。回声动词也可以作为轻动词结构的一部分使用,在轻动词结构中,指示名词的单数形式表示半析义,而复数形式表示乘法义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies About Languages
Studies About Languages Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims at bringing together the scholars interested in languages and technology, linguistic theory development, empirical research of different aspects of languages functioning within a society. The articles published in the journal focus on theoretical and empirical research, including General Linguistics, Applied Linguistics (Translation studies, Computational Linguistics, Sociolinguistics, Media Linguistics, etc.), Comparative and Contrastive Linguistics. The journal aims at becoming a multidisciplinary venue of sharing ideas and experience among the scholars working in the field.
期刊最新文献
Kriegsmetaphorik in der politischen Sprache: eine kontrastive Studie am Beispiel von ukrainischen und deutschen Pressetexten Modal polyfunctionality and German modals revisited Lessons learned from an electronic botany dictionary compilation project Variation diatopique dans la terminologie juridique. Analyse des néologismes juridiques dans FranceTerme, dans le Grand dictionnaire terminologique, dans TERMIUM Plus® et TERMDAT Preferences of Lithuanian cybersecurity synonymous terms in different user groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1