Does CSR Reduce Idiosyncratic Risk? Roles of Operational Efficiency and AI Innovation

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Production and Operations Management Pub Date : 2020-03-21 DOI:10.1111/POMS.13483
Guo Li, Na Li, S. Sethi
{"title":"Does CSR Reduce Idiosyncratic Risk? Roles of Operational Efficiency and AI Innovation","authors":"Guo Li, Na Li, S. Sethi","doi":"10.1111/POMS.13483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is playing an increasingly important role in firm risk management in Industry 4.0. To mitigate risk and improve operational productivity, Artificial Intelligence (AI), one of key disruptive technologies, has been widely employed in many industries. In this study, we examine the relationship among CSR, Idiosyncratic Risk (IR), Operational Efficiency (OE), and AI innovation in different ownership structures. The empirical analysis results show that CSR and OE can negatively influences firm IR. However, beyond some level, increasing CSR may increase IR indicating a U-shaped relationship. Regardless, OE strengthens CSR’s reduction effect on IR and weakens its increasing effect. Meanwhile, AI innovation inhibits the U-shaped relationship between CSR and IR. Interestingly, we find that the influencing mechanisms vary among firms with different ownership structures. The U-shaped relationship between CSR and IR only exists in private and state-owned enterprises. In central-owned enterprises, it is only negative. This indicates that too much CSR may hurt private and state-owned enterprises, but it will not hurt central-owned enterprises in relation to IR. OE decreases IR for private enterprises, while it does not affect the IR of state-owned or central-owned enterprises significantly. We find surprisingly that AI innovation increases IR of private enterprises, while it decreases that of state-owned enterprises. The moderating effects of OE and AI innovation do not work for state-owned or central-owned enterprises. Finally, we discuss the managerial and practical implications of these findings.","PeriodicalId":20623,"journal":{"name":"Production and Operations Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/POMS.13483","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/POMS.13483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is playing an increasingly important role in firm risk management in Industry 4.0. To mitigate risk and improve operational productivity, Artificial Intelligence (AI), one of key disruptive technologies, has been widely employed in many industries. In this study, we examine the relationship among CSR, Idiosyncratic Risk (IR), Operational Efficiency (OE), and AI innovation in different ownership structures. The empirical analysis results show that CSR and OE can negatively influences firm IR. However, beyond some level, increasing CSR may increase IR indicating a U-shaped relationship. Regardless, OE strengthens CSR’s reduction effect on IR and weakens its increasing effect. Meanwhile, AI innovation inhibits the U-shaped relationship between CSR and IR. Interestingly, we find that the influencing mechanisms vary among firms with different ownership structures. The U-shaped relationship between CSR and IR only exists in private and state-owned enterprises. In central-owned enterprises, it is only negative. This indicates that too much CSR may hurt private and state-owned enterprises, but it will not hurt central-owned enterprises in relation to IR. OE decreases IR for private enterprises, while it does not affect the IR of state-owned or central-owned enterprises significantly. We find surprisingly that AI innovation increases IR of private enterprises, while it decreases that of state-owned enterprises. The moderating effects of OE and AI innovation do not work for state-owned or central-owned enterprises. Finally, we discuss the managerial and practical implications of these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业社会责任能降低特殊风险吗?运营效率和人工智能创新的作用
在工业4.0时代,企业社会责任(CSR)在企业风险管理中扮演着越来越重要的角色。为了降低风险和提高运营效率,人工智能(AI)作为关键的颠覆性技术之一,已被广泛应用于许多行业。在本研究中,我们考察了不同股权结构下企业社会责任、特质风险(IR)、运营效率(OE)和人工智能创新之间的关系。实证分析结果表明,企业社会责任和OE对企业IR有负向影响。然而,在一定程度上,CSR的增加可能会增加IR,呈u型关系。OE增强了CSR对IR的降低作用,减弱了CSR对IR的增加作用。同时,人工智能创新抑制了企业社会责任与企业责任之间的u型关系。有趣的是,我们发现不同股权结构的企业影响机制存在差异。企业社会责任与企业社会责任之间的u型关系仅存在于民营企业和国有企业。在中央企业中,只有负面影响。这表明过多的企业社会责任可能会对民营企业和国有企业造成伤害,但不会对中央企业造成损害。OE降低了民营企业的IR,而对国有和央企的IR影响不显著。我们惊奇地发现,人工智能创新提高了民营企业的IR,而降低了国有企业的IR。OE和人工智能创新的调节效应对国有企业和中央企业不起作用。最后,我们讨论了这些发现的管理和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Production and Operations Management
Production and Operations Management 管理科学-工程:制造
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
278
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Production and Operations Management is to serve as the flagship research journal in operations management in manufacturing and services. The journal publishes scientific research into the problems, interest, and concerns of managers who manage product and process design, operations, and supply chains. It covers all topics in product and process design, operations, and supply chain management and welcomes papers using any research paradigm.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Execution Failures in Retail Supply Chains – A Virtual Reality Experiment EXPRESS: Can Social Technologies Drive Purchases in E-Commerce Live Streaming? an Empirical Study of Broadcasters' Cognitive and Affective Social Call-To-Actions EXPRESS: Framing Inclusive Practice Options for Financial, Operational, and Community Outcomes EXPRESS: Impact of Capacity Strain on the Health Status of Patients Discharged from an ICU EXPRESS: E-tailer’s Inventory Location and Pricing with Strategic Consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1