Abdominal wall endometriosis: Is structure in imaging related to nodule localisation? A retrospective study

IF 0.6 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders Pub Date : 2021-05-12 DOI:10.1177/22840265211009643
Claire Figuier, P. Montoriol, B. Pereira, P. Chauvet, N. Bourdel, M. Canis
{"title":"Abdominal wall endometriosis: Is structure in imaging related to nodule localisation? A retrospective study","authors":"Claire Figuier, P. Montoriol, B. Pereira, P. Chauvet, N. Bourdel, M. Canis","doi":"10.1177/22840265211009643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Investigate the relationship between the structure of abdominal wall endometriotic nodules in MRI and their localisation in abdominal wall layers in order to better understand nodule origins. Design: Women who had an MRI prior to surgical treatment of an abdominal wall endometriotic nodule between 2005 and 2016. Population: Thirty-six patients including four patients with two nodules. Methods: MRI images were reviewed. Each nodule was analysed according to its structure (fibrous, cystic, mixed), localisation (subcutaneous fat, intra muscular, intermediary position), and size. Results: Forty nodules were analysed in MRI with no relationship found between localisation and nodule structure (p = 0.48). 87.5% of mixed nodules were revealed to have a cystic superficial rim extending towards the subcutaneous fat layer. This finding suggests that the glandular part of the nodule is the active part of the disease from which nodule progression occurs. Intermediary and intramuscular nodules were respectively statistically larger than subcutaneous fat nodules indicating a relationship between nodule size and localisation (35 mm (22–53) vs 17 mm (17–23)) (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Despite differences in environments surrounding the nodules, no significant relationship between nodule structure in imaging and abdominal wall localisation was found. Data from mixed nodules indicate however the possible role of nodule environment on structure and that the mechanism of nodule growth may be linked to development of cystic superficial rims, at the forefront of disease progression, abdominal wall nodules growing from deep to superficial. Studies are required to further investigate our findings and enable greater understanding of the origins of AWE.","PeriodicalId":15725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"205 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/22840265211009643","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22840265211009643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Investigate the relationship between the structure of abdominal wall endometriotic nodules in MRI and their localisation in abdominal wall layers in order to better understand nodule origins. Design: Women who had an MRI prior to surgical treatment of an abdominal wall endometriotic nodule between 2005 and 2016. Population: Thirty-six patients including four patients with two nodules. Methods: MRI images were reviewed. Each nodule was analysed according to its structure (fibrous, cystic, mixed), localisation (subcutaneous fat, intra muscular, intermediary position), and size. Results: Forty nodules were analysed in MRI with no relationship found between localisation and nodule structure (p = 0.48). 87.5% of mixed nodules were revealed to have a cystic superficial rim extending towards the subcutaneous fat layer. This finding suggests that the glandular part of the nodule is the active part of the disease from which nodule progression occurs. Intermediary and intramuscular nodules were respectively statistically larger than subcutaneous fat nodules indicating a relationship between nodule size and localisation (35 mm (22–53) vs 17 mm (17–23)) (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Despite differences in environments surrounding the nodules, no significant relationship between nodule structure in imaging and abdominal wall localisation was found. Data from mixed nodules indicate however the possible role of nodule environment on structure and that the mechanism of nodule growth may be linked to development of cystic superficial rims, at the forefront of disease progression, abdominal wall nodules growing from deep to superficial. Studies are required to further investigate our findings and enable greater understanding of the origins of AWE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹壁子宫内膜异位症:影像学结构与结节定位有关吗?回顾性研究
目的:探讨腹壁子宫内膜异位结节的MRI结构与腹壁层定位的关系,以便更好地了解结节的起源。设计:2005年至2016年间,在腹壁子宫内膜异位结节手术治疗前接受MRI检查的女性。人群:36例,其中4例伴2个结节。方法:回顾MRI影像。每个结节根据其结构(纤维性、囊性、混合性)、定位(皮下脂肪、肌肉内、中间位置)和大小进行分析。结果:MRI分析40例结节,定位与结节结构无相关性(p = 0.48)。87.5%的混合性结节表现为囊性浅缘向皮下脂肪层延伸。这一发现提示,结节的腺体部分是疾病的活跃部分,结节从这里开始进展。中间结节和肌肉内结节分别大于皮下脂肪结节,这表明结节大小与定位有关(35 mm (22-53) vs 17 mm (17 - 23)) (p = 0.03)。结论:尽管结节周围环境不同,但影像学上结节结构与腹壁定位无明显关系。然而,来自混合结节的数据表明,结节环境对结构的可能作用以及结节生长的机制可能与囊性浅缘的发展有关,在疾病进展的最前沿,腹壁结节从深部向浅表生长。需要进一步研究我们的发现,并更好地了解AWE的起源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Endometriosis on TikTok: Evaluating social media misinformation and the role of healthcare professionals When cystoscopy catches what laparoscopy misses: The role of cystoscopy in evaluation of bladder endometriosis Comprehensive management of umbilical endometriosis using a unique laparoscopic entry portal (Darwish point) and postoperative Dienogest Chronic pelvic pain: An underrecognised perioperative consideration The Holy Grail of endometriosis biomarkers in the diagnostic process – How much would it be worth and what does it look like?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1