Acceptance of Post-Partum Family Planning among Mothers Attending for Child Immunisation Services at Tertiary Care Hospital, Kolkata

M. Datta, Arista Lahiri
{"title":"Acceptance of Post-Partum Family Planning among Mothers Attending for Child Immunisation Services at Tertiary Care Hospital, Kolkata","authors":"M. Datta, Arista Lahiri","doi":"10.51957/healthline_252_2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:Postpartum family planning (PPFP) is avoidance of closely spaced and unplanned pregnancies by use of family planning services within first year following delivery.World Health Organisation (WHO) reports postpartum women to have greatest unmet need of contraception. There is further recommendation to link immunisation clinics to PPFP services.Objectives:1. To assess the acceptance rate ofPPFPamong mothers attending immunisation clinic 2. To explore the determinants of usage, intention to use and PPFP methods used. 3. To find the reasons for non-acceptance ofPPFP among the study participants. Method:Study participants werewomen attendingimmunisation clinicof a tertiary level teaching hospital of Kolkatafor child’s immunisation service. Studydesign was cross sectional.Systematic random sampling technique was used to recruit participants. Data was collected by interviewer administered semi-structured questionnaire.Frequencies and percentages for categorical variables while mean and standard deviation for continuous variables were calculated. Crude Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was calculated to explore strength of association between PPFP acceptance and independent variables.Results:About 1 in every 3 women (37.36%) was PPFP acceptor; intra uterine device was the most commonly used method. Odds of acceptance was lower for respondents’ age <25 years and primipara whileit was higher for exposure to counselling, having male child, resumption of sex and past use of contraception. Fear of adverse effects was the most common reason for non-acceptance of PPFP.Conclusions: PPFP acceptance was low, however among acceptors long acting reversible contraceptives were more commonly accepted methods. There is scope to improve PPFP acceptance with intensified contraceptive counselling during delivery and immediate hospital stay as women were afraid of adverse effects of contraceptives.","PeriodicalId":33836,"journal":{"name":"Healthline","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthline","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51957/healthline_252_2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:Postpartum family planning (PPFP) is avoidance of closely spaced and unplanned pregnancies by use of family planning services within first year following delivery.World Health Organisation (WHO) reports postpartum women to have greatest unmet need of contraception. There is further recommendation to link immunisation clinics to PPFP services.Objectives:1. To assess the acceptance rate ofPPFPamong mothers attending immunisation clinic 2. To explore the determinants of usage, intention to use and PPFP methods used. 3. To find the reasons for non-acceptance ofPPFP among the study participants. Method:Study participants werewomen attendingimmunisation clinicof a tertiary level teaching hospital of Kolkatafor child’s immunisation service. Studydesign was cross sectional.Systematic random sampling technique was used to recruit participants. Data was collected by interviewer administered semi-structured questionnaire.Frequencies and percentages for categorical variables while mean and standard deviation for continuous variables were calculated. Crude Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was calculated to explore strength of association between PPFP acceptance and independent variables.Results:About 1 in every 3 women (37.36%) was PPFP acceptor; intra uterine device was the most commonly used method. Odds of acceptance was lower for respondents’ age <25 years and primipara whileit was higher for exposure to counselling, having male child, resumption of sex and past use of contraception. Fear of adverse effects was the most common reason for non-acceptance of PPFP.Conclusions: PPFP acceptance was low, however among acceptors long acting reversible contraceptives were more commonly accepted methods. There is scope to improve PPFP acceptance with intensified contraceptive counselling during delivery and immediate hospital stay as women were afraid of adverse effects of contraceptives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在加尔各答三级保健医院接受儿童免疫服务的母亲接受产后计划生育
引言:产后计划生育(PPFP)是通过在分娩后第一年内使用计划生育服务来避免间隔很近和计划外怀孕。世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)报告称,产后妇女的避孕需求未得到满足。进一步建议将免疫诊所与PPFP服务联系起来。目的:1.评估亲妈到免疫门诊就诊的接受率。探讨使用、使用意向和PPFP方法的决定因素。3.找出研究参与者不接受PFP的原因。方法:研究参与者是在加尔各答一家三级教学医院的社区诊所接受儿童免疫服务的女性。Studydesign为横截面。采用系统随机抽样技术招募参与者。数据通过访谈者管理的半结构化问卷收集。计算分类变量的频率和百分比,同时计算连续变量的平均值和标准差。计算95%置信区间的粗比值比,以探索PPFP接受度和自变量之间的关联强度。结果:每3名女性中就有1名(37.36%)是PPFP受体;宫内节育器是最常用的方法。年龄<25岁的受访者接受的几率较低,初产妇接受咨询、生男孩、恢复性生活和过去避孕的几率较高。对不良反应的恐惧是不接受PPFP的最常见原因。结论:PPFP接受率较低,但在接受者中,长效可逆避孕药是更常见的接受方法。由于妇女害怕避孕药具的不良影响,在分娩期间加强避孕咨询并立即住院,可以提高PPFP的接受率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment and Correlation of Physical Activity and Mental Health Status of Medical Students at One of the Medical Colleges of Karnataka, India Should Every Medical College have a Dedicated Vaccination Clinic? Strain and Burden among Caregivers of Stroke Survivors in Punjab: A Cross-Sectional Study Tobacco Cessation Centres: Vital Cog in the Fight against Tobacco Epidemic Preparedness towards a future pandemic Caffeine – An Enigma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1