CASTING THE LIGHT OF THE THEORY OF OPPOSITION ONTO HOHFELD'S FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL CONCEPTS

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW Legal Theory Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1017/S1352325221000070
João Alberto de Oliveira Lima, Cristine Griffo, J. P. Almeida, G. Guizzardi, M. Aranha
{"title":"CASTING THE LIGHT OF THE THEORY OF OPPOSITION ONTO HOHFELD'S FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL CONCEPTS","authors":"João Alberto de Oliveira Lima, Cristine Griffo, J. P. Almeida, G. Guizzardi, M. Aranha","doi":"10.1017/S1352325221000070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract At the core of Hohfeld's contribution to legal theory is a conceptual framework for the analysis of the legal positions occupied by agents in intersubjective legal relations. Hohfeld presented a system of eight “fundamental” concepts relying on notions of opposition and correlation. Throughout the years, a number of authors have followed Hohfeld in applying the notion of opposition to analyze legal concepts. Many of these authors have accounted for Hohfeld's theory in direct analogy with the standard deontic hexagon. This paper reviews some of these accounts and extends them employing recent developments from opposition theory. In particular, we are able to extend application of opposition theory to an open conception of the law. We also account for the implications of abandoning the assumption of conflict-freedom and admitting seemingly conflicting legal positions. This enables a fuller analysis of Hohfeld's conceptual analytical framework. We also offer a novel analysis of Hohfeld's power positions.","PeriodicalId":44287,"journal":{"name":"Legal Theory","volume":"27 1","pages":"2 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1352325221000070","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325221000070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract At the core of Hohfeld's contribution to legal theory is a conceptual framework for the analysis of the legal positions occupied by agents in intersubjective legal relations. Hohfeld presented a system of eight “fundamental” concepts relying on notions of opposition and correlation. Throughout the years, a number of authors have followed Hohfeld in applying the notion of opposition to analyze legal concepts. Many of these authors have accounted for Hohfeld's theory in direct analogy with the standard deontic hexagon. This paper reviews some of these accounts and extends them employing recent developments from opposition theory. In particular, we are able to extend application of opposition theory to an open conception of the law. We also account for the implications of abandoning the assumption of conflict-freedom and admitting seemingly conflicting legal positions. This enables a fuller analysis of Hohfeld's conceptual analytical framework. We also offer a novel analysis of Hohfeld's power positions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论反对论对霍菲尔德基本法律概念的启示
Hohfeld对法律理论贡献的核心是一个概念框架,用于分析主体间法律关系中代理人所占据的法律地位。Hohfeld以对立和关联的概念为基础,提出了一个由八个“基本”概念组成的体系。多年来,许多作者追随Hohfeld运用对立的概念来分析法律概念。这些作者中的许多人都把Hohfeld的理论直接类比为标准的道义六边形。本文回顾了其中的一些说法,并利用对立理论的最新发展对其进行了扩展。特别是,我们能够将对立理论的应用扩展到一个开放的法律概念。我们还解释了放弃冲突自由假设和承认看似相互冲突的法律立场的影响。这样就可以对Hohfeld的概念分析框架进行更全面的分析。我们还对Hohfeld的权力地位进行了新颖的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Administration as Democratic Trustee Representation Proportionality, Comparability, and Parity: A Discussion on the Rationality of Balancing Neglecting Others and Making It Up to Them: The Idea of a Corrective Duty The Promise and Limits of Grounding in Law The Exclusionary Power of Political Directives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1