Daniel Altshuler and Robert Truswell, Coordination and the Syntax-Discourse Interface (Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Morphology 11). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. xii + 315.

IF 0.8 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI:10.1017/S0022226723000038
R. Chaves
{"title":"Daniel Altshuler and Robert Truswell, Coordination and the Syntax-Discourse Interface (Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Morphology 11). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. xii + 315.","authors":"R. Chaves","doi":"10.1017/S0022226723000038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last half century, much research has focused on the nature of coordination, particularly on its extraction patterns, collectively dubbed as the Coordinate Structure Constraint (CSC) by Ross (1967). The first part of the CSC, known as the Conjunct Constraint, bans the extraction of conjuncts (*Who did you see Robin and _?), and the second part, known as the Element Constraint, blocks extraction from conjuncts (*Who did you see Robin and a picture of _?). The latter is circumvented when extraction is Across-the-Board (Who did you buy a picture of _and a book about _?) or when the the order of conjuncts has certain asymmetrical interpretations, such as narration (e.g. Here’s the whiskey which I went to the store and bought _) or violated expectation (e.g. How much can you drink_and still stay sober]?). Prior research on the CSC focuses on the syntax or semantic-pragmatic components, not on their interaction. The strength of this monograph is precisely the attention that both domains earn. The conclusion (276) is that neither syntax nor discourse is exclusively responsible for explaining the observable extraction patterns; rather, both are needed to fully understand how coordination interacts with the grammar of extraction. This book offers a deep examination of the role that discourse restrictions play in explaining how extraction works in coordination, covering an extraordinary amount of data. Apart from minor issues discussed below, it is well-argued. Chapter 2 surveys definitions of the object of study and coordination, and it concludes that they defy a cross-linguistic characterization, as there are no necessary and sufficient morphosyntactic properties in the languages of the world. Another challenge for a definition of coordination that the authors mention is ‘nonconstituent’ coordination phenomena, such as Right-Node Raising (RNR) andGapping, but the problemwith this claim is that these phenomena are not strictly related to coordination:","PeriodicalId":47027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Linguistics","volume":"59 1","pages":"691 - 695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226723000038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last half century, much research has focused on the nature of coordination, particularly on its extraction patterns, collectively dubbed as the Coordinate Structure Constraint (CSC) by Ross (1967). The first part of the CSC, known as the Conjunct Constraint, bans the extraction of conjuncts (*Who did you see Robin and _?), and the second part, known as the Element Constraint, blocks extraction from conjuncts (*Who did you see Robin and a picture of _?). The latter is circumvented when extraction is Across-the-Board (Who did you buy a picture of _and a book about _?) or when the the order of conjuncts has certain asymmetrical interpretations, such as narration (e.g. Here’s the whiskey which I went to the store and bought _) or violated expectation (e.g. How much can you drink_and still stay sober]?). Prior research on the CSC focuses on the syntax or semantic-pragmatic components, not on their interaction. The strength of this monograph is precisely the attention that both domains earn. The conclusion (276) is that neither syntax nor discourse is exclusively responsible for explaining the observable extraction patterns; rather, both are needed to fully understand how coordination interacts with the grammar of extraction. This book offers a deep examination of the role that discourse restrictions play in explaining how extraction works in coordination, covering an extraordinary amount of data. Apart from minor issues discussed below, it is well-argued. Chapter 2 surveys definitions of the object of study and coordination, and it concludes that they defy a cross-linguistic characterization, as there are no necessary and sufficient morphosyntactic properties in the languages of the world. Another challenge for a definition of coordination that the authors mention is ‘nonconstituent’ coordination phenomena, such as Right-Node Raising (RNR) andGapping, but the problemwith this claim is that these phenomena are not strictly related to coordination:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Daniel Altshuler和Robert Truswell,协调与句法话语界面(牛津语法与形态学调查11)。牛津:牛津大学出版社,2022年。第xii+315页。
在过去的半个世纪里,许多研究都集中在协调的性质上,特别是其提取模式上,Ross(1967)将其统称为协调结构约束(CSC)。CSC的第一部分,被称为连词约束,禁止提取连词(*你看到了Robin和_?),而第二部分被称为元素约束,阻止从连词中提取(*你见过Robin和一张_的照片?)。当提取是全面的(你买了谁的照片和一本关于_的书。先前对CSC的研究主要集中在句法或语义语用成分上,而不是它们之间的相互作用。这本专著的优势正是这两个领域所获得的关注。结论(276)是,语法和语篇都不专门负责解释可观察到的提取模式;相反,两者都需要充分理解协调是如何与提取语法相互作用的。这本书深入探讨了话语限制在解释提取如何协同工作中所起的作用,涵盖了大量数据。除了下面讨论的一些小问题外,这是有充分理由的。第二章考察了研究对象和协调对象的定义,得出的结论是,它们违背了跨语言的特征,因为世界语言中没有必要和充分的形态句法特性。作者提到的对协调定义的另一个挑战是“非结构性”协调现象,如右节点抬高(RNR)和间隙,但这一说法的问题是,这些现象与协调并不严格相关:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Linguistics (JL) has as its goal to publish articles that make a clear contribution to current debate in all branches of theoretical linguistics. The journal also provides an excellent survey of recent linguistics publications, with around thirty book reviews in each volume and regular review articles on major works marking important theoretical advances. View a FREE collection of JL papers, highlighting the Journal"s broad coverage
期刊最新文献
Non-agreeing degree constructions Separability of dependents from VP in English: Beyond the argument/adjunct distinction Mutation, allomorphy and Galician clitics Chinese copy raising and its implications for predication Theme-vowel minimal pairs show argument structure alternations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1