Exploring racialization as technology for oppression in Stephanie Saulter’s Gemsigns (2013)

Q2 Arts and Humanities European Journal of American Culture Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1386/ejac_00078_1
Alena Cicholewski
{"title":"Exploring racialization as technology for oppression in Stephanie Saulter’s Gemsigns (2013)","authors":"Alena Cicholewski","doi":"10.1386/ejac_00078_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Stephanie Saulter’s 2013 debut novel Gemsigns, a pandemic known as ‘the Syndrome’ has wiped out most of humanity. To cope with the sudden loss of most of their work force, bioengineering companies have modified human genes to create genetically altered workers, the so-called gems. For more than a hundred years, gems have been the property of the company that created them, but as the gems have become more and more advanced in their cognitive skills, calls for their emancipation arose, until gem enslavement is eventually abolished. This article reads Gemsigns as a warning against how bioengineering can be employed to reaffirm racialized hierarchies with racialization working as a technology for oppression. The enslavement of gems does not merely replace older forms of economic exploitation of oppressed groups but is firmly rooted in real-world power structures, thereby addressing the exceptional vulnerability of marginalized people to be commodified by technological progress instead of profiting from it. I further suggest that Gemsigns uses its post-abolition setting to illustrate that the struggles for equality of formerly enslaved people do not simply end with the official abolishment of enslavement.","PeriodicalId":35235,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of American Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of American Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/ejac_00078_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Stephanie Saulter’s 2013 debut novel Gemsigns, a pandemic known as ‘the Syndrome’ has wiped out most of humanity. To cope with the sudden loss of most of their work force, bioengineering companies have modified human genes to create genetically altered workers, the so-called gems. For more than a hundred years, gems have been the property of the company that created them, but as the gems have become more and more advanced in their cognitive skills, calls for their emancipation arose, until gem enslavement is eventually abolished. This article reads Gemsigns as a warning against how bioengineering can be employed to reaffirm racialized hierarchies with racialization working as a technology for oppression. The enslavement of gems does not merely replace older forms of economic exploitation of oppressed groups but is firmly rooted in real-world power structures, thereby addressing the exceptional vulnerability of marginalized people to be commodified by technological progress instead of profiting from it. I further suggest that Gemsigns uses its post-abolition setting to illustrate that the struggles for equality of formerly enslaved people do not simply end with the official abolishment of enslavement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在斯蒂芬妮·索尔特的《Gemsigns》(2013)中探索种族化作为压迫的技术
在斯蒂芬妮·索尔特2013年的处女作《宝石》中,一种被称为“综合症”的流行病已经消灭了大部分人类。为了应对大部分劳动力的突然流失,生物工程公司对人类基因进行了改造,创造出了转基因工人,即所谓的宝石。一百多年来,宝石一直是制造宝石的公司的财产,但随着宝石的认知技能越来越先进,人们开始呼吁解放宝石,直到宝石奴役最终被废除。这篇文章将Gemsigns解读为对如何利用生物工程来重申种族化等级制度的警告,种族化是一种压迫技术。对宝石的奴役不仅取代了对受压迫群体的旧形式的经济剥削,而且深深植根于现实世界的权力结构,从而解决了边缘化人群因技术进步而非从中获利的特殊脆弱性。我进一步建议,Gemsigns利用其废除后的背景来说明,以前被奴役的人争取平等的斗争并不是简单地以正式废除奴役而结束的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of American Culture
European Journal of American Culture Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Editors’ Introduction ‘What did we prove?’: William Wyler’s The Big Country (1958) and the revisionism of Westerns Sisyphus on horseback: Landscape allegory in the postwar Western Mechanisms of time in video game Westerns from Gun Fight to Red Dead Redemption 2 Between ‘Ich will Spaß’ and ‘99 Jahre Krieg’: Receptions of the ‘New German Wave’ in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1