The voice of reason: a thematic appraisal of editorial coverage of Nigeria’s 2015 elections

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1080/02533952.2022.2146263
Ogemdi Uchenna Eze
{"title":"The voice of reason: a thematic appraisal of editorial coverage of Nigeria’s 2015 elections","authors":"Ogemdi Uchenna Eze","doi":"10.1080/02533952.2022.2146263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study is an analysis of four Nigerian newspaper editorials’ (the Guardian, Vanguard, Independent and Leadership) coverage of the 2015 general elections in Nigeria. Peace and solution journalism perspectives provided the theoretical insights through which the examination is made. This qualitative study, located within an interpretivist tradition, identified 101 election-related editorials for the study. Using a purposive sampling technique, 25 editorials that were illustrative of the three themes: violence-free polls, rational voting, and credible electoral process, which emerged from reading and re-reading of the editorials, were selected for analysis. The research showed that the editorials sought to a. redirect the attention of the electorate caught up in the personalisation of issues by politicians towards key issues affecting the nation, to guide their electoral decisions, b. appeal to political actors to stem the spate of violence in the polity and c. advocate for a credible electoral process to produce leadership that would be truly reflective of the wishes and aspirations of the people. The editorials made moral and ethical appeals urging “supra-national” and patriotic attitudes as well as more detailed process interventions. This study highlights the role of editorials in peacebuilding efforts at such times as elections.","PeriodicalId":51765,"journal":{"name":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"533 - 549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2022.2146263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study is an analysis of four Nigerian newspaper editorials’ (the Guardian, Vanguard, Independent and Leadership) coverage of the 2015 general elections in Nigeria. Peace and solution journalism perspectives provided the theoretical insights through which the examination is made. This qualitative study, located within an interpretivist tradition, identified 101 election-related editorials for the study. Using a purposive sampling technique, 25 editorials that were illustrative of the three themes: violence-free polls, rational voting, and credible electoral process, which emerged from reading and re-reading of the editorials, were selected for analysis. The research showed that the editorials sought to a. redirect the attention of the electorate caught up in the personalisation of issues by politicians towards key issues affecting the nation, to guide their electoral decisions, b. appeal to political actors to stem the spate of violence in the polity and c. advocate for a credible electoral process to produce leadership that would be truly reflective of the wishes and aspirations of the people. The editorials made moral and ethical appeals urging “supra-national” and patriotic attitudes as well as more detailed process interventions. This study highlights the role of editorials in peacebuilding efforts at such times as elections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理性之声:对尼日利亚2015年选举编辑报道的主题评价
本研究分析了尼日利亚四家报纸的社论(《卫报》、《先锋报》、《独立报》和《领导报》)对2015年尼日利亚大选的报道。和平与解决方案新闻的观点提供了理论见解,通过这一审查进行。这项定性研究,定位于解释主义传统,为研究确定了101篇与选举有关的社论。使用有目的的抽样技术,选取25篇社论进行分析,这些社论说明了三个主题:无暴力民意调查、理性投票和可信的选举过程,这些主题是通过阅读和重读社论而产生的。研究表明,这些社论试图a.将选民的注意力转移到政治家对影响国家的关键问题的个性化问题上,以指导他们的选举决策,b.呼吁政治行为者阻止政治中的暴力事件,c.倡导可信的选举过程,以产生真正反映人民愿望和愿望的领导层。社论提出了道德和伦理呼吁,敦促“超国家”和爱国态度,以及更详细的过程干预。这项研究强调了社论在选举等时期建设和平努力中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Social Dynamics is the journal of the Centre for African Studies at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. It has been published since 1975, and is committed to advancing interdisciplinary academic research, fostering debate and addressing current issues pertaining to the African continent. Articles cover the full range of humanities and social sciences including anthropology, archaeology, economics, education, history, literary and language studies, music, politics, psychology and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Ke mosali oa Mosotho : reflecting on indigenous conceptions of womanhood in Lesotho Strategic protest and the negotiation of legibility in Cape Town: a case study of Reclaim the City Rituals, family connections, and BoRakgadi Intellectual decolonisation and the danger of epistemic closure: the need for a critical decolonial theory Why recognition? Deciphering justice claims in 2016 Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1