Decentralized Common Knowledge Oracles

IF 0.6 Q4 ECONOMICS Ledger Pub Date : 2019-12-03 DOI:10.5195/ledger.2019.166
Austin K. Williams, Jack Peterson
{"title":"Decentralized Common Knowledge Oracles","authors":"Austin K. Williams, Jack Peterson","doi":"10.5195/ledger.2019.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We define and analyze three mechanisms for getting common knowledge, a posteriori truths about the world, onto a blockchain in a decentralized setting. We show that, when a reasonable economic condition is met, these mechanisms are individually rational, incentive compatible, and decide the true outcome of valid oracle queries in both the non-cooperative and cooperative settings. These mechanisms are based upon repeated games with two classes of players: queriers who desire to get common knowledge truths onto the blockchain and a pool of reporters who posses such common knowledge. Presented with a new oracle query, reporters have an opportunity to report the truth in return for a fee provided by the querier. During subsequent oracle queries, the querier has an opportunity to punish any reporters who did not report truthfully during previous rounds. While the set of reporters has the power to cause the oracle to lie, they are incentivized not to do so.","PeriodicalId":36240,"journal":{"name":"Ledger","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ledger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2019.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We define and analyze three mechanisms for getting common knowledge, a posteriori truths about the world, onto a blockchain in a decentralized setting. We show that, when a reasonable economic condition is met, these mechanisms are individually rational, incentive compatible, and decide the true outcome of valid oracle queries in both the non-cooperative and cooperative settings. These mechanisms are based upon repeated games with two classes of players: queriers who desire to get common knowledge truths onto the blockchain and a pool of reporters who posses such common knowledge. Presented with a new oracle query, reporters have an opportunity to report the truth in return for a fee provided by the querier. During subsequent oracle queries, the querier has an opportunity to punish any reporters who did not report truthfully during previous rounds. While the set of reporters has the power to cause the oracle to lie, they are incentivized not to do so.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去中心化的常识预言机
我们定义并分析了三种机制,用于在去中心化的环境中获得关于世界的后验真理的常识。我们证明,当一个合理的经济条件得到满足时,这些机制是单独理性的,激励相容的,并决定了在非合作和合作设置下有效oracle查询的真实结果。这些机制是基于两类玩家的重复游戏:一类是希望将常识真相发布到b区块链上的查询者,另一类是拥有这些常识的记者。提供一个新的oracle查询,记者有机会报道真相,以换取由查询者提供的费用。在随后的oracle查询中,查询者有机会惩罚在前几轮中没有如实报告的任何记者。虽然这群记者有能力让先知撒谎,但他们被激励着不这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ledger
Ledger Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tokenized Carbon Credits Irrational Economic Action: Running a Bitcoin Lightning Node for Negative Profit Blockchains and Triple-Entry Accounting for B2B Business Models A Token Economics Explanation for the De-Pegging of the Algorithmic Stablecoin: Analysis of the Case of Terra Economics of Open-Source Solar Photovoltaic Powered Cryptocurrency Mining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1