Effect of Different Resin Cements on Shear Bond Strength between Acrylic Denture Teeth and Resin Composite

Jirat Srihatajati, Pattarawadee Krassanairawiwong
{"title":"Effect of Different Resin Cements on Shear Bond Strength between Acrylic Denture Teeth and Resin Composite","authors":"Jirat Srihatajati, Pattarawadee Krassanairawiwong","doi":"10.12982/cmujns.2022.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different bonding agents and resin cements on shear bond strength (SBS) between acrylic resin teeth and resin composite. Thirty acrylic teeth were cut along the long axis and embedded in cold-cure acrylic resin. The specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the types of luting agents: Group C (OptiBond FL), Group P (Panavia F2.0), and Group S (Superbond C&B). SBS was measured using the Shimadzu EZ-S Universal Testing Machine. The collected data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA to determine significant differences with P-value < 0.05. Multiple comparisons of SBS were calculated using the Tukey HSD test at a 95% confidence level. The average SBS values in MPa were 5.78 ± 0.97 for Group C, 13.60 ± 1.20 for Group P, and 17.93 ± 1.24 for Group S. The SBS value for Group S was significantly higher compared to the other groups, while the value for Group C was significantly lower. Group C was categorized as an adhesive failure, while Group S was accounted as a cohesive failure and Group P was shown to be a mixed failure. In conclusion, different resin cements significantly affected the SBS between acrylic resin teeth and resin composite. Keywords: Acrylic denture tooth, Bonding agent, Resin cement, Resin composite, Shear bond strength","PeriodicalId":10049,"journal":{"name":"Chiang Mai University journal of natural sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiang Mai University journal of natural sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/cmujns.2022.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different bonding agents and resin cements on shear bond strength (SBS) between acrylic resin teeth and resin composite. Thirty acrylic teeth were cut along the long axis and embedded in cold-cure acrylic resin. The specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the types of luting agents: Group C (OptiBond FL), Group P (Panavia F2.0), and Group S (Superbond C&B). SBS was measured using the Shimadzu EZ-S Universal Testing Machine. The collected data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA to determine significant differences with P-value < 0.05. Multiple comparisons of SBS were calculated using the Tukey HSD test at a 95% confidence level. The average SBS values in MPa were 5.78 ± 0.97 for Group C, 13.60 ± 1.20 for Group P, and 17.93 ± 1.24 for Group S. The SBS value for Group S was significantly higher compared to the other groups, while the value for Group C was significantly lower. Group C was categorized as an adhesive failure, while Group S was accounted as a cohesive failure and Group P was shown to be a mixed failure. In conclusion, different resin cements significantly affected the SBS between acrylic resin teeth and resin composite. Keywords: Acrylic denture tooth, Bonding agent, Resin cement, Resin composite, Shear bond strength
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同树脂胶结物对丙烯酸义齿与树脂复合材料剪切粘结强度的影响
摘要本研究旨在评价不同粘结剂和树脂胶结剂对丙烯酸树脂牙与树脂复合材料间剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。沿长轴切割30颗丙烯酸牙,嵌入冷固化丙烯酸树脂中。按灭虫剂种类随机分为3组(n = 10): C组(OptiBond FL)、P组(Panavia F2.0)、S组(Superbond C&B)。SBS采用岛津EZ-S型万能试验机进行测量。收集的资料采用单因素方差分析,p值< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。SBS的多重比较采用Tukey HSD检验,置信水平为95%。平均SBS MPa值C组为5.78±0.97,P组为13.60±1.20,S组为17.93±1.24,S组的SBS值显著高于其他组,C组的SBS值显著低于其他组。C组被归类为粘接失败,而S组被认为是粘接失败,P组被认为是混合失败。综上所述,不同树脂胶结物对丙烯酸树脂牙与树脂复合牙之间的SBS有显著影响。关键词:丙烯酸义齿,粘结剂,树脂水泥,树脂复合材料,剪切强度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chiang Mai University journal of natural sciences
Chiang Mai University journal of natural sciences Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
Systematic Review-Meta Analysis Study the Effect of Cadmium and Copper Exposure on Children’s Cognitive Sinapyl alcohols analogues from the stembark of Zanthoxylum rhetsa (Roxb.) DC and their cytotoxic activity against MCF-7 breast cancer cell line The Capacity of Heavy Metal Remediation by Cyperus alternifolius, Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty, and Aloe vera (L.) Burm.f. under Industrial and Urban Wastewater Treatment Correlation between Skin Prick Test and Specific IgE of Local Mites Allergen in Atopic Dermatitis Patients: an Indonesian Study Response Surface Methodology for Simple Non-Acid Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction of Pectin from Taiwan’s Citrus depressa H. Peels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1