The levels of cognitive flexibility and cognitive resilience and their relationships with academic performance in college students during Covid 19 pandemic.

Muath A. Alammar, D. Ram, Khudhayr Nasser Albarragi, A. S. Alshahrani
{"title":"The levels of cognitive flexibility and cognitive resilience and their relationships with academic performance in college students during Covid 19 pandemic.","authors":"Muath A. Alammar, D. Ram, Khudhayr Nasser Albarragi, A. S. Alshahrani","doi":"10.2174/2666082218666220629092457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nCognitive flexibility and resilience may influence academic achievement. These cognitive functions may be affected during the Covid 19 pandemic. Few studies have been conducted to examine these relationships.\n\n\n\nThis study examined college students' cognitive flexibility and resilience and their relationships with academic achievement during the Covid 19 pandemic.\n\n\n\nIn this cross-sectional study, 303 students were assessed using sociodemographic and academic proforma, the Cognitive Flexibility Scale, and the Cognitive Resilience Scale. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, contingency table analysis, the Kruskal–Wallis H test, the Mann–Whitney U test, and linear regression analysis (with moderation).\n\n\n\nCognitive flexibility was significantly greater in those who were success-oriented, had a backlog, and studied a health science subject, whereas resilience was greater in those who had lower course competency and had encountered psychological issues. Exam scores were positively linked with students' economic status and negatively linked with students' perceptions of course competency. Cognitive resilience predicted exam performance positively, which was moderated by cognitive flexibility.\n\n\n\nCognitive resilience positively affects academic performance and is moderated by cognitive flexibility.\n","PeriodicalId":36711,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2666082218666220629092457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility and resilience may influence academic achievement. These cognitive functions may be affected during the Covid 19 pandemic. Few studies have been conducted to examine these relationships. This study examined college students' cognitive flexibility and resilience and their relationships with academic achievement during the Covid 19 pandemic. In this cross-sectional study, 303 students were assessed using sociodemographic and academic proforma, the Cognitive Flexibility Scale, and the Cognitive Resilience Scale. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, contingency table analysis, the Kruskal–Wallis H test, the Mann–Whitney U test, and linear regression analysis (with moderation). Cognitive flexibility was significantly greater in those who were success-oriented, had a backlog, and studied a health science subject, whereas resilience was greater in those who had lower course competency and had encountered psychological issues. Exam scores were positively linked with students' economic status and negatively linked with students' perceptions of course competency. Cognitive resilience predicted exam performance positively, which was moderated by cognitive flexibility. Cognitive resilience positively affects academic performance and is moderated by cognitive flexibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间大学生认知灵活性和认知弹性水平及其与学业成绩的关系
认知灵活性和弹性可能影响学业成绩。这些认知功能可能在新冠肺炎疫情期间受到影响。很少有研究来检验这些关系。这项研究调查了新冠肺炎疫情期间大学生的认知灵活性和韧性,以及他们与学业成绩的关系。在这项横断面研究中,303名学生使用社会人口学和学术形式表、认知灵活性量表和认知弹性量表进行了评估。使用描述性统计、列联表分析、Kruskal–Wallis H检验、Mann–Whitney U检验和线性回归分析(适度)对数据进行分析。那些以成功为导向、有积压工作和研究健康科学主题的人的认知灵活性显著更大,而那些课程能力较低并遇到心理问题的人的适应力更强。考试成绩与学生的经济状况呈正相关,与学生对课程能力的认知呈负相关。认知弹性对考试成绩有正向预测作用,并受到认知灵活性的调节。认知弹性对学习成绩有正向影响,并受到认知灵活性的调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of Bibliotherapy in Depression Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials Psychosis and Neurosis: Main Differences and Impact on Life The Social Media Mirror: Understanding the Distortion of Eating Habits and Body Image in the Digital Age The Experience of Parents When they Find Out that their Child has Autism: A Phenomenological Study Revolutionizing Psychiatric Care: Unleashing the Potential of Augmented and Virtual Reality for Diagnosis and Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1