Legal Dialectics: Age Limits for Marriage and Political Rights in Indonesia

Sarip Sarip, Dian Fitriana, Aip Syarifudin, A. Romdoni, Multahibun Multahibun
{"title":"Legal Dialectics: Age Limits for Marriage and Political Rights in Indonesia","authors":"Sarip Sarip, Dian Fitriana, Aip Syarifudin, A. Romdoni, Multahibun Multahibun","doi":"10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a19018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : This study aimed to examine the legal dialectic over the age limit for marriage and political rights in Indonesia. It was promoted by a new marriage regulation stipulating the minimum age of nineteen years for men and women. This regulation correlates with the rules containing the minimum age limit, necessitating a further discussion. Objective: Previous studies on the minimum age limit did not focus on the law dialectic. Methodology: There are contradictions between the normative method of law and the idea of legal dialectics. The conclusions were drawn inductively. Findings: There are inequalities in several laws and regulations over the minimum age. The legal products, including a minimum age, are specific to certain laws and actions. The marriage dispensation has broken through higher laws, significantly impacting political rights. Therefore, positive law that ideally becomes a thesis turns into an antithesis due to the dispensation. The minimum marriage age of nineteen years for men and women is a synthesis and a new thesis, while those under eighteen are considered children (Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection). This is the impact of feminism development in Indonesia (Mustika, 2016). In politics, the minimum limit aims to select seventeen years or those married (Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections). Differences in the minimum limit, marriage, children, and different political rights place age as a thesis. Additionally, marriage, children, and political rights are a synthesis. The exceptions to the marriage dispensation create automatic maturity for those non-compliant with the adult requirements set by Indonesian law, except in criminal cases. The marriage dispensation places those married as workers with equal rights and obligations as adults, as stipulated in the labor law. In administrative law, people could apply for citizenship because they are considered mature by the marriage dispensation. This is similar to Law No. 7 of 2017, where a marriage dispensation allows people to become adults beyond the age limit regulated in the election laws. law rules.","PeriodicalId":32116,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a19018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction : This study aimed to examine the legal dialectic over the age limit for marriage and political rights in Indonesia. It was promoted by a new marriage regulation stipulating the minimum age of nineteen years for men and women. This regulation correlates with the rules containing the minimum age limit, necessitating a further discussion. Objective: Previous studies on the minimum age limit did not focus on the law dialectic. Methodology: There are contradictions between the normative method of law and the idea of legal dialectics. The conclusions were drawn inductively. Findings: There are inequalities in several laws and regulations over the minimum age. The legal products, including a minimum age, are specific to certain laws and actions. The marriage dispensation has broken through higher laws, significantly impacting political rights. Therefore, positive law that ideally becomes a thesis turns into an antithesis due to the dispensation. The minimum marriage age of nineteen years for men and women is a synthesis and a new thesis, while those under eighteen are considered children (Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection). This is the impact of feminism development in Indonesia (Mustika, 2016). In politics, the minimum limit aims to select seventeen years or those married (Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections). Differences in the minimum limit, marriage, children, and different political rights place age as a thesis. Additionally, marriage, children, and political rights are a synthesis. The exceptions to the marriage dispensation create automatic maturity for those non-compliant with the adult requirements set by Indonesian law, except in criminal cases. The marriage dispensation places those married as workers with equal rights and obligations as adults, as stipulated in the labor law. In administrative law, people could apply for citizenship because they are considered mature by the marriage dispensation. This is similar to Law No. 7 of 2017, where a marriage dispensation allows people to become adults beyond the age limit regulated in the election laws. law rules.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律辩证法:印尼婚姻的年龄限制与政治权利
引言:本研究旨在探讨印尼在婚姻和政治权利年龄限制方面的法律辩证法。一项新的婚姻法规定男女的最低年龄为19岁。这一规定与包含最低年龄限制的规定相关联,需要进一步讨论。目的:以往关于最低年龄限制的研究,缺乏对法律辩证法的关注。方法论:法律的规范性方法与法律辩证法思想之间存在矛盾。结论是归纳得出的。研究发现:若干法律法规对最低年龄的规定存在不平等。法定产品,包括最低年龄,是特定于某些法律和行为的。婚姻制度突破了上级法律,对政治权利产生了重大影响。因此,理想上成为正题的实在法由于这种分流而变成了对题。男女最低结婚年龄19岁是一个综合和新的命题,而18岁以下的人被视为儿童(2014年第35号法,关于修订2002年第23号法,关于儿童保护)。这是印度尼西亚女权主义发展的影响(Mustika, 2016)。在政治上,最低限度是选择17岁或已婚人士(议会选举相关法律2017年第7号)。差别在最低限度、婚姻、子女、不同政治权利等方面以年龄为论题。此外,婚姻、孩子和政治权利是一个综合体。婚姻豁免的例外情况使那些不符合印度尼西亚法律规定的成人要求的人自动成熟,但刑事案件除外。婚姻法规定,作为劳动者结婚的人享有与成年人同等的权利和义务。在行政法上,人们可以申请公民身份,因为他们被认为是成熟的婚姻制度。这与2017年第7号《选举法》类似,该法律规定,在选举法规定的年龄之外,婚姻豁免可以成为成年人。法律规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implications of Utilizing Protected Forest Areas for Geothermal Business: A Legal Analysis Local Examination in Child Custody Disputes: Judges’ Efforts to Find the Best Interests of the Child Understanding the Place of Islamic Arbitration within the Nigerian Law Legal Protection of HARA Platform Users on the Service of Electronic Data Interchange Legal Protection Policy for Obstetricians-Gynecologists in Cases of Maternal, Perinatal, and Neonatal Mortality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1