PM10 emission from feedlots in soils with different texture: Cattle trampling effect

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Aeolian Research Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100742
Laura A. de Oro , Fernando Avecilla , Juan E. Panebianco , Daniel E. Buschiazzo
{"title":"PM10 emission from feedlots in soils with different texture: Cattle trampling effect","authors":"Laura A. de Oro ,&nbsp;Fernando Avecilla ,&nbsp;Juan E. Panebianco ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Buschiazzo","doi":"10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Cattle feedlot surfaces can be an important aerosol source, but they have barely been studied. The action of the hooves on the loose, dry layer of soil and manure creates ideal conditions for particulate matter (PM) emissions. The objectives of this work were: a) to quantify the soil loss (Q) and the consequent emission of PM</span><sub>10</sub> (FvPM<sub>10</sub>) from different surfaces within the feedlot: unpaved roads (UR), cropland (C) and cattle pen (CP); and b) to evaluate the cattle trampling effect in UR, C and CP on Q and FvPM<sub>10</sub><span>. The study was carried out in three feedlots with different soil textures: Trenel (F</span><sub>T</sub>), Santa Rosa (F<sub>SR</sub>) and General Acha (F<sub>GA</sub><span>). In a wind tunnel, erosion events were simulated at 10.5 m s</span><sup>−1</sup> (µ<sub>*</sub>: 0.26 m s<sup>−1</sup>) during 5 min. The results showed that Q and FvPM<sub>10</sub> were UR &gt; C &gt; CP and that the cattle trampling effect was generally directly proportional to Q and FvPM<sub>10</sub> (p &lt; 0.05). In general the emission efficiency (calculated as FvPM<sub>10</sub>/Q) was higher in the feedlot with the finest soil texture (F<sub>T</sub>) than in the other two feedlots with coarser soil (F<sub>SR</sub> and F<sub>GA</sub>). Regarding the type of surface, emission efficiency from UR was lower than from C and CP surfaces. CP presented the lowest values of Q and FvPM<sub>10</sub>, but it showed high RE so it could be considered a continuous source of wind derived emission of PM<sub>10</sub> due to the effect of permanent trampling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49246,"journal":{"name":"Aeolian Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100742","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aeolian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875963721000793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Cattle feedlot surfaces can be an important aerosol source, but they have barely been studied. The action of the hooves on the loose, dry layer of soil and manure creates ideal conditions for particulate matter (PM) emissions. The objectives of this work were: a) to quantify the soil loss (Q) and the consequent emission of PM10 (FvPM10) from different surfaces within the feedlot: unpaved roads (UR), cropland (C) and cattle pen (CP); and b) to evaluate the cattle trampling effect in UR, C and CP on Q and FvPM10. The study was carried out in three feedlots with different soil textures: Trenel (FT), Santa Rosa (FSR) and General Acha (FGA). In a wind tunnel, erosion events were simulated at 10.5 m s−1*: 0.26 m s−1) during 5 min. The results showed that Q and FvPM10 were UR > C > CP and that the cattle trampling effect was generally directly proportional to Q and FvPM10 (p < 0.05). In general the emission efficiency (calculated as FvPM10/Q) was higher in the feedlot with the finest soil texture (FT) than in the other two feedlots with coarser soil (FSR and FGA). Regarding the type of surface, emission efficiency from UR was lower than from C and CP surfaces. CP presented the lowest values of Q and FvPM10, but it showed high RE so it could be considered a continuous source of wind derived emission of PM10 due to the effect of permanent trampling.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同质地土壤饲养场的PM10排放:牛践踏效应
牛饲养场的表面可能是一个重要的气溶胶源,但它们几乎没有被研究过。蹄在松散、干燥的土壤和粪肥层上的运动为颗粒物(PM)的排放创造了理想的条件。这项工作的目的是:a)量化饲养场内不同表面的土壤流失(Q)和PM10的排放(FvPM10):未铺筑的道路(UR),农田(C)和牛圈(CP);b)评价UR、C和CP对Q和FvPM10的践踏效应。研究在3个不同土壤质地的饲养场进行:特内尔(Trenel)、圣罗莎(Santa Rosa)和阿查将军(General Acha)。在风洞中,以10.5 m s - 1(µ*:0.26 m s - 1)的速度模拟5 min内的侵蚀事件。结果表明,Q和FvPM10分别为UR >C比;踩牛效应一般与Q和FvPM10成正比(p <0.05)。总体而言,土壤质地较好的饲养场(FT)的发射效率(以FvPM10/Q计算)高于土壤质地较粗的饲养场(FSR和FGA)。就表面类型而言,UR表面的发射效率低于C和CP表面。CP的Q值和FvPM10值最低,但RE值较高,由于长期践踏的影响,可以认为CP是PM10的连续风源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aeolian Research
Aeolian Research GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Aeolian Research includes the following topics: • Fundamental Aeolian processes, including sand and dust entrainment, transport and deposition of sediment • Modeling and field studies of Aeolian processes • Instrumentation/measurement in the field and lab • Practical applications including environmental impacts and erosion control • Aeolian landforms, geomorphology and paleoenvironments • Dust-atmosphere/cloud interactions.
期刊最新文献
Aeolian sand cover on a granite peninsula (Hammeren, Bornholm, Baltic Sea) formed in three episodes during the past 11,600 years Speculation on an early Pleistocene origin of the Parker dunes of southwest Arizona, USA Transport and deposition of microplastics and microrubbers during a dust storm (Sarakhs, northeast Iran) Automatic identification of saltating tracks driven by strong wind in high-speed video using multiple statistical quantities of instant particle velocity Characterizing variability in geochemistry and mineralogy of western US dust sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1