The effect of COVID-19 vaccinations on self-reported depression and anxiety during February 2021

IF 1.5 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS Statistics and Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI:10.1080/2330443x.2023.2190008
M. Rubinstein, A. Haviland, J. Breslau
{"title":"The effect of COVID-19 vaccinations on self-reported depression and anxiety during February 2021","authors":"M. Rubinstein, A. Haviland, J. Breslau","doi":"10.1080/2330443x.2023.2190008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the COVID-19 Trends and Impacts Survey (CTIS), we examine the effect of COVID-19 vaccinations on (self-reported) feelings of depression and anxiety (\"depression\"), isolation, and worries about health, among vaccine-accepting survey respondents during February 2021. Assuming no unmeasured confounding, we estimate that vaccinations caused a -4.3 (-4.7, -3.8), -3.4 (-3.9, -2.9), and -4.8 (-5.4, -4.1) percentage point change in these outcomes, respectively. We further argue that these effects provide a lower bound on the mental health burden of the pandemic, implying that the COVID-19 pandemic was responsible for at least a 28.6 (25.3, 31.9) percent increase in feelings of depression and a 20.5 (17.3, 23.6) percent increase in feelings of isolation during February 2021 among vaccine-accepting CTIS survey respondents. We also posit a model where vaccinations affect depression through worries about health and feelings of isolation, and estimate the proportion mediated by each pathway. We find that feelings of social isolation is the stronger mediator, accounting for 41.0 (37.3, 44.7) percent of the total effect, while worries about health accounts for 9.4 (7.6, 11.1) percent of the total effect. We caution that the causal interpretation of these findings rests on strong assumptions. Nevertheless, as the pandemic continues, policymakers should also target interventions aimed at managing the substantial mental health burden associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":43397,"journal":{"name":"Statistics and Public Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443x.2023.2190008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Using the COVID-19 Trends and Impacts Survey (CTIS), we examine the effect of COVID-19 vaccinations on (self-reported) feelings of depression and anxiety ("depression"), isolation, and worries about health, among vaccine-accepting survey respondents during February 2021. Assuming no unmeasured confounding, we estimate that vaccinations caused a -4.3 (-4.7, -3.8), -3.4 (-3.9, -2.9), and -4.8 (-5.4, -4.1) percentage point change in these outcomes, respectively. We further argue that these effects provide a lower bound on the mental health burden of the pandemic, implying that the COVID-19 pandemic was responsible for at least a 28.6 (25.3, 31.9) percent increase in feelings of depression and a 20.5 (17.3, 23.6) percent increase in feelings of isolation during February 2021 among vaccine-accepting CTIS survey respondents. We also posit a model where vaccinations affect depression through worries about health and feelings of isolation, and estimate the proportion mediated by each pathway. We find that feelings of social isolation is the stronger mediator, accounting for 41.0 (37.3, 44.7) percent of the total effect, while worries about health accounts for 9.4 (7.6, 11.1) percent of the total effect. We caution that the causal interpretation of these findings rests on strong assumptions. Nevertheless, as the pandemic continues, policymakers should also target interventions aimed at managing the substantial mental health burden associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021年2月新冠肺炎疫苗接种对自我报告的抑郁和焦虑的影响
利用新冠肺炎趋势和影响调查(CTIS),我们研究了2021年2月接受疫苗接种的调查对象中新冠肺炎疫苗接种对(自我报告的)抑郁和焦虑(“抑郁”)、隔离和对健康的担忧的影响。假设没有未测量的混杂因素,我们估计疫苗接种分别导致这些结果发生-4.3(-4.7,-3.8)、-3.4(-3.9,-2.9)和-4.8(-5.4,-4.1)个百分点的变化。我们进一步认为,这些影响为大流行的心理健康负担提供了一个下限,这意味着新冠肺炎大流行导致了2021年2月接受疫苗接种的CTIS调查对象中至少28.6%(25.3,31.9)的抑郁感增加和20.5%(17.3,23.6)的孤独感增加。我们还假设了一个模型,在该模型中,疫苗接种通过对健康的担忧和孤独感影响抑郁症,并估计了每种途径介导的比例。我们发现,社会孤立感是更强的中介,占总效应的41.0(37.3,44.7)%,而对健康的担忧占总影响的9.4(7.611.1)%。我们警告说,对这些发现的因果解释建立在强有力的假设之上。尽管如此,随着疫情的持续,政策制定者还应针对旨在管理与新冠肺炎疫情相关的巨大心理健康负担的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics and Public Policy
Statistics and Public Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
13
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
State-Building through Public Land Disposal? An Application of Matrix Completion for Counterfactual Prediction Clusters of Jail Incarcerations in US Counties: 2010-2018 Comment on ‘What protects the autonomy of the Federal Statistics Agencies? An Assessment of the Procedures in Place That Protect the Independence and Objectivity of Official Statistics” by Pierson et al. On Coping in a Non-Binary World: Rejoinder to Biedermann and Kotsoglou Commentary on “Three-Way ROCs for Forensic Decision Making” by Nicholas Scurich and Richard S. John (in: Statistics and Public Policy)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1