Alzheimer's Disease Plasma Biomarkers Distinguish Clinical Diagnostic Groups in Memory Clinic Patients.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-03 DOI:10.1159/000524390
Michelle Gerards, Ann-Katrin Schild, Dix Meiberth, Ayda Rostamzadeh, Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Sebastian Wingen-Heimann, Wibke Johannis, Pamela Martino Adami, Oezguer A Onur, Alfredo Ramirez, Thomas K Karikari, Nicholas J Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Franziska Maier, Frank Jessen
{"title":"Alzheimer's Disease Plasma Biomarkers Distinguish Clinical Diagnostic Groups in Memory Clinic Patients.","authors":"Michelle Gerards, Ann-Katrin Schild, Dix Meiberth, Ayda Rostamzadeh, Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Sebastian Wingen-Heimann, Wibke Johannis, Pamela Martino Adami, Oezguer A Onur, Alfredo Ramirez, Thomas K Karikari, Nicholas J Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Franziska Maier, Frank Jessen","doi":"10.1159/000524390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several recent research studies show high performance of blood biomarkers to identify Alzheimer's disease also in the pre-dementia mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage, but data from the routine clinical care memory clinic setting are needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined plasma samples of 144 memory clinic patients, including dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT, n = 54), MCI (n = 57), and subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n = 33), who either presented as self-referrals or were referred by general practitioners or neurologists or psychiatrists. The plasma biomarkers, amyloid-beta42 (Aß42), amyloid-beta40 (Aß40), phospho-Tau181 (pTau181), total-tau (tTau), and neurofilament light (NFL), as well as different ratios, were measured using the ultrasensitive single molecule array (Simoa) immunoassay technology. Statistical analysis including Kruskal-Wallis test, linear regression, and receiver operating characteristics analyses was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the single markers, we observed statistically significant group effects of pTau181 (H(2) = 34.43, p < 0.001) and NFL (H(2) = 27.66, p < 0.001). All individual group comparisons of pTau181 were significant, while the contrast of SCD versus MCI for NFL was not significant. In addition, the ratios of Aß42/Aß40 (H(2) = 7.50, p = 0.02) and pTau181/Aß42 (H(2) = 25.26, p < 0.001) showed significant group effects with significant difference between all groups for pTau181/Aß42 and an SCD versus MCI difference for Aß42/Aß40. PTau181 showed the highest area under the curve of 0.85 for the discrimination of SCD and DAT with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 79% at a cut-off of 12.2 pg/mL. Age influenced Aß42, Aß40, and NFL concentrations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasma pTau181 and NFL, as well as the ratios Aß42/Aß40 and pTau181/Aß42, are biomarkers, which can differentiate diagnostic groups in a memory clinic setting outside of research studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":"51 1","pages":"182-192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000524390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several recent research studies show high performance of blood biomarkers to identify Alzheimer's disease also in the pre-dementia mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage, but data from the routine clinical care memory clinic setting are needed.

Methods: We examined plasma samples of 144 memory clinic patients, including dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT, n = 54), MCI (n = 57), and subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n = 33), who either presented as self-referrals or were referred by general practitioners or neurologists or psychiatrists. The plasma biomarkers, amyloid-beta42 (Aß42), amyloid-beta40 (Aß40), phospho-Tau181 (pTau181), total-tau (tTau), and neurofilament light (NFL), as well as different ratios, were measured using the ultrasensitive single molecule array (Simoa) immunoassay technology. Statistical analysis including Kruskal-Wallis test, linear regression, and receiver operating characteristics analyses was performed.

Results: Of the single markers, we observed statistically significant group effects of pTau181 (H(2) = 34.43, p < 0.001) and NFL (H(2) = 27.66, p < 0.001). All individual group comparisons of pTau181 were significant, while the contrast of SCD versus MCI for NFL was not significant. In addition, the ratios of Aß42/Aß40 (H(2) = 7.50, p = 0.02) and pTau181/Aß42 (H(2) = 25.26, p < 0.001) showed significant group effects with significant difference between all groups for pTau181/Aß42 and an SCD versus MCI difference for Aß42/Aß40. PTau181 showed the highest area under the curve of 0.85 for the discrimination of SCD and DAT with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 79% at a cut-off of 12.2 pg/mL. Age influenced Aß42, Aß40, and NFL concentrations.

Conclusion: Plasma pTau181 and NFL, as well as the ratios Aß42/Aß40 and pTau181/Aß42, are biomarkers, which can differentiate diagnostic groups in a memory clinic setting outside of research studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默病血浆生物标志物区分记忆临床患者的临床诊断组
最近的几项研究表明,血液生物标志物在痴呆症前轻度认知障碍(MCI)阶段也能很好地识别阿尔茨海默病,但还需要常规临床护理记忆临床设置的数据。方法:我们检测了144例记忆临床患者的血浆样本,包括阿尔茨海默型痴呆(DAT, n = 54)、轻度认知障碍(MCI, n = 57)和主观认知衰退(SCD, n = 33),这些患者要么是自我转诊,要么是由全科医生、神经科医生或精神科医生转诊。采用超灵敏单分子阵列(Simoa)免疫测定技术,测定血浆生物标志物淀粉样蛋白- β - 42 (Aß42)、淀粉样蛋白- β - 40 (Aß40)、磷酸化-tau 181 (pTau181)、总tau (tTau)、神经丝光(NFL)及不同比例。统计分析包括Kruskal-Wallis检验、线性回归和受试者工作特征分析。结果:在单标志物中,pTau181 (H(2) = 34.43, p < 0.001)和NFL (H(2) = 27.66, p < 0.001)的组效应均有统计学意义。pTau181的所有个体组比较均具有显著性,而SCD与MCI对NFL的比较无显著性。此外,Aß42/Aß40比值(H(2) = 7.50, p = 0.02)和pTau181/Aß42比值(H(2) = 25.26, p < 0.001)组间效应显著,各组间差异显著,且Aß42/Aß40的SCD与MCI差异显著。PTau181对SCD和DAT的鉴别曲线下面积最高,为0.85,灵敏度为80%,特异性为79%,截止值为12.2 pg/mL。年龄影响Aß42、Aß40和NFL浓度。结论:血浆pTau181和NFL以及a ß42/ a ß40和pTau181/ a ß42比值是临床记忆诊断组的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
期刊最新文献
Sleep apnea risk, subjective cognitive decline, and cognitive performance: Findings from the Boston Latino Aging Study (BLAST). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves motor symptoms, sleep, and cognitive dysfunctions in Parkinson's disease. THE ASSOCIATION OF IMPAIRED VIBRATION SENSATION IN THE LOWER LIMB WITH TESTS OF COGNITION IN OLDER PEOPLE The Cardiovascular Health Study. Effectiveness of the Music Therapy in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Feasibility and psychometric properties of Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool for Taiwanese (ICOPES-TW) cognitive screening test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1