The Blackfish Effect: Corporate and Policy Change in the Face of Shifting Public Opinion on Captive Cetaceans

Q3 Social Sciences Tourism in Marine Environments Pub Date : 2018-08-16 DOI:10.3727/154427318X15225564602926
E. Parsons, N. Rose
{"title":"The Blackfish Effect: Corporate and Policy Change in the Face of Shifting Public Opinion on Captive Cetaceans","authors":"E. Parsons, N. Rose","doi":"10.3727/154427318X15225564602926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In February 2010, a captive killer whale (Orcinus orca), or orca, killed his trainer at SeaWorld Florida. A cascade of events followed, including successful federal enforcement action against SeaWorld for employee safety violations. In 2012 and 2015, nonfiction books about SeaWorld's\n history with orcas were published; however, the 2013 documentary Blackfish has done the most to raise public awareness of captive orca welfare and trainer safety. It spawned a massive social media response, leading to the so-called \"Blackfish Effect.\" SeaWorld's visitor numbers\n declined, business partners ended their relationships, and stock price plummeted. In 2012, Georgia Aquarium in Atlanta applied for a permit to import 18 wild-caught beluga whales from Russia; the permit was denied in 2013, the first time a public display permit had ever been denied in the\n history of the US Marine Mammal Protection Act. In 2014 and 2016, the California legislature considered bills phasing out captive orca exhibits in the state; the 2016 bill passed and became law in January 2017. In November 2015, a similar bill was introduced (and reintroduced in March 2017)\n in the US House of Representatives. In March 2016 SeaWorld announced it would end its orca breeding program company-wide and in January 2018 the Vancouver Aquarium announced it would no longer display cetaceans. Shifts in public perception of captive cetacean display strongly suggest policy\n makers should reconsider the legislative and regulatory status quo.","PeriodicalId":35146,"journal":{"name":"Tourism in Marine Environments","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3727/154427318X15225564602926","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism in Marine Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/154427318X15225564602926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

In February 2010, a captive killer whale (Orcinus orca), or orca, killed his trainer at SeaWorld Florida. A cascade of events followed, including successful federal enforcement action against SeaWorld for employee safety violations. In 2012 and 2015, nonfiction books about SeaWorld's history with orcas were published; however, the 2013 documentary Blackfish has done the most to raise public awareness of captive orca welfare and trainer safety. It spawned a massive social media response, leading to the so-called "Blackfish Effect." SeaWorld's visitor numbers declined, business partners ended their relationships, and stock price plummeted. In 2012, Georgia Aquarium in Atlanta applied for a permit to import 18 wild-caught beluga whales from Russia; the permit was denied in 2013, the first time a public display permit had ever been denied in the history of the US Marine Mammal Protection Act. In 2014 and 2016, the California legislature considered bills phasing out captive orca exhibits in the state; the 2016 bill passed and became law in January 2017. In November 2015, a similar bill was introduced (and reintroduced in March 2017) in the US House of Representatives. In March 2016 SeaWorld announced it would end its orca breeding program company-wide and in January 2018 the Vancouver Aquarium announced it would no longer display cetaceans. Shifts in public perception of captive cetacean display strongly suggest policy makers should reconsider the legislative and regulatory status quo.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑鱼效应:面对公众对圈养鲸类的舆论转变,企业和政策发生了变化
2010年2月,在佛罗里达海洋世界,一头圈养的虎鲸(Orcinus orca)杀死了它的驯兽师。随后发生了一系列事件,包括联邦执法部门成功地对海洋世界违反员工安全的行为采取了行动。2012年和2015年,出版了关于海洋世界与逆戟鲸的历史的非小说类书籍;然而,2013年的纪录片《黑鱼》在提高公众对圈养逆戟鲸福利和驯兽师安全的认识方面做得最多。它在社交媒体上引发了大规模的反应,导致了所谓的“黑鱼效应”。海洋世界的游客数量下降,商业伙伴结束了合作关系,股价暴跌。2012年,亚特兰大的乔治亚水族馆申请了从俄罗斯进口18头野生白鲸的许可证;该许可证于2013年被拒绝,这是美国海洋哺乳动物保护法历史上首次拒绝公开展示许可证。2014年和2016年,加州立法机构考虑了逐步取消该州圈养虎鲸展览的法案;2016年的法案于2017年1月通过并成为法律。2015年11月,美国众议院提出了一项类似的法案(并于2017年3月重新提出)。2016年3月,海洋世界宣布将结束公司范围内的逆戟鲸繁殖计划,2018年1月,温哥华水族馆宣布将不再展示鲸类动物。公众对圈养鲸类动物展示的看法发生了转变,这强烈表明政策制定者应该重新考虑立法和监管现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tourism in Marine Environments
Tourism in Marine Environments Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Tourism in Marine Environments is an interdisciplinary journal dealing with a variety of management issues in marine settings. It is a scientific journal that draws upon the expertise of academics and practitioners from various disciplines related to the marine environment, including tourism, marine science, geography, social sciences, psychology, environmental studies, economics, marketing, and many more.
期刊最新文献
Book Review - Islands and resilience experiences from the pandemic era The Future of Scuba Diving Tourism: Assessmentsof Perceived Value and Satisfactionon the Mississippi Gulf Coast Does thepsychological well-beingof maleand femaletourism-reliantworkers differ during a crisis such as COVID-19?A case of Fiji Shark diving tourism experiences: Perspectives from professionals and tourists to improve management THE BLUE FLAG AWARD IN SOUTH AFRICA: RAISING CONSCIENCES AND INFLUENCING BEACH GOERS' DECISIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1