Thoracic interfacial plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block for anesthesia in gynecomastia surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Taysser M. Abdelraheem, T. Naguib, A. Elkeblawy
{"title":"Thoracic interfacial plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block for anesthesia in gynecomastia surgery: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Taysser M. Abdelraheem, T. Naguib, A. Elkeblawy","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_271_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gynecomastia is a benign proliferative condition affecting the glandular tissue of the male breast. This study compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided thoracic interfacial plane block (TIPB) with ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in providing anesthesia for gynecomastia surgery. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized open label clinical trial included 90 patients scheduled for elective surgery for idiopathic gynecomastia. Patients were randomly allocated into three equal groups: group C (control group) received bilateral tumescent local anesthesia, group TPVB received bilateral ultrasound guided TPVB, and group TIPB received bilateral ultrasound guided TIPB. We evaluated postoperative analgesic requirements, pain score, and patient’s satisfaction. Results: Intraoperative fentanyl requirement and total diclofenac in the first 24 hours postoperative were significantly lower in both TPVB and TIPB groups compared to control group (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). Patient satisfaction was significantly better (P = 0.004) in both TPVB and TIPB groups when compared to control group. In postoperative evaluation, we found both TPVB and TIPB produced significantly lower pain score compared to control group in 2-hours (P < 0.001) and 4-hours (P = 0.001) after the surgery. Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation were comparable in all groups, as well as the occurrence of complications. Conclusion: Either TIPB and TPVB may provide effective analgesic property for anesthesia in gynecomastia surgery. This is shown by lower intraoperative analgesic requirements, lower postoperative pain score, and better patient’s satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"7 1","pages":"32 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_271_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gynecomastia is a benign proliferative condition affecting the glandular tissue of the male breast. This study compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided thoracic interfacial plane block (TIPB) with ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in providing anesthesia for gynecomastia surgery. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized open label clinical trial included 90 patients scheduled for elective surgery for idiopathic gynecomastia. Patients were randomly allocated into three equal groups: group C (control group) received bilateral tumescent local anesthesia, group TPVB received bilateral ultrasound guided TPVB, and group TIPB received bilateral ultrasound guided TIPB. We evaluated postoperative analgesic requirements, pain score, and patient’s satisfaction. Results: Intraoperative fentanyl requirement and total diclofenac in the first 24 hours postoperative were significantly lower in both TPVB and TIPB groups compared to control group (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). Patient satisfaction was significantly better (P = 0.004) in both TPVB and TIPB groups when compared to control group. In postoperative evaluation, we found both TPVB and TIPB produced significantly lower pain score compared to control group in 2-hours (P < 0.001) and 4-hours (P = 0.001) after the surgery. Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation were comparable in all groups, as well as the occurrence of complications. Conclusion: Either TIPB and TPVB may provide effective analgesic property for anesthesia in gynecomastia surgery. This is shown by lower intraoperative analgesic requirements, lower postoperative pain score, and better patient’s satisfaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸部界面平面阻滞与胸旁阻滞用于女性乳房发育术麻醉的随机对照试验
背景:女性乳腺癌是一种影响男性乳腺腺体组织的良性增生性疾病。本研究比较了超声引导下胸廓界面平面阻滞(TIPB)和超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)在为女性乳房发育症手术提供麻醉方面的疗效。材料和方法:这项前瞻性随机开放标签临床试验包括90名计划接受特发性女性乳房发育症选择性手术的患者。患者被随机分为三组:C组(对照组)接受双侧肿胀局部麻醉,TPVB组接受双侧超声引导的TPVB,TIPB组接受双侧超声波引导的TIPB。我们评估了术后镇痛需求、疼痛评分和患者满意度。结果:与对照组相比,TPVB组和TIPB组术中芬太尼需求量和术后前24小时的双氯芬酸总量均显著降低(分别为P=0.002和P<0.001)。与对照组相比,TPVB和TIPB组的患者满意度显著提高(P=0.004)。在术后评估中,我们发现与对照组相比,TPVB和TIPB在术后2小时(P<0.001)和4小时(P=0.001)的疼痛评分均显著降低。各组的平均动脉血压、心率和外周血氧饱和度以及并发症的发生率具有可比性。结论:TIPB和TPVB均可为女性乳房发育术的麻醉提供有效的镇痛效果。这表现为术中镇痛要求较低,术后疼痛评分较低,患者满意度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Selective Critically ill patients with tracheostomy are eligible for direct from intensive care unit sent home: Case series Comment on: Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and monocyte lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study Low procalcitonin clearance correlates with mortality treated with culture-matched antibiotics in intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational study Phenylephrine, ondansetron, or combination of both for prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section: A prospective, double-blind randomized control trial Artificial intelligence in anesthesia and critical care (part 1): Current perspective in critical care setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1