Audit of Eye Care for Ventilated Patients in Intensive Treatment Unit During COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI:10.4038/SLJA.V29I1.8755
Muditha Dhanapala, S. Sabaretnam
{"title":"Audit of Eye Care for Ventilated Patients in Intensive Treatment Unit During COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Muditha Dhanapala, S. Sabaretnam","doi":"10.4038/SLJA.V29I1.8755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The protective ocular mechanisms are disrupted due to sedation and neuromuscular relaxants. This increases the risk of developing ocular surface disease (OSD) leading to increased post critical care morbidity. The risks are further increased in patients who are nursed prone as access to eyes is limited. Our aim was to determine whether eye care met the standard of the Ophthalmic Services Guidance and to improve the quality of care provided if found to be deficient. Methodology and Results A prospective audit of the eye care provided to ventilated patients in critical care was done in April, 2020. An ophthalmological examination including fluoresce in staining was done to ascertain the prevalence of ocular morbidity present. Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and 88% patients were ventilated secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia. 35% of them were nursed prone at time of assessment; 81% had lagophthalmos (incomplete eye closure) while 53% of patients had a variant of OSD, including 23% with swollen conjunctival prolapse, 18% with conjunctivitis and 12% with corneal abrasions. None of the patients with lagophthalmos had received eye lubricants. Of the proned patients 50% had their eyes taped closed but only 33% had eye lubrication applied. We introduced local best practice guidance adapted from the Ophthalmic Services guidance. Education of critical care staff was undertaken and simplified guidance was exhibited in clinical areas. Post-intervention audit was carried out against the standard after a one-month interval and 24 patients were included (80% COVID-19 pneumonia); 67% had eye lubrication and 50% had eyes taped as per guidance in supine position. 100% of proned patients had eye lubricants with micropore taping. Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, staffs were recruited from diverse backgrounds including theatre scrub nurses, recovery practitioners and operation department practitioners, to work alongside critical care nurses caring for ventilated patients. Education on the best ophthalmic practice guidance enabled holistic care to be provided to many ventilated patients by staff with limited prior experience in eye care in critical care.","PeriodicalId":41531,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"29 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/SLJA.V29I1.8755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The protective ocular mechanisms are disrupted due to sedation and neuromuscular relaxants. This increases the risk of developing ocular surface disease (OSD) leading to increased post critical care morbidity. The risks are further increased in patients who are nursed prone as access to eyes is limited. Our aim was to determine whether eye care met the standard of the Ophthalmic Services Guidance and to improve the quality of care provided if found to be deficient. Methodology and Results A prospective audit of the eye care provided to ventilated patients in critical care was done in April, 2020. An ophthalmological examination including fluoresce in staining was done to ascertain the prevalence of ocular morbidity present. Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and 88% patients were ventilated secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia. 35% of them were nursed prone at time of assessment; 81% had lagophthalmos (incomplete eye closure) while 53% of patients had a variant of OSD, including 23% with swollen conjunctival prolapse, 18% with conjunctivitis and 12% with corneal abrasions. None of the patients with lagophthalmos had received eye lubricants. Of the proned patients 50% had their eyes taped closed but only 33% had eye lubrication applied. We introduced local best practice guidance adapted from the Ophthalmic Services guidance. Education of critical care staff was undertaken and simplified guidance was exhibited in clinical areas. Post-intervention audit was carried out against the standard after a one-month interval and 24 patients were included (80% COVID-19 pneumonia); 67% had eye lubrication and 50% had eyes taped as per guidance in supine position. 100% of proned patients had eye lubricants with micropore taping. Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, staffs were recruited from diverse backgrounds including theatre scrub nurses, recovery practitioners and operation department practitioners, to work alongside critical care nurses caring for ventilated patients. Education on the best ophthalmic practice guidance enabled holistic care to be provided to many ventilated patients by staff with limited prior experience in eye care in critical care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间重症监护室通气患者眼部护理的审计
镇静和神经肌肉松弛剂可破坏眼保护机制。这增加了发生眼表疾病(OSD)的风险,导致重症监护后发病率增加。由于接触眼睛的机会有限,易受护理的患者的风险进一步增加。我们的目的是确定眼科护理是否符合《眼科服务指南》的标准,并在发现有缺陷的情况下提高提供的护理质量。方法与结果于2020年4月对重症监护通气患者的眼部护理进行前瞻性审计。眼科检查包括荧光染色,以确定眼部疾病的患病率。27例患者符合纳入标准,88%的患者继发于COVID-19肺炎。35%的患者在评估时处于护理俯卧状态;81%的患者有lagophthalmos(不完全闭眼),53%的患者有OSD的变体,其中23%有肿胀的结膜脱垂,18%有结膜炎,12%有角膜擦伤。所有lagophthalmos患者均未使用眼润滑剂。在有斜视倾向的患者中,50%的人用胶带封住了眼睛,但只有33%的人使用了眼部润滑。我们引入了根据眼科服务指南改编的本地最佳实践指南。对重症监护人员进行教育,并在临床领域进行简化指导。间隔1个月按标准进行干预后审核,纳入24例患者(80%为COVID-19肺炎);67%的患者进行了眼部润滑,50%的患者按照指导进行了仰卧位眼胶布。100%的易感患者使用微孔贴合眼润滑剂。结论在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,我们招募了来自不同背景的工作人员,包括手术室清洁护士、康复医生和手术室医生,与重症监护护士一起护理通气患者。最好的眼科实践指导教育,使以前在危重病护理方面经验有限的工作人员能够为许多通气患者提供全面护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Single-Dose Dexmedetomidine on Cough Response During Tracheal Extubation C-MAC VL as Saviour Following Failed Intubation Attempts in an Infant with Huge Hydrocephalous Internal Carotid Artery Blood Flow Response to Anaesthesia, Pneumoperitoneum and Head-Up Tilt During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Clinical Study Anaphylaxis: Unveiling the silent killer Study on Ward-Based Practice of Vasopressor Administration for Patients with Sepsis, in National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1