An Exploration into the Acceptance of Male Rape Myths within the UK

E. Spruin, L. Reilly
{"title":"An Exploration into the Acceptance of Male Rape Myths within the UK","authors":"E. Spruin, L. Reilly","doi":"10.19080/jfsci.2018.09.555763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rape is worldwide issue with no demographic constraint, and previous studies have explored how rape myths serve to justify sexual violence against women at the hands of men. However, this study aims to bridge the gap in the literature that fails to account for rape myths that do not follow the traditional script. 65 UK university students completed measures of rape myth acceptance and ambivalent sexism to investigate the factors associated with supporting rape myths. \n \nA multiple regression indicated that the acceptance of female rape myths predicted the acceptance of male rape myths. However, the factors involved in facilitating this acceptance differed between the genders. \n \nThe findings are discussed in relation to the implications and conclude by offering directions for future research. Whilst the study is limited in some areas, such as the generalisation of findings, and the photonegative scales, it offers an interesting insight into understanding male rape myths and the factors that contribute to these attitudes within the UK.","PeriodicalId":93024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences & criminal investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences & criminal investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/jfsci.2018.09.555763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Rape is worldwide issue with no demographic constraint, and previous studies have explored how rape myths serve to justify sexual violence against women at the hands of men. However, this study aims to bridge the gap in the literature that fails to account for rape myths that do not follow the traditional script. 65 UK university students completed measures of rape myth acceptance and ambivalent sexism to investigate the factors associated with supporting rape myths. A multiple regression indicated that the acceptance of female rape myths predicted the acceptance of male rape myths. However, the factors involved in facilitating this acceptance differed between the genders. The findings are discussed in relation to the implications and conclude by offering directions for future research. Whilst the study is limited in some areas, such as the generalisation of findings, and the photonegative scales, it offers an interesting insight into understanding male rape myths and the factors that contribute to these attitudes within the UK.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国人对男性强奸神话的接受程度探讨
强奸是一个没有人口限制的世界性问题,以前的研究探讨了强奸神话如何为男性对女性的性暴力辩护。然而,这项研究旨在弥合文献中未能解释不遵循传统剧本的强奸神话的空白。65名英国大学生完成了接受强奸神话和矛盾的性别歧视的测量,以调查与支持强奸神话相关的因素。多元回归表明,对女性强奸神话的接受程度预测了对男性强奸神话的认可程度。然而,促进这种接受的因素因性别而异。讨论了这些发现的含义,并为未来的研究提供了方向。虽然这项研究在某些领域受到限制,例如研究结果的概括和照片负片量表,但它为理解英国男性强奸神话和导致这些态度的因素提供了一个有趣的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fatal Manual Strangulation: A Brief Overview Approaches for the Detection of Latent Fingermarks on Deceased Human Bodies Military Aspects of Malingering, Sexual and Reproductive Coercion: Report from Russia Sex Estimation in the Forensic Anthropology Classroom: Some Students Wonder, Where do I fit? Differentiation of Cut Damage caused by Sharp Objects on Cotton Clothes using SEM Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1